User talk:Jp3000

March 2009
Please read WP:SPAM. Generally a company is allowed a single external link to their official page. Also read information about conflict of interest. WP:COI

The easiest way for you to proceed would be to find existing Wikipedia articles about similar companies -- that are not tagged for improvement -- and entirely rewrite Chiq consultants to resemble them. Otherwise, other editors will add more tags, and possibly recommend the entire article for deletion.

Please do not replace the external links -- as a whole they aren't even remotely defensible, and replacing them will result in formal warnings, and then possibly, blocking. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia owned by the Wikimedia Foundation, and it's necessary to follow their guidelines to contribute. Thanks, Piano non troppo (talk) 10:25, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chiq consultants
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Chiq consultants, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:CORP due to lack of significant coverage in reliable independent sources. About 70 Google hits but most of it is self-promotional - Twitter, YouTube, MySpace, Facebook, blogspot, etc. Nothing in Google News. There's a lot of name dropping in the article, but none of it is sourced, and simply having notable people come to your their parties doesn't make the behind the scenes event planner notable.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Dawn Bard (talk) 20:24, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
It appears that you may have a conflict of interest, creating and editing Chiq consultants. See WP:CONFLICT. Quoting from there, I am asking you to explain your interests: "Editors with COIs are strongly encouraged to declare their interests, both on their user pages and on the talk page of any article they edit, particularly if those edits may be contested." Piano non troppo (talk) 23:39, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

May 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Chiq consultants has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Laurent (talk) 14:00, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chiq consultants
A tag has been placed on Chiq consultants requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Laurent (talk) 15:56, 17 May 2009 (UTC)