User talk:Jovanteythomas

Hello! This is where you can talk to me. Please be nice and gentle. I will try to contact back ASAP.

Speedy deletion nomination of Focus on your own family!


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Focus on your own family!, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Agtx (talk) 02:27, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

October 2015


A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. -- Tavix ( talk ) 16:03, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015


A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. -- Tavix ( talk ) 16:04, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015


A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. -- Tavix ( talk ) 16:04, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015


A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. -- Tavix ( talk ) 16:06, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015


A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. -- Tavix ( talk ) 16:06, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015


A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. -- Tavix ( talk ) 16:13, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. HighInBC 17:14, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Amabo Kcarab


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Amabo Kcarab, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
 * It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Tavix ( talk ) 19:17, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Jeb! listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jeb!. Since you had some involvement with the Jeb! redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. p b  p  04:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Ridley is too big listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ridley is too big. Since you had some involvement with the Ridley is too big redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:22, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

July 2016 - "Michael Obama Redirect"


A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. ChesterAbbotsbury (talk) 03:10, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

0bama listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 0bama. Since you had some involvement with the 0bama redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 01:54, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Unblock request
I'm inclined to give you another chance after this much time, but I would like to know what sorts of contributions you want to make(such as what articles or topic areas). 331dot (talk) 20:45, 3 December 2019 (UTC)


 * I as well. Please give examples of constructive edits you would make. I believe a topic ban on post 1932 American politics might be in order.--  Deep fried  okra    21:28, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * To be specific, I want to add to the list of hypothetical planets page. I noticed it is lacking Pan Horus, a hypothetical planet first conceptualized by Linda Goodman and is now an obscure topic in esoteric astrology. Also, I would like to go more in-depth in the articles about Alfred Witte and Uranian astrology (which lacks information not just on Wikipedia but the entire Internet). I would also like to maintain some fandom articles I am part of, such as Pokemon, Sonic, etc. Jovanteythomas (talk) 03:07, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * After four years I think you should be unblocked pending clarification of what you mean by "when I was young" (as well as aformentioned examples of edits you want to make). If you were 38 when you were blocked and you're 42 now, I would agree with Deepfriedokra that you should be unblocked with a possible topic ban on post 1932 American politics. If you were 14 when you were blocked and 18 now, I'd be inclined to see this account fully rehabilitated and to have you unblocked with no editing restrictions. I've dealt with a few previous cases where someone edited while a legal child and have requested account rehabilitation as an adult (or near to one) and there's been a general sense they are a cognitively and developmentally different person and anything less than immediate and unrestricted unblocking would be inappropriately punitive. Chetsford (talk) 22:40, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't think we need to know your actual age. Just need a sense that unblocking will result in constructive editing.--  Deep fried  okra    22:49, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry, yes, to clarify I'm explicitly not asking for your age, proof of identity, etc. and would ask you not post that. Thank you to Deepfriedokra for catching my poor wording. I'm only interested in a general sense of what is meant by "when I was young". To avoid confusion as to meaning, I've struck my previous comment. Chetsford (talk) 23:42, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, I was a young teen being edgy, and now I am a reasonably mature adult, if that's what you're talking about. Jovanteythomas (talk) 03:07, 5 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Support per nom and the timeframe. This is why I'm not a fan of indefinite blocks; they get forgotten about. It'd be better to put a 1-2 year (or less) time limit on it. --Doug Mehus T · C  23:12, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm inclined to unblock without conditions. Any objections? Kevin ( aka L235 · t · c) 00:09, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
 * No objections at all here! Fully support. Chetsford (talk) 20:48, 26 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Unblock This has dragged on for so long. Just can't keep track of it al. Gotta work tomorrow, so I won't circle back soon. --  Deep fried  okra    00:12, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

"0bama" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 0bama. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TheAwesome Hwyh  15:32, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

"0bama" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=0bama&redirect=no 0bama] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. TNstingray (talk) 15:09, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

"0bama" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=0bama&redirect=no 0bama] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. SouthParkFan2006 (talk) 10:55, 8 December 2023 (UTC)