User talk:Jrose6

Welcome. I just wanted to make sure you noticed the message on Talk:Moshav Matityahu. Thanks! --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 05:22, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Marketing Action Optimization


A tag has been placed on Marketing Action Optimization requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CharlieDelta (talk) 09:08, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Why the article was deleted
While not all the material in Marketing Action Optimization was a direct copy and paste, far too much of it was. -- SPhilbrick (Talk)  13:32, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Additions of http://.optimove.com
Please stop. If you continue spamming Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.--Hu12 (talk) 01:05, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Hello Jrose6. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice. Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   . If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Citobun (talk) 10:50, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using Wikipedia for advertising or promotional purposes. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:04, 24 February 2016 (UTC)


 * I've just checked your article Marketing Action Optimization, which was deleted as a copyright violation, and in addition to that problem it was written in marketing speak too. Marketing copy, even if it isn't a copyright violation, has no place in an encyclopedia. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:02, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh, and it was taken from guess where? Yes, the Optimove site. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:10, 7 March 2016 (UTC)