User talk:Joshua761312006

for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Did you know that, although you can remove the four warnings from your talk page, they are still easily seen in the page history? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:11, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Further Contributions
Now that you know your behavior isn't allowed, what sort of contributions would you make (i.e. why should your block be lifted before its set expiration date)? TN X Man 23:13, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Exco Resources
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Exco Resources, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.excoresources.com/company_history.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:40, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated use of Wikipedia for promotion and repeated introduction of copyrighted text to Wikipedia. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 07:52, 13 November 2009 (UTC)


 * If you are unblocked, how exactly do you plan to contribute to Wikipedia? Accounting4Taste: talk 16:14, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I would also love to know where/how you gained your new knowledge. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 16:39, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I personally would like your comments on the fact that this block is for exactly the same reason, and for the same offences, as your previous one. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 20:20, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

I learned that it was not right and what I did was stupid and very wrong

I combined two requests for unblock into one; no need to have multiple active requests. On point, you still haven't responded to Anthony Bradbury's question, above, which read thus: "I personally would like your comments on the fact that this block is for exactly the same reason, and for the same offences, as your previous one." I can't comment on this request until you've addressed that point, which seems to describe the key problem fairly well. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 19:49, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

It was late at night I was not thinking and I did that mistake sorry ok — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshua761312006 (talk • contribs)