User talk:Jovette hogette

May 2011
Hello Jovette hogette. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Hogettes, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 23:11, 23 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi, I am reverting your edits because they are breaking the structure of the Wiki table format. Please preview your changes before saving them to see their effect on the article. Also, the source already cited for this member states that he is a founding member, and you should not use first-person language such as "Our first volunteer" in Wikipedia's voice. All articles are written from the third-person. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 23:32, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Hogettes. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 20:24, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Edit summaries aren't required and spamming his page with notices is unhelpful.
 * Joe, I see you're taking some issue with Ralph Campbell's entry. Would you mind explaining the issue here? Was he simply an original member rather than a co-founder? Lara  21:29, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Edit summaries do make a big difference when it comes to people like me determining the worth of an edit. If there is a reason given for the deletion of information, then it is much more likely to stand than just some random vandalism. And if this user doesn't want me 'spamming' him with templates, then he should take some time to read Wikipedia policies and obey them. Elizium23 (talk) 21:38, 25 May 2011 (UTC)