User talk:Jqmhelios11

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hail Storm (Coast Redwood) has been accepted
 Hail Storm (Coast Redwood), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Hail_Storm_(Coast_Redwood) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Jeromeenriquez (talk) 17:55, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Hail Storm (Coast Redwood) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hail Storm (Coast Redwood) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — hike395 (talk) 14:57, 4 January 2022 (UTC)


 * A few things to note about the article creation/deletion process:
 * The WP:Article for Creation process is staffed by volunteer editors like you and me. is not an administrator: he looked at your article and at first pass, it seemed ok. Jerome may not have realized that it is failing our general notability guidelines.
 * You're welcome to improve your article so that it passes the notability guidelines: if you can find information that supports the notability of the tree in reliable sources, the article can remain.
 * We went through a similar discussion for Grogan's Fault, which MD Vaden claims is the largest tree in the world. Unfortunately, because all of the information is kept secret, much of Vaden's work is not verifiable, hence cannot be included in Wikipedia.
 * I would encourage you to read the links about Wikipedia's notability, reliable source, and verifiability guidelines. They're central to the way we work here. Thanks! — hike395 (talk) 16:29, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Hail Storm (Coast Redwood). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:03, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi Jqmhelios11! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Hyperion (tree) several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at Talk:Hyperion (tree), please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Please read WP:BRD and make your argument at Talk:Hyperion (tree) instead of repeatedly re-adding your preferred text.. noq (talk) 16:23, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

I am going off this site, permanently. I have no intention of being lynched by an angry mob with an agenda of claiming certified arborists, whose data has been used in publications, is somehow 'unreliable'. Do as you will, but please note that the information I have just linked is read by a lot of people, and nothing you can do to change it. The best you could do is remove all mention from your site, making Wikipedia seem dodgy and outdated (it already has quite the bad reputation in academic circles)


 * Please reconsider staying --- I can't speak for anyone else, but I'm not angry. Wikipedia has a well-established way of building an encyclopedia, and your proposed article doesn't match that. But further contributions from you are welcome! — hike395 (talk) 17:16, 4 January 2022 (UTC)