User talk:Jricks22

November 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from FAN:dom Con. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 21:53, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Very sorry about that. Was trying to edit and accidentally deleted it. As for the secondary sources what else is needed? I have seen many similar conventions that have the exact same format and similar references with no warnings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.80.9.142 (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Ziva acclimating to SEA LIFE Arizona.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Ziva acclimating to SEA LIFE Arizona.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 20:51, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Sea Life Arizona
Re your reversion here, in addition to capitalization and formatting problems, the tone of these contributions is not sufficient for inclusion in an encyclopedia as it reads like promotional copy from a corporate brochure. We are not mouthpieces for Sea Life Arizona's marketing department. Phrases like "Ziva was placed in the Tempe aquarium's 161,000 gallon display where she can happily live the rest of her life." and "Ziva continues to live her life at SEA LIFE Arizona where guests from all over the world may come and visit her" are absolutely promotional. The content that I rewrote avoids this problem. Feel free to discuss on the article's talk page. Restoring without consensus, however, is disruptive. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:41, 4 August 2015 (UTC)