User talk:Jowan Marghak

March 2024
Hello, I'm Shadow311. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bubble gum, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Shadow311 (talk) 23:02, 9 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello, I am Jowan, and I cited the program which has the visible proof of a man in a boat, wearing a Bowler Hat, who is easily seen blowing bubbles with what can only be bubble gum. And the date of the film is easily verified because it was an historic event, which saw the largest single drowning event in the Thames, these unfortunate people were drowned because the wash from the launching of HMS Albion(12/6/1898) washed away the scaffolding that they were on to see the launch, I also gave the time within the program that you can see it, as well as the makers of the program and the channel which it was made for, and if you are unable to see British tv, then you can see it through PBS too.
 * But if you are in doubt after checking that out, then you should be considering why the supposed inventor didn't patent it, or defend it, and I am telling you that he couldn't patent it, because it had been made in the UK for thirty years, on top of that, I am wondering what proof you have asked for, that proves that it was invented in 1928, that would be able to nullify the verified film proof, that was, and only could've been taken at the time of the disaster that saw over thirty people drown in the Thames, and that is an historical fact that is recorded in print as well as film.
 * I was under the impression that the point of citing proof, was so that the doubters could see the proof for themselves, so I am wondering why you and anyone else hasn't watched the programme, so that you can see the evidence for yourself, when the article has been submitted, with no real evidence such as a patent date, because everything that I have seen, is apocryphal at the best, isn't it???
 * Especially when there's a minute or two of date verifiable film, which shows that bubble gum was being used in the UK thirty years before the supposed invention in the US, and it's just like the widely told and accepted(in the US) lie, that baseball was invented in the US, even though the date quoted is forty years younger than the date of a famous British book was published, wherein the author write about the incredibly popular game of baseball being all the rage….. Jowan Marghak (talk) 16:55, 10 March 2024 (UTC)