User talk:Joyfulmarlee

Content
I have placed your text here so that you can work on it. We try to write in easy to understand English. A few issues: Maybe work on the text on your talk page until you get things formatted better. Refs to the inside net at the U of Vic are not helpful. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 23:33, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * "Health and human rights are now vital issues of the international community that the use and access to birth control has significantly risen" Was health and human rights not previously a vital issue? And why is this significant with respect to BC access?
 * "relatively new acceptance on the international realm" I am struggling to understand this.
 * You placed this in the section on epidemiology "By 2012 the Every Women Every Child movement had already raised and distributed $10 billion and projected a global commitment of $2.6 to new family planning methods" but it is not epidemiology.
 * We already state this in the paragraph above and with better refs "In the United States the primary contraception use is the pill" Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 23:33, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Text
Accessibility and legality of birth controls is a relatively new acceptance on the international realm, for example, Japan only legalized oral contraceptives in 1999. Health and human rights are now vital issues of the international community that the use and access to birth control has significantly risen to more than 50% since the 1970's Although this rise is significant the unequal distribution is still highly noticeable due to the lack affordability of contraception in developing countries along with other factors (e.g. distance to health facilities, stigmas and restrictions). In the 1990s, the cost of condoms in Ethiopia was 30% of a persons GNP (Gross National Product) and as high at 45% in Burma; in comparison condoms are only 1% in the US and UK.

Contraception accessibility is connected with their efforts to allow women access to what is quoted as “life-saving commodities”. By 2012 the Every Women Every Child movement had already raised and distributed $10 billion and projected a global commitment of $2.6 to new family planning methods. Even with all of that funding, the world is still not on track to meeting the MDG 4 goals for 2015; which was to attempt to reduce child deaths by two-thirds. MDG'S goal number 5B is “Achieve Universal Access to Reproductive Health”. It targets family planning, contraception use and antenatal health care within developing countries, but Official Development Assistance (ODA) remains low while the need is rapidly rising.

Although the focus of the MDGs is to promote women's equality even when access to contraceptives, such as condoms, may be available, ones partners may refuse to agree to use; less then 10% of married women in Africa used modern contraceptives in 2000 census. In the United States the primary contraception use is the pill, studies show in Africa women preference is contraception injections; however, injection contraception tends to be more often out of date or out of stock in clinics. From 1992-2002, 48% of contraception that was funded was male condoms

Tone
We use a factual encyclopedic tone. This is not really either "Along with funding and assistance, the spread of education on birth control to both men and women is extremely important factor that needs to be promoted. " Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 23:35, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Another useful source for editing is WP:MEDHOW. Additionally please read through the entire article before you make additions. Some of the content was already in the article. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 23:36, 26 September 2013 (UTC)