User talk:Joshua Issac/Archive 2

Travian
Hi, as an active editor I wondered if I could ask to drop by the Travian article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Travian and give feed back on a developing edit war between myself and another editor. Thanks Jasonfward (talk) 23:22, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

RE: WikiProject Dravidian civilizations banner advertisement
Sorry I was not able to answer your query sooner, I was spending time with the family during Christmas break :). Sorry I cannot correct the banner without creating it from scratch all over again.  I have unfortunately lost the original source file.  If I get time in the future I will correct the spelling error and upload a new version.  Thanks for letting me know about the typo!¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk)  18:38, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Tongue vs toungue
While I appreciate your spelling corrections I should point out that, while I am American, and would normally use the American version, my right index finger is British (due to an unfortuate incident with a double-decker bus in 1987). Thanks for the change.--Buster7 (talk) 23:43, 8 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I did not know that toungue was the correct spelling in American English. Thanks for pointing it out. --Joshua Issac (talk) 12:15, 9 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I would like to understand this text.... It's a joke, Joshua. Just a bit of fun! Some levity amidst the high drama. Since it stems from the humorous (please note spelling) Cabal page I thought you would "get" it. I guess we ARE seperated by a common language!--Buster7 (talk) 12:36, 9 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Oh! I get it now. Everyone uses humorous now, by the way; humourous obsolete. --Joshua Issac (talk) 12:48, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey Joshua
Thanks for your message. Yep, I know about the spoofing checkbox - but this user Psb came up as too similar - and the account was recently active (Sept 08). So by rights we should have closed it as too similar. Still, no major harm done I suppose. Cheers, Paxse (talk) 17:12, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Damn. Egg on my face. I missed this edit by Prodego 10 days ago. Damn him for changing the rules on me. :) Paxse (talk) 17:16, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Citing Wikipedia articles
Hi Joshua, on your edit at Citing sources: A Wikipedia article has a time stamp that, if given, enables anybody to retrieve the exact version. In addition to that, what use is it to know the day when somebody who cites this version happened to look at it, i.e., the access date? That's why this exact guideline says the retrieval date should be "invisible to the reader if the article has a date of publication." Cheers, --EnOreg (talk) 00:37, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Shall I revert? --Joshua Issac (talk) 01:40, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * That would be great, thanks! --EnOreg (talk) 06:32, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


 * ✅ --Joshua Issac (talk) 15:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

You live over 1,000 miles away!
Listen you limey, I am pretty sure that you have never been on Robert. A. Millikan High School Campus, so do not put things that you are not sure about. I have been ATTENDING Millikan for 4 years, I see the motto every day. Just because the website is never updated and the webmaster is a dumbass, does not mean that you can change things that you do not even know about. I will try to get someone to upload a picture with the mootto.

Good Day! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.108.250.155 (talk) 19:22, 31 January 2009 (UTC)


 * All right then, I've changed the motto back to your version. I'm not British, by the way. I guess it is my fault, though; I'll put up the userbox now. --Joshua Issac (talk) 20:55, 31 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I should not have assumed that you were British. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.108.250.155 (talk) 01:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)


 * No problem. --Joshua Issac (talk) 14:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Kings of Chaos
Well, you did fine. I simply restored the redirect that was out there originally. Is there anything else that needs to be done that I'm missing? Thanks.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:18, February 2, 2009 (UTC)


 * Kings of Chaos was being converted back into a disambiguation page (for Kings of Chaos (game)). --Joshua Issac (talk) 19:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Gotcha. Would you like me to move Kings of Chaos to Kings of Chaos (album) then?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:40, February 2, 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes, please. --Joshua Issac (talk) 19:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. Have fun fixing all those backlinks :)  Let me know if you need anything else, though.  Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:50, February 2, 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks. --Joshua Issac (talk) 20:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)


 * There was only one back-link in the mainspace. --Joshua Issac (talk) 21:21, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Hey Jousna
Me also from Kerala,plays KOC and ended 46 last age ie age 10.Im from Kannur nad now working in Banglore.My mail id is thejus56@gmail.com, and do u play KOC(Kings Of Chaos)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taures-RF (talk • contribs) 03:31, 5 February 2009


 * I have never played Kings of Chaos. I just like editing MMOG articles (because I play Travian). You may want to replace the @ in your e-mail address in your message with an image with the template NonSpamEmail to prevent spam. For example, " produces . --Joshua Issac (talk) 08:00, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * OK boss,did not know that... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Taures-RF (talk • contribs) 03:58, 6 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Sorry if I sounded bossy. I didn't mean to. --Joshua Issac (talk) 08:59, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Space in Girl article
It's not that big of a deal since it's only a space and all but why do you want a space in that article right there? What is the purpose of it? The article would look neater without it so yeah. Like I said it's not that big of a deal but yeah I'm curious what the purpose of that space is. Oh and Mallu pride, brotha! ;) Zachorious (talk) 10:06, 9 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I don't know why the space was put there. You may want to ask . --Joshua Issac (talk) 16:26, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Category:FL-Class Dravidian languages articles
Every category you create you should specify one or more parent categories in which it appears. In the case of a project category like this, the parent categories are provided automatically when you include the Cat class template. Let me know if you have any questions about this.--Stepheng3 (talk) 17:51, 11 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I'll keep that in mind. --Joshua Issac (talk) 19:29, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Nile Online
If you look at the original post though, you will see at no point is there a call to "vote," it was geared more towards telling people to go and improve the article, so that it wouldn't have to be deleted. Hpelgrift (talk) 15:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Sorry, my bad!. --Joshua Issac (talk) 15:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Don't worry about it, lol, keep up the good work though! Hpelgrift (talk) 21:30, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Article History
Understood. I thought the date was for when the discussion was opened. Sorry, 03:57, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem. --Joshua Issac (talk) 12:10, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please do not change the Acid3 scores in the Google Chrome article, as they are from the source
hello

i test it my self also you can do so.

regarding to my testing result i see that Google Chrome 1.0.154.48 gave me 79 on the acid 3 test and also Google Chrome 2.0.162.0 which is in beta release gave me back 99 on acid 3 and just fail on test 80 fail: kungFuDeathGrip was null. please update your sources and then change the must updated articles.

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.147.198.38 (talk) 08:17, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Pardus_(browser_game)
Hiya. I put some thoughts re the article name on Talk:Pardus_(video_game) and would like your comments. I think Video_game is less accurate than Computer_game was and we should ask WP:CVG to approve Browser_game. -- LantzR (talk) 22:31, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

The WikiProject Novels Newsletter - March 2009
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:02, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Tata Nano
As pointed out by another user, the Singur article has multiple issues and hence I edited it. I saw that you have reverted it back. I have given the reasons in the talk page. Please discuss. trakesht (talk) 17:14, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the message. --Joshua Issac (talk) 18:42, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Heads up
Hi Joshua Issac, per earlier consensus at WP:PERM it has been concluded that users who have the account creator flag but have not done any recent account creations are to have the flag removed. As such, I removed you ACC flag. If you choose to become active again, feel free to re-request it. Cheers, Tiptoety  talk 03:31, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I do not have access to the tool any more, so I won't be needing it.--Joshua Issac (talk) 18:28, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

RE: Account Creation Interface access
Hi there,

I forgot about this! Yes - you were suspended for re-opening requests that had been correctly closed over 3 months ago (at that time). Therefore, I suspended you and asked you to contact me in the suspended message. I am prepared to unsuspend you - and allow you back to use the tool, but I am wondering why you re-opened those accounts in the first place? (Note: If you contacted me at the time, then your "ban" might have not been as long!).

Thanks,

The Helpful  One  11:37, 7 April 2009 (UTC)


 * OK, I will unban you if you promise to leave the closed requests closed - most people know what they are doing at ACC, so the closed requests have been closed for a good reason - I hope! The  Helpful  One  17:54, 8 April 2009 (UTC)


 * On that note, welcome back to the ACC team! :) The  Helpful  One  10:49, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to the ACC Team!
Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request. You may now access the tool here. Before you do so, please read the tool's guide to familiarize yourself with the process. You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts on Freenode and/or you may also wish to the subscribe to the mailing list, which is used for internal discussions between the account creation team. Keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse may result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me on my talk page if you have any questions. Thank you for your participating in the account creation process. The Helpful  One  12:49, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Just my little welcome message! :) The  Helpful  One  12:49, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Category:Waterloo Road templates
For every category you create, you should specify parent categories to which it belongs. In the case of a category like this one, parent categories are provided automatically when you include a Template category template. I've added the template.

I am a human being, not a bot, so you can contact me if you have questions about this. Best regards, --Stepheng3 (talk) 04:40, 22 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I'll keep that in mind.--Joshua Issac (talk) 18:03, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Blocked user
Hi. If you check this person's edit history, he was adding unsourced, POV material and started not only to questioning (and replacing) the deletions, but started in to abusive behavior as well. That's why I had to shut down the talk page. In short, another garden variety adolescent vandal. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 21:25, 23 May 2009 (UTC)


 * PS: I was only going to block him for a day, that is, until he started in with the "f**k you" attacks.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 21:26, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Proposed Arabic numerals to Hindu-Arabic numerals move
Hi, I noticed that you also think that the article needs to be moved back to its original title. It seems that there are some people that refuse to accept the evidence. I suspect there is a political or personal agenda behind this opposition. The "discussion" was closed without coming to a consensus. This is a very good example of why I detest this process on Wikipedia. Someone moved this article without gaining consensus to that effect, now we can't rectify the error without a consensus. It's ludicrous. I definitely want to see this error corrected. What is our next step? Mediation? Do you have any experience with this? Could you help? Rapparee71 (talk) 11:43, 28 May 2009 (UTC)


 * You could ask someone at Wikipedia talk:Requested moves or Village pump, notifying them about the admin's move which violated Consensus. I do not have any experience with this. Sorry about the late reply; I was busy in real life. --Joshua Issac (talk) 19:04, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:MacarthurCrest.png)
Thanks for uploading File:MacarthurCrest.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:35, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Babri Mosque Please Help
Thank you for commens on the discussion page of this article. I wrote the architectural section of the article which I found vandalised. My article had been there for four years withouth change and had stood the test of time. But then somebody keeps removing paragraphs recently. Please keep an eye on this work. I have restored it to the point 22:43, 26 November 2009 79.77.139.65 which are the last of my three edits. I have also put back a photograph of the Mosque. I do not get involved in the politics of the dispute, I only write on architecture of old monuments both Jewish Hindu and Muslim in India and elsewhere. But as a architect i say again I only intrested in architecture of monuments and not the politics of the dispute. I would be very grateful if you can keep an eye on my article (architectural sections) and revert to 22:43, 26 November 2009 79.77.139.65 which is the original for comparison. I originally wrote the article (architectural section, cooling system, well) in 2006 and it keeps getting vandalised only recently as the Mosque has been in the Indian news. Of Course I welcome and would be very happy if the section was improved by a fellow wikipedian with an interest in architecture of religious monuments. kind regards jaffa levy  79.77.253.58 (talk) 00:35, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Novels - Coordinator Election
Hello. To begin, every member of WikiProject Novels will be getting this message (the joy of macros) so if you wish to get in touch with me, please post a message on my talk page. I would encourage anyone who so wishes, to stand in the Coordinator Elections. If you wish to stand, please do so by 23:59pm, June 27. Voting will the continue to 23:59pm, July 21. Can everyone please check-out the Coordinator Elections page. Also, the collaboration of the month is The Tin Drum, so if you have any spare time, please check it out. And I apologise to the seven of you for whom this will be a repeat message. Regards, Alan16 (talk).

Your !vote at Wikipedia talk:Full-date unlinking bot
Hi, could you give a reason as to why you're opposing the proposal? As it is a request for comment, some clarification would be nice. Regards, Dabomb87 (talk) 22:53, 24 June 2009 (UTC)


 * OK, I thought it was all right to vote without providing a reason when I saw lots of "Support" votes without any reasons stated. I will provide a reason now. --Joshua Issac (talk) 22:58, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, I will contact the supporters. Thank you. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:07, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Coordinator Election
Hello. The Coordiantor Election has begun. All members are encouraged to vote by the deadline, July 28. To vote simply add support to the comments and questions for.. section of the member of your choice.

3 users are standing:

Regards, Alan16 (talk) 19:45, 29 June 2009 (UTC).

Ragging
If you disliked my warning for this you might have placed a more appropriate warning at the user page instead of just removing my warning. Cheers --Law Lord (talk) 23:10, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Northamptonshire
Hi ! A Top Priority article you have been involved with has many  issues and urgently needs improving. If you can help with these issues please see Talk:Northamptonshire, address the different points if you  can, and leave any  comments there. (This is a generic message. if it  has been placed on your talk  page inadvertantly, please ignore it.) --Kudpung --Kudpung (talk) 23:00, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Northamptonshire
Hi ! A Top Priority article you have been involved with has many  issues and urgently needs improving. If you can help with these issues please see Talk:Northamptonshire, address the different points if you  can, and leave any  comments there. (This is a generic message. if it  has been placed on your talk  page inadvertantly, please ignore it.) --Kudpung --Kudpung (talk) 23:04, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Novels - Narnia Task Force
Hi! You would be glad to know that a new wikipedia ad has been created by Srinivas to encourage users to join Chronicles of Narnia Task Force. You can display that ad on your user/talk page too using the following code:

-- Alan16 (talk) 10:35, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Television program
Television program has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.  Czech Out  ☎ |  ✍  17:16, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

DeskSpace
Hi Joshua,

I've updated the DeskSpace page to correct a few minor mistakes (like DeskSpace requiring DirectX 9) and add more information about the features and history of DeskSpace.

However, I understand there is a conflict of interest in me editing a page about software my company owns, so I would really appreciate it if you could take a look at the changes and remove/revert anything you find objectionable.

Kind Regards,

James Stewart -- Managing Director Otaku Software Pty Ltd —Preceding unsigned comment added by Otakusoftware (talk • contribs) 08:25, 6 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the contributions and the notice, James. --Joshua Issac (talk) 23:27, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Babri Mosque Please Help
Thank you for commens on the discussion page of this article. I wrote the architectural section of the article which I found vandalised. My article had been there for four years withouth change and had stood the test of time. But then somebody keeps removing paragraphs recently. Please keep an eye on this work. I have restored it to the point 22:43, 26 November 2009 79.77.139.65 which are the last of my three edits. I have also put back a photograph of the Mosque. I do not get involved in the politics of the dispute, I only write on architecture of old monuments both Jewish Hindu and Muslim in India and elsewhere. But as a architect i say again I only intrested in architecture of monuments and not the politics of the dispute. I would be very grateful if you can keep an eye on my article (architectural sections) and revert to 22:43, 26 November 2009 79.77.139.65 which is the original for comparison. I originally wrote the article (architectural section, cooling system, well) in 2006 and it keeps getting vandalised only recently as the Mosque has been in the Indian news. Of Course I welcome and would be very happy if the section was improved by a fellow wikipedian with an interest in architecture of religious monuments. 79.77.253.58 (talk) 00:35, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

A Suggestion/Question About The Archenemies Page... Abw2 (talk) 03:56, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello Joshua,

You don't know, I'm actually very new to this site as a member, but I have a suggestion if I may. I don't know if you're in charge of the Archenemies page, but if you are then I would like to suggest adding on the villain Seska (from Star Trek: Voyager) as one of Captain Kathryn Janeway archenemies, perhaps as Seska and The Borg Queen are the archenemies of Captain Kathryn Janeway on Star Trek: Voyager. I think that that would more accurate then simply listing The Borg Queen as Captain Janeway's archenemy. What do you think?

Amil


 * Hello Amil! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your comment. You are right in that Seska should be listed as Captain Kathryn Janeway's arch-enemy. Upon searching the web for sources supporting this, I found the transcript of a 1996 interview with Kate Mulgrew, in which she refers to Seska as her arch-enemy. --Joshua Issac (talk) 20:18, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Medieval Warm Period
Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed is on article probation. -- TS 21:22, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Miss Hannah Minx
I notice you replaced the content here (which is fine), but I just want to discuss which parts of the article you feel to be necessary. Fourth ventricle (talk) 17:42, 20 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your comment. I think the parts which are referenced to third-party sources (sources 5 – 8) in the Media reception section should stay. The fan art section could be condensed into a caption for a single artwork image. The Music and journalism career can go unless any third-part sources can be found for it. --Joshua Issac (talk) 18:25, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Just chat along
Hi, This is Loving Bee.. Would u like to tell me more about urself? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.126.29.150 (talk) 09:27, 24 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi Loving Bee, welcome to Wikipedia! About me...I'm a British Indian student in the UK and I like books, Windows and Doctor Who. How about you? --Joshua Issac (talk) 17:26, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Internet celebrity
See here, for some thoughts about supporting additional fields in infobox person. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 22:45, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 03:27, 16 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks! :) --Joshua Issac (talk) 11:24, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Note on banned user
The IP user 199.126.224.245 was actually a sockpuppet of banned user User:100110100. The user has a very distinctive pattern of edits, involving changing headings and hatnotes. If you notice additional changes like that, feel free to undo them. If you let an admin know about it, we can block the IP addresses temporarily as well. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 11:20, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Closure of ACC request 52926
I was wondering what the rationale behind the closure of this request was. I don't see it myself. Regards Alexandr Dmitri (talk) 18:52, 21 September 2010 (UTC)


 * The requested username is the name of the user's blog, so I felt it was promotional. --Joshua Issac (talk) 12:12, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Wewaii for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Wewaii, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Wewaii until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wyatt Riot (talk) 14:37, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Travians for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Travians, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Travians until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wyatt Riot (talk) 03:35, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Request an account/Administrators
Request an account/Administrators, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Request an account/Administrators and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Request an account/Administrators during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- DQ  (t)  (e)  00:11, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wewaii logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Wewaii logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  04:01, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WewaiiScreenshot.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:WewaiiScreenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  04:01, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Bilderberg Group
Hello Loremaster, I was wondering what the rationale behind your reversion of my edit at Bilderberg Group was. I had removed a fact tag, because a source which verified the claim, Juventud Rebelde, is already referenced in the same paragraph; so the reference whoever placed the tag is probably seeking is already in the paragraph (as I stated in my edit summary). --Joshua Issac (talk) 00:49, 17 November 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm glad you brought this up with me rather than simply restoring your edit. The Estulin-Castro paragraph was inspired by an interesting statement issued by the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL) entitled Daniel Estulin and the phony 'Bilderberg conspiracy'. They claim that conspiracy theories about the Bilderberg group have been reported in international news and therefore have gained an international audience after being first reported in Cuban news in light of Estulin's visit to Cuba. Unfortunately, other Wikipedia editors have argued that the statement is a not reliable source for that claim but can be used to report the PSL's concern about the effect the dissemination of these conspiracy theories might have. Therefore, we need reliable sources in the form of international news articles that discuss Estulin's visit to Cuba to support that first sentence of the paragraph. --Loremaster (talk) 05:17, 17 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. --Joshua Issac (talk) 20:09, 17 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Good. If you could help me track these sources down, it would be very much appreciated. --Loremaster (talk) 19:54, 19 November 2010 (UTC)


 * I found this (a) article which attributes the content to the Associated Press (a). Not sure if it's enough. --Joshua Issac (talk) 22:29, 29 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately, it is the same article that we already using to source some sentences in the paragraph dealing with Castro and Estulin. It doesn't discuss Estulin's visit to Cuba... :/ --Loremaster (talk) 22:46, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Getting out of topic on Wikipedia a little bit.
I just feel like saying. I like your first name. Basically becase it's my first name as well. ;) − Jhenderson  7 7 7  21:25, 29 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks...I like your name, too ;) --Joshua Issac (talk) 22:09, 29 December 2010 (UTC)