User talk:Joyeefam

November 2018
Hello, I'm Longhair. I noticed that you recently removed content from Adrian David Cheok without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Longhair\talk 02:33, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Joyeefam, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.


 * Longhair, what do you think. I actually agree with the removal, since way too much of that stuff relies on Twitter, Medium, and other unreliable stuff. I saw a Wired article and something from Vice, but IMO it was too poorly sourced for a BLP. However, the editor throws around BS about groups of left-wing extremists or whatever, and I'm allergic to that. Do you have any thoughts? Drmies (talk) 03:08, 16 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes, I agree. It's very poorly sourced. I'll remove the edit warring warning from their page. -- Longhair\talk 05:45, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Adrian David Cheok. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. sixty nine  • whaddya want? •  06:51, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

January 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Adrian David Cheok. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 06:13, 4 January 2019 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 07:30, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.