User talk:Jovitosalonga1987

July 2022
Wikipedia follows a consensus model and takes in terminology from reliable sources. You have been making mass edits reversing terminology used by reliable sources. Please explain your reasoning or proof of prior consensus before continuing, or else your edits will be reverted. Chlod (say hi!) 02:56, 6 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Your username is also problematic: Wikipedia does not allow the impersonation of notable figures. Please ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest. Chlod (say hi!) 02:59, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * @Chlod Well, I was literally born as Jovito Salonga. That's my real name. But, I am not related to the HISTORICAL FIGURE that we all know today. I was born in 1987, the same year as that figure was re-elected to the Senate. Jovitosalonga1987 (talk) 03:04, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * @Chlod Their reliable sources are inappropriate. Jovitosalonga1987 (talk) 03:02, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * That is not a valid explanation. The term "dictatorship" is used by the Deutsche Welle, NPR, Agence France-Presse, Time, Rappler, and the Official Gazette of the Philippines. If you wish to make mass-changes to pages, discuss this first with other editors. Chlod (say hi!) 03:09, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * @Chlod The word "dictatorship" is used by those westernized media. Rappler, on the other hand, used the word "dictatorship" because they have their bias opinions against Marcos. They are also one of the most distrusted need media agency in the Philippines. Jovitosalonga1987 (talk) 03:14, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Editors on Wikipedia have already discussed the reliability of the aforementioned sources, with much of editors agreeing that all are generally reliable (DW, NPR, AFP, Time, Rappler). This is an application of consensus, and cannot be overridden by opinion. There is no reason why these sources are inappropriate for use on Wikipedia, and since we rely on reliable sources, the removal of the terminology is uncalled for. Yes, Wikipedia does rely on some Western media, but said media has built up a reputation for being trusted sources. I see no reason why the terminology should be removed without explanation on your edit summaries, unilaterally, on multiple articles, and without discussion with other editors. Chlod (say hi!) 03:24, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Leni Robredo, you may be blocked from editing. Felida97 (talk) 01:17, 22 October 2022 (UTC)