User talk:Joshkotw

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Jfire (talk) 19:37, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jfire (talk) 20:56, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

I don't see references for much if any of the other info so my additions don't seem out of place. The entire article has the warning at the top already. The information I am adding was told to me directly by a slashnet irc server admin and again by another irc op on the network. Dual sources but I'm not sure about what is the proper format for adding irc logs as reference? I removed the reference to anyone's specific name. Reverting back changes to confirm accuracy of this article.Joshkotw (talk) 14:48, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * We take WP:BLP very seriously here, and insinuating that a person or group of people condone racism or anti-semitism is a clear violation of that policy. "Told to me on IRC" is not a reliable source. 16:28, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jfire (talk) 16:25, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm not referencing any living persons by name and I'm not insinuating anything. I'm adding factual information that has been directly passed to me by the server operations. You accuse me of libel although I've said nothing false. Please review the definition before making any additional claims against me. My edits are not disruptive but factual and accurate. I am trying to help the community by adding appropriate info to make people aware of the situation and you start throwing around accusations and warnings. I have not violated anything so please refrain from further untrue accusations. The entire article is about irc so I don't see how references from irc are excluded. Some of the information would be unavailable any where else but from the irc network directly. Why not just remove the entire article since it contains other false information and lack of references? The article does not appear to have ever met the criteria for notability. Honestly, way too much trouble and time that I've already spent on this when I was trying to help others. As they say, no good deed goes unpunished. Joshkotw (talk) 16:52, 7 January 2009 (UTC)