User talk:Joshua Zarate

Re: Animation studio
Please stop delinking animation studio on articles about Japanese anime studios, as you have done on Kyoto Animation, Diomedéa and Yumeta Company. This is a perfectly valid link, so I cannot understand for the life of me why you would want to delink them, especially considering that you are doing so without any edit summary.-- 十八 04:25, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
Hello, I'm Narutolovehinata5. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ange Vierge without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:21, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Re: Feel (company)
As a friendly heads up, please do not change Feel to feel. per WP:MOS-TM. As for the period, this is routinely left out based on normal punctuation rules, as can be seen in such articles are Gangsta (manga) and Bakuman.-- 十八 08:26, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Infoboxes
I see you removing producers (why?) and also, his name is not Akira Watanabe, it's Hiroshi Watanabe (渡辺陽 / わたなべ ひろし). I mean, for the record, producers can't be source cited, no producers essentially can; they're all credit cited, which means looking at Opening or Ending credits, which is allowed if proof can be shown, so just randomly removing them isn't necessarily cool. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 07:20, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)