User talk:Jrclark

Welcome!

Josh Romney
I have proposed this article for merger with Mitt Romney. Please refer to the discussion page for my reasoning and if you would like to make any comments. Mstuczynski (talk) 18:26, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

I have now nominated this article for deletion as we were unable to come to a concensus. You may find the discussion under WP:Articles for deletion/Josh Romney. Mstuczynski (talk) 22:41, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

re: As it stands now, I believe it qualifies under the Politician guidelines and should remain for the next few weeks.

I understand you are interested in this subject, but if you could point to some aspect of politician qualifications, or basic qualifications where he fits, it would go a long way towards saving the page. Please understand, I have nothing against Romney, but until he is actually notable for something he, himself has done, I feel forced to persue this line of action. Please read Notability is not Temporary. Might I add, I did not want him deleted in the first place. That is why I tagged the article for merger and notified you of my actions. Mstuczynski (talk) 00:42, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

They called me an. The article survives. Congrats. Mstuczynski (talk) 16:52, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Josh Romney
An editor has nominated Josh Romney, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 23:00, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Vertical drop
Thanks for the heads up. Jrclark, I think it would be good for everyone involved if the vertical drop issue could be brought to the Wiki ski project page & aired out there. Perhaps you could copy and paste your conversation with the person you were communicating with onto that project discussion page. With regard to Nhguardian and potential sock puppets, as you can see from my post to that user, I'm aware of that possibility. I'm withholding my own judgment on the matter until I see how Willdakunta conducts him/herself. If s/he resorts to edit warring and POV pushing instead of working for consensus, then, obviously, the sockpuppeting conclusion will be very difficult to refute. At this point, however, I see no reason not to give this username the benefit of a doubt & wait to see what happens. As for the vertical drop changes s/he has made, I asked him/her to refrain and instead bring the issue to the Wiki ski project page. His/her willingness to do so, and seek consensus, will, again go a long way in determining the origin of his/her edits. --Pgagnon999 (talk) 16:06, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Looks like the ANI and SSP reports have come to fruition; the user and all socks have been blocked; two of them indefinately. This should form a good basis for dealing with any further abuse from this user. --Pgagnon999 (talk) 00:57, 3 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, indeed...thank you again for your help. Just FYI, there's a slight chance I might do either a long Pocumtuck Range hike or a short one in the near future - are there any other photos you need for that project?  Jrclark (talk) 02:05, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Mount Raimer
Do you know anything about the defunct ski area on Mount Raimer?--Pgagnon999 (talk) 03:40, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Nothing in particular. I hiked that trail a few years ago & just wrote an article about the mountain; thought it would be good to have info on the previous ski area. Thanks!--Pgagnon999 (talk) 04:18, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * thanks; the photo looks good.--Pgagnon999 (talk) 22:23, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Mt. Whittier ski area
Is it Mt. Whittier or Mount Whittier?--Pgagnon999 (talk) 13:58, 5 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The ski area almost always called itself Mt. Whittier (I spent awhile asking myself the same question and researching through the Whittier stuff I own before I created the article). Of course, it's not located on the real Mount Whittier, which is northwest of the ski area.  Jrclark (talk) 14:49, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

NELSAP prepositions ...
Yes, I have trouble on them - er, in them - er, with them. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 17:41, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * :) Jrclark (talk) 18:13, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Swimmin' in a fish bowl
Actually, the overall music on both looks to be the same; just that its distributed differently across sides of the cartridge. indopug (talk) 23:07, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Charles Minot Dole
You're welcome, and thanks for writing the article. I came across the grave markers and photographed them just in case there was an article, and there it was. Cheers! -- Mwanner | Talk 19:23, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of Mackinac Island Ferry Companies
I have nominated List of Mackinac Island Ferry Companies, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/List of Mackinac Island Ferry Companies. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 18:27, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Wait for Me (Moby album)
I have nominated Wait for Me (Moby album), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Wait for Me (Moby album). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. – Dream out loud (talk) 17:54, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Petersburg-2002-0309d.jpg
File:Petersburg-2002-0309d.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Mount Raimer 2002.JPG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 18:44, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Southsugarloafprofile.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Southsugarloafprofile.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:23, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Haystack-2006-0625a.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Haystack-2006-0625a.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:52, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Oak
For most bands or musical ensembles, they must have released albums for them to be notable and significant. In this case, they are yet to release an album. Perhaps, as of now, we can merge any useful info from Oak to Joplin's. --Efe (talk) 00:41, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Cold case
What cold case legislation did you mean in this post?  Sp in ni ng  Spark  23:29, 17 May 2009 (UTC)


 * SpinningSpark, I haven't searched Wiki for it, but the New Hampshire Senate has been working on creating at Cold Case Unit this month. As such, this half decade old case, which is still fairly well known in NH, is being pushed to the spotlight again.  Jrclark (talk) 01:05, 18 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Oh thanks, I see now. I had misunderstood what you might have meant.  Sp in ni  ng  Spark  21:16, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

The Sleepers
 I'm sorry. I do not seem to have read the contents of the article properly. English Wikipedia was a bot made a false linkage painting |page. In future, try to avoid the kinds of edits. I deleted the English Wikipedia side in an incorrect linkage. Yours sincerely, -Ville Siliämaa (talk) 10:36, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Johnstephennh.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Johnstephennh.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 15:49, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Snow Machines, Inc.


A tag has been placed on Snow Machines, Inc. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 03:45, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Amesbury Sports Park


A tag has been placed on Amesbury Sports Park requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Roger (talk) 19:33, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Amesbury Sports Park for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amesbury Sports Park is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Amesbury Sports Park until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Go  Phightins  !  20:55, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Category:Snow tubing areas in Canada
Category:Snow tubing areas in Canada, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 02:00, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Category:Snow tubing areas in the United States
Category:Snow tubing areas in the United States, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 04:40, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Belknapmtnprofile.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:07, 26 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Berkshire East Ski Area Main Lodge.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:13, 2 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Blackcapprofile.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:33, 9 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Catamount Massachusetts Schoolhouse Monument.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:10, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=615009332 your edit] to Alpine slide may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:44, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
 * * http://www.newenglandskihistory.com/topics/alpineslides.php Alpine Slides in New England[/URL] -

Proposed deletion of Among the Oak & Ash


The article Among the Oak & Ash has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * My searches simply found nothing better than a few passing mentions and Josh Joplin's article also seems questionably notable, this would've been an easy A7 if not for the Verve label but nothing else notable aside from that.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SwisterTwister  talk  06:53, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Dave Ramsey Show


The page The Dave Ramsey Show has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was an orphaned disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguated only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ended in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguated zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * was a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that did not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review. Liz Read! Talk! 21:31, 15 May 2022 (UTC)