User talk:Jpg1954

Belated welcome

 * }
 * p.s. I've responded at Talk:Computer virus. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 03:38, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:25, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

exasperation
I just posted reply to another editor on my user page that may be the end of trying to contribute -- sorry Michael P. Barnett (talk) 04:30, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

day after
Thanks for your encouragement. My user discussion just got branched to the extent I thought it least confusing to reply here. In view of Johnuniq's reply there, I am following it with a low key explanation of concerns concerning WP verifiability -- NOT opposing it, but asking how it can be strengthened. I will email the Crystal Growth society and journal people about putting the Bill Bardsley piece somewhere more formal. If I set up a recollections site it would be supplementary -- I will not give up the WP role -- only mentions of Malvern / RRE non substantive -- and I would let you know. I am concentrating on Coulson and Wilkins articles now. Michael P. Barnett (talk) 21:57, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Hetepheres I
I will give my comments and thoughts on the Hetepheres talkpage. I agree with the comment about "hotly debated" issues. Seems a bit much and could be expressed better. Including Reisner's report sounds good. But giving some weight to more modern scholarship is the way to go I think. --AnnekeBart (talk) 00:05, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I made some changes in the article and added more references.--AnnekeBart (talk) 01:04, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

TRE history
I put a substantive paragraph and a meta-paragraph in the TRE Discussion page as result of chance observation of Reg Jones book in public library. I have a couple of articles with higher priority for me than the dog work on what RRE people did, and these have been put into temporary limbo by hair splitting wiki-legalisms, and the "people cannot be mentioned unless they are wikipedia notable gambit". Was the construction of the Gunn biography an atypically happy WP experience? I will look on my user page for comment Michael P. Barnett (talk) 21:54, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

I have no idea if this is typical, as it is the first one I have made a major contribution to (others have been small points).

I suspect it has a lot to do with how many different people have a sense of "ownership" of the subject/article.

It will be interesting to see what happens as a result of Gyromagician's request for formal review. Jpg1954 (talk) 01:51, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

I just put material into TRE and some comments in RRE for merger. Having a rough time with other articles. Michael P. Barnett (talk) 02:07, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
FYI Kudpung (talk) 16:33, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

info
Requests for adminship/Kudpung —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.36.206.140 (talk) 00:49, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Hi Jpg1954. I just want  you  to  be sure that I  know nothing  about  the above link and who  posted it. It geolocates to New Jersey and it  may  have been sent  in  good faith as it seems to  have been sent  to  a number of editors who  have worked on the same articles asyou  and I have. My RfA isn't  going  as well  as expected,  but  in the light  of the unsigned canvassing, it's probably  best  you  stay away  from it. Regards, --Kudpung (talk) 08:15, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Interesting. I assumed it was some sort of normal notification process. The "unsigned" did not register as a red flag. Good luck.Jpg1954 (talk) 23:01, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Ridley–Watkins–Hilsum theory and Gunn effect articles
Will try to follow up on Wednesday. Michael P. Barnett (talk) 20:35, 30 May 2011 (UTC) If you could email me, it would make it very much easier for me to help get authoritative closure on these. I can be tracked down very easily. Michael P. Barnett (talk) 21:16, 30 May 2011 (UTC) Done Jpg1954 (talk) 21:22, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Colwich church name
Many thanks - yes, you're right, it should be St. Michael and All Angels and I have amended the articles accordingly.

Robocoppster (talk) 08:43, 11 July 2014 (UTC)Robocoppster

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry de la River has been accepted
 Henry de la River, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SwisterTwister  talk  07:39, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Henry_de_la_River help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Meacham 50th Anniversary Color 002.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Meacham 50th Anniversary Color 002.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Felix QW (talk) 20:30, 23 June 2023 (UTC)