User talk:Jossycruise

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Money supply, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Money supply was changed by Jossycruise (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.87244 on 2011-03-24T00:13:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:13, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Monetary policy with your recent edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. NellieBly (talk) 00:19, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Monetary policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. NellieBly (talk) 00:29, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Monetary policy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jasper Deng (talk) 00:31, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jasper Deng (talk) 00:40, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 00:52, 24 March 2011 (UTC)