User talk:Journojack

Hi, the article needs independent verifiable sources that it meets the notability guidelines. That is, you need to list in a reference section reliable sources that show the label is significant (not the company's own site, myspace or similar). It could also do with phrasing in a more encyclopaedic, neutral style, but the main thing is to show that it is a company that matters to other people  Jimfbleak . talk .115:43, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

College Music Update
A tag has been placed on College Music Update, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on Talk:College Music Update.

Additional note: What Jimfbleak mentioned above is the main reason I flagged this article. Also searching on "College Music Update" through Google came up with very few independent references beyond blog mentions and text identical to the text in this article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pigman |undefined 22:03, 3 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi! I actually think it would be better to create an article with the spelled out title (College Music Update) and create a redirect for the more common name (CMU Daily) pointing to the main article. Unfortunately, I remain slightly skeptical about notability because the first few pages of hits I got were mostly podcast listings and self-promotional stuff. I really recommend reading the notability guidelines for websites as well as the attribution page. If you can get together a couple of independent verifiable sources, the page is much more likely to withstand any challenges to it. Below is a welcome message with a number of good links to help you learn more about the process on Wikipedia. Again, I'm happy to answer any questions you might have or direct you to someone who knows. Cheers, Pigman |undefined 22:15, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

ThreeWeeks
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article ThreeWeeks, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 05:29, 25 January 2008 (UTC)