User talk:Joud98

November 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Biochemistry with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Wknight94 talk 20:32, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Riad Jarjour. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Riad Jarjour was changed by Joud98 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2011-11-06T18:11:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:11, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
Thanks for visiting! If you have questions, visit Tutorial or contact me at my talk page.

SwisterTwister  talk  17:48, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

June 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Durban, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Durban was changed by Joud98 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874667 on 2012-06-30T17:59:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:59, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Durban. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Valenciano (talk) 18:00, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hungary, you may be blocked from editing. Chip123456 (talk) 18:05, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hungary, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Chip123456 (talk) 18:07, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (talk) 18:43, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
Hello! Thanks for your feedback! If you have any questions about Wikipedia, please don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Have a great day! (:

Webclient101 (talk) 19:02, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

&#160;