User talk:Jprw

Deletion discussion about Liverpool vs Dynamo Bucharest 1984 European Cup Semi Final
Hello, Jprw,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Liverpool vs Dynamo Bucharest 1984 European Cup Semi Final should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Liverpool vs Dynamo Bucharest 1984 European Cup Semi Final.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

TheLongTone (talk) 15:55, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

"Liverpool vs. Dinamo Bucharest, 1984 European Cup Semi-Final" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Liverpool vs. Dinamo Bucharest, 1984 European Cup Semi-Final. Since you had some involvement with the Liverpool vs. Dinamo Bucharest, 1984 European Cup Semi-Final redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Robofish (talk) 11:03, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Liverpool vs. Dinamo Bucharest (1983–84 European Cup semi-final)
Hello, Jprw,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Liverpool vs Dinamo Bucharest (1983–84 European Cup Semi Final) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Liverpool vs. Dinamo Bucharest (1983–84 European Cup semi-final).

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

NapHit (talk) 22:36, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Judith Butler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Douglas Murray. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you hadn't realised 😊 Jprw (talk) 09:32, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Liverpool vs Dynamo Bucharest 1984 European Cup Semi Final


A tag has been placed on Liverpool vs Dynamo Bucharest 1984 European Cup Semi Final requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Liverpool vs Dynamo Bucharest 1984 European Cup Semi Final. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:17, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

I see that you have now created this page at least three times, and that twice there have been discussions about it, both of which produced unambiguous consensus that it is not suitable for Wikipedia. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and it is essential for editors to accept such clear consensus, even when they personally disagree with it. Please don't continue to try to unilaterally overturn consensus by just ignoring it and restoring what has been decided to be inappropriate. If you do continue in the same way you may be blocked from editing by an administrator. JBW (talk) 14:39, 6 December 2022 (UTC)


 * No, the consensus was far from unambiguous. And let's be clear about the subject matter -- this is an extraordinary and historic sporting tie, which has passed into legend in European Club football. It also featured recently in a documentary on Sky Sports (it is very rare by the way for an individual tie to be accorded its own feature like this), which attests to the fact that it has only grown in prominence and notability since the deletions you cite. The Sky programme was the main reason I decided to reinstate the article. I hope that other editors can exercise their discretion and realise the significance of the tie, and that it is ludicrous for this event not to have its own article, mainly only because it was a semi-final and not a final of a football competition. Dozens of finals in the past 40 years have been forgotten; this tie is still very much making the headlines. Jprw (talk) 14:29, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

I have now found two more deletion discussions for further copies of this article which you have created, under variations on the same title. Considering that you have therefore at least four times re-created the article in straight defiance of consensus, and that you have evaded article protection by slightt changes in title, you are extremely lucky not to have already been indefinitely blocked from editing. JBW (talk) 14:48, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)