User talk:Jrhys4599

October 2015
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Ridge v Baldwin— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   09:03, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ridge v Baldwin with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   09:05, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ridge v Baldwin, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Ridge v Baldwin was changed by Jrhys4599 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.97061 on 2015-10-08T09:33:46+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:33, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Ridge v Baldwin. Super48paul (talk) 09:35, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Materialscientist (talk) 09:56, 8 October 2015 (UTC)