User talk:Joy Crawford

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! FloNight  talk   23:06, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

William A. Dembski
Please only place templates suchas undefined on artciles for good reason. Your diagreements betray both a shaky grasp of Neutral point of view and a bias in favour of the article's subject; this makes you read neutral statements as biased. As you seem to have come here only to edit this article, I suspect that you haven't had enough experience of Wikipedia to grasp the situation. Why not try editing other (unrelated) articles, and get a feel for what we're doing, then come back to this? --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 23:12, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Nacon kantari  e |t||c|m 23:23, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Question about Dembski page
Moved text

''Hi, thanks for your welcome! I have a question about the page for William Dembski, intelligent design proponent. It's extremely biased against him and against intelligent design (not NPOV). I've been trying to discuss the problems on the talk page, and I put up a tag saying that the neutrality is disputed. However, a couple of the contributers are unwilling to listen to reason. What should I do?--Joy Crawford 23:13, 28 February 2006 (UTC)''

Hello Joy, welcome to WP. Putting a NPOV tag on before fully discussing the pov problem can be seen as confrontational by some people. Why don't you take it off and discuss your concerns on the talk page for 24 hours? I'll look at the article and make suggestions. FloNight  talk   23:31, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I'll do that. --Joy Crawford 23:33, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

3RR
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for violating WP:3RR. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. KillerChihuahua?!? 00:50, 1 March 2006 (UTC)