User talk:Jrphayes/Archive Jan 2008

Vandalism
Please do, I chose the wrong warning. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 17:14, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: Reverted your edit
Fair enough, I hadn't found that page, thanks for the up! // F  9  T  14:36, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

London Meetup - January 12, 2008
Hi! There's going to be a London Wikipedia Meetup coming Saturday January 12, 2008. If you are interested in coming along take part in the discussion over at Meetup/London7. The discussion is going on until tomorrow evening and the official location and time will be published at the same page late Thursday or early Friday. Hope to see you Saturday, Poeloq (talk) 02:38, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Fernando Torres
Hey, about a month ago (sorry I'm only saying this now, I haven't logged on) you left a vandalism on my talk page, saying that I vandalized the Fernando Torres article. At first I thought I never made any edits to that site anyway, but when I checked the history of that article I found that I had. I never vandalized it, though; all I did was revert it from the previous edit which in itself was vandalism. Check it yourself, the edit before mine was complete vandalism and I just reverted it, so why did you leave a note of a vandalism on my page? Xioyux (talk) 16:38, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Germany Invitation
--Zeitgespenst (talk) 20:06, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Martin Škrtel
Hi! I want to discuss your recent edit to Martin Škrtel. You removed parts of text from the article on the basis that information is in infobox too. This is not, however, a valid reason for removal since the role of infobox is to dublicate most important information from the text. You can read purpose section at Template:Infobox Football biography and discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football. Would you be so kind to revert your removal?  Jhony  |   Talk   18:27, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I have an impression that I offended you, so I do apologise. We are two who are interested in improving Martin Škrtel, so maybe the best place to discuss expansions and deletions is our talk pages or, preferably, Talk:Martin Škrtel. In this particular case: who cares about the section, just bring sentences back. :) It was not a libel, so I can't see how presence of this sentences will make article worse. And yes, surely any section of the article is unfinished stuff, but "deleting of "unfinished" stuff can often greatly hinder the eventual creation of "finished" stuff" (c)(source) :)   Jhony   |   Talk   21:19, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, you've already done it. Anyway, I want to hear your thoughts.   Jhony   |   Talk   21:25, 29 January 2008 (UTC)