User talk:Joshuawillison

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Deckiller 15:11, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Colin A. Franklin
Thanks for starting this article - it needs quite a bit of work to bring it into the proper format - please read the above guidelines and have a tidy! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 15:53, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:ColinFranklin.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ColinFranklin.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 15:55, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Colinfranklin2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Colinfranklin2.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 17:05, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:JohnWillison.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:JohnWillison.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 18:06, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Horomonapohio.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Horomonapohio.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 23:05, 10 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Actually, the picture is clearly in the public domain (whatever the museum claims) since the gentleman died in 1880, and any photograph taken more than 120 years ago is public domain even if we don't know who the photographer was. But it would be good if you could provide a link to the source of the image. User:Angr 14:51, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

July 2009
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Based on your user name you may have a conflict of interest on this article which is entirely unreferenced and may be considered for deletion. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:41, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Willison (musician)


The article John Willison (musician) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * With only one reliable citation (showing him as a member of staff), he is not notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me, My Contribs ) 07:12, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Carmel Kaine


The article Carmel Kaine has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No reliable references can be found; merely credits on various recordings.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:45, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of John Willison (musician)
I have nominated John Willison (musician), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/John Willison (musician). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me, My Contribs ) 18:03, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Further to the above standard message, may I make the following comments:


 * 1) If you wish to oppose the deletion, may I suggest that you leave a comment on the Articles for deletion/John Willison (musician) page.
 * 2) Merely stating that he is notable is insufficient - you need to provide reliable sources of information that can be used for citations. The important word here is reliable - I strongly suggest that you read the guidelines that are linked to here.
 * 3) When I placed the PROD, I had listed the only reliable source of information that I could find with a quick search of Google - the staff listing of the institution where he currently works. All the other hits on Google were either on other wikipedias or websites that use a feed from wikipedia (generally called wikis). These in themselves are not counted as adequate evidence of notability, as they are only using the article, not giving new, verifiable information.
 * 4) Good advice on the notability of musicians can be found at Wikipedia's Guidelines on Notability of Musicians.
 * 5) From the Wikipedia Guidelines on Reliability of Sources: In general, the most reliable sources are peer-reviewed journals and books published in university presses; university-level textbooks; magazines, journals, and books published by respected publishing houses; and mainstream newspapers. Electronic media may also be used. As a rule of thumb, the greater the degree of scrutiny involved in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the evidence and arguments of a particular work, the more reliable the source is.
 * If you can find such sources of information, then please:


 * 1) Note them in the article, with citations
 * 2) Make a note of them on the Articles for Deletion talk page mentioned above.

Please do not take this process as a personal affont - we value all contributions, but as I am sure you will appreciate, these need to follow the guidelines of Wikipedia!

I hope you can improve the article as mentioned above - I could not find the sources of reliable information, which is why I nominated it for deletion.

If you have any questions, please contact me by clicking on the "Contact Me" link in my signature: --  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me, My Contribs ) 18:03, 2 August 2009 (UTC)