User talk:Jovhar Muse.

Hello, Jovhar Muse., and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place  on this page and someone will drop by to help. We're so glad you're here! FeydHuxtable (talk) 10:32, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Your first article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
 * Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

Thanks for your good edits to our platform economy page.

Considering you're new here, these were fantastic edits! However, as is almost unavoidable when a new editor trys to make major changes, the edits were not fully compliant with our editing policy. For example:

1) It's not a good thing to shorten the lede ("introduction" as you called it) to only 2 paragraphs.  Guidelines suggest at least 3 paragraphs for a large article.

2) An assessment type section ("debate" as you called it) normally comes towards the end of an article. We already have such a section in platform economy.  (I moved some of your new additions over there.)

3) Generally, it's not a good idea to include a statement like "could be mediated by digital platforms in six years time" unless you date the source it comes from. Otherwise, readers might assume the statement means 6 years from now, which is already wrong, and will be increasingly wrong as time passes.

4) There's lot's of ways to correctly cite references, but yours isn't one of them.  E.g.,  we don't like to cram both an author's last & first name into the "Last" field. Note this correction.  PS - great choice of source,   good professor Graham is one of the very few with a truly penetrating understanding of the platform economy.

5) I mostly left your paragraph about AI, as those critical points have been made by many mainstream sources these last 5 years or so. But long term, you really need a reference for a paragraph like that.

As a general point, before making big changes to articles on major global subjects, it's maybe better to learn a bit more about editing by making changes on more low profile articles. Just a suggestion though - it is possible to very quickly get your changes fully accepted even on the big articles - as long as you're willing to put in the hard work to learn our policies.

On the platform economy, I'm conscious it needs some major updating. However, much of what's been written in the last year or two by the big consultancies and academics, about an increasingly borderless world etc, is now unrealistic thanks to Covid. So I'm planning to wait a while, to see how sources react to developments.

All this said, your welcome to continue editing the platform economy article if you like. Just be aware that edits that aren't policy compliant may be reverted.

Thanks again for your good edits. Again, I hope you decide to stay and edit more! FeydHuxtable (talk) 10:32, 28 April 2020 (UTC)