User talk:Journey1017

September 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Jett Prescott has been reverted. Your edit here to Jett Prescott was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://twitter.com/jettprescott) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:04, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

August 2022
doesn't show that the topic meets Wikipedia's standards for notability. According to Wikipedia's general notability guideline, a topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received in  that are.

A source meets all three requirements when it: (use the links in this notice for full definitions and detailed advice):
 * Significant coverage: Addresses the subject directly and in detail. A source with only trivial, off-topic mentions of the subject is not sufficient.
 * Reliable: Has a reliable publication process, or a published author who is well-established as authoritative in the subject.
 * Independent: Is not produced by the article's subject or someone affiliated with it. For example, these are not independent: press releases, autobiographies, the subject’s website, and interviews with the subject or someone connected to the subject of the article.

There are several pages that can help, including Wikipedia's notability standards and the subject-specific notability guidelines. Specific questions can be answered live at the Teahouse help forum. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:42, 6 August 2022 (UTC)