User talk:Jp347

Just waiting for somebody to comment, so take it away:

Cullum
Hi! FYI, that "Cullum" thing wasn't a substub. It was a newbie experiment, sandbox refugee, vandal bot listing or all three. Feel free to tag stuff like that with in the future. Good luck in your studies!! - Lucky 6.9 23:40, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Bournemouth
I reverted because I didn't consider the edits to be an improvement / encyclopedic. The edits were basically only prose rather than content changes, and IMO they made the prose worse. Joe D (t) 21:17, 10 May 2005 (UTC)


 * Looks good now, thanks. Joe D (t) 21:47, 10 May 2005 (UTC)

Trolleybus
I took the image off the Trolleybus article because I deleted the image off Wikipedia as a Possibly Unfree Image. It looks like an image of the same name is on the Commons (which I did not see) and is available, so reverting the edit is the right thing to do. --Thanks Nv8200p (talk) 20:35, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

Large Scale Online
Hi, I see you put back an external link to Large Scale Online on the Garden railway page. While this is a good site, unfortunately most of its content is only available if you pay a subscription, and Wikipedia has an explicit policy of not linking to such sites - see Policy Page. Just wanted to leave you a note explaining why LSO can't be linked from that page. All the best, Gwernol 18:31, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Church bell ringer
Hello, JP,

I just stumbled across you as you edited one of the pages I watch. I just came by to say hello, as I noticed that you are a church bell ringer. I am, too, though not likely the kind that you ring. I am a verger at a cathedral, and peal and toll our wonderful bell the Great Matthew. It weighs 1500 pounds. I have, however, observed the bell ringers as you, and have great respect for your work. Anyway, just a friendly hello....

Sarum blue 21:34, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

WP:CVU status
The Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to and/or  status. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU. Thank you. Delivered on behalf of user:xaosflux 01:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Pedodontics
A tag has been placed on Pedodontics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 01:54, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Cambridge meetup
The second Cambridge meetup is confirmed for this Saturday, 3pm, at CB2 on Norfolk Street: Meetup/Cambridge 2. Hope to see you there. Charles Matthews (talk) 15:40, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)