User talk:Joyprice7

Welcome!

Hello, Joyprice7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Mark Gilmartin, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ... disco spinster   talk  00:50, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Mark Gilmartin


The article Mark Gilmartin has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not meet criteria of WP:BIO or WP:ATHLETE as he has only won state-wide golf tournaments, not national ones.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... disco spinster   talk  00:50, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Mark Gilmartin for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Gilmartin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mark Gilmartin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ... disco spinster   talk  16:29, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Mark Gilmartin
I think with the new references you added it's getting closer to establishing notability. If the article gets deleted I can move it to your userspace so you can keep working on it. Getting as many such references as you can will go a long way to having it kept the next time. ... disco spinster   talk  17:47, 2 July 2011 (UTC) Thank you very much! Great news. Is there any way you could move it to my userspace as previously mentioned? Looks like it was deleted... I will keep working on it and repost once I feel that it's up to standard. Thanks again for all the help! Joyprice7 (talk)joyprice7

Proposed deletion of Conditional rebate


The article Conditional rebate has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unsourced since 2011 and essentially a dictionary definition."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 07:40, 11 June 2019 (UTC)