User talk:Jruss19

Moved work back
I've moved your article back to User:Jruss19/sandbox for several reasons:


 * Content discussing how Diderot covers sexuality in Supplément au voyage de Bougainville should be covered in the article for the work itself, not as a separate article, especially as the main article is so small.
 * Parts of this are unsourced, such as " Diderot’s critique of 18th century French society, especially its rules controlling human sexuality, can especially be seen in the Supplément au Voyage de Bougainville." Unsourced claims can be viewed as original research or things that you came up with on your own, which should not be in the article. We can only summarize what has already been explicitly stated in the source material, not create new research or include our own interpretations. Avoid "if... then..." or "if... thus..." statements unless they're clearly attributed, which brings up the next point:
 * All claims need to be attributed to the person(s) making the claim. It looks like most of this was likely taken from sources that discussed the topic of sexuality in Supplément au voyage de Bougainville, but it needs to be attributed to these specific authors by way of "According to..." or "John Smith argues that...". It looks like you did this with some of the material, but this should generally be done with anything that could be seen as a major or controversial claim.

Let me know if you have any questions. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 00:39, 1 December 2018 (UTC)