User talk:Jpsbhikhi

Removal of clarify template
Hi, why did you remove this clarify template without resolving the issue it raised? This article is already problematic because it's been unsourced for years and nobody has bothered to establish the subject's notability. Keeping confusing content in the article doesn't improve matters. "(Ex President Akal Garh Market Ludhiana)" Does this mean "the former president of the Akal Garh Market in Ludhiana"? If so, then why aren't we saying that instead of just globbing a bunch of words together in a sloppy parenthetical? Also, please note the new discussion on the talk page. I don't know if you are the IP editor who keeps restoring problematic content, or if that's someone you know, or what, but problematic content must be removed from the article, and as it is, the article is in danger of being nominated for deletion. Removing cleanup templates and edit-warring is not going to help. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:33, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Gurcharan Singh Bhikhi (Sidki), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Diffs: Addition of original research. Content must be supported with reliable sources which would likely never include the subjective opinions relatives of the subject who would naturally have a conflict of interest. The fact that you are adamant to keep including unsourced and glaringly subjective content is becoming disruptive and can very likely result in either the article being considered promotional (and being deleted) or your editing privileges being interrupted for repeated submission of problematic content. Wikipedia is not a web hosting site. There are guidelines in place for what content should be included in an encyclopedic article. Your assertions about how much of a "true" Sikh he was, (for example) are not relevant to an encyclopedia. And since you have already delcared a conflict of interest, you are strongly discouraged from editing this article.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:58, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Conflict of interest editing
Hi. You might want to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policy on Conflict of Interest Editing, If you have any published sources on your grandfather's poetry (Punjabi newspaper articles on him are fine), then please add them to the article. Otherwise, the article will likely to be deleted as not being verifiably notable. Feel free to ask questions and thanks. --regentspark (comment) 20:13, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Gurcharan Singh Bhikhi (Sidki) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gurcharan Singh Bhikhi (Sidki) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gurcharan Singh Bhikhi (Sidki) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  12:30, 3 August 2015 (UTC)