User talk:Js20030

October 2014
Hello, I'm TheMesquito. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Carmelita Jeter, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TheMesquito buzz  00:16, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm going to chime in here too. To make it clear, from the IAAF cited source; of the top 10 times ever run, Jeter has three of them, #4, #6 and =#7.  There is a 4 way tie for #7, 10.70, which fills out the 10.  FloJo has #1, #2, #3 and =#7.  So she ran "wind legal" faster than Jeter's best on three occasions in two different locations.  Until you source the official disqualification of FloJo's history, which is highly unlikely at this late date, Jeter is #2  You are in danger of violating the WP:3RR which is pointless, it just isn't the fact. Trackinfo (talk) 03:06, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Chief Kickingstallionsims
Hello! Your submission of Chief Kickingstallionsims at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:13, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Chief Kickingstallionsims
&mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 23:13, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Carmelita Jeter
Template:Carmelita Jeter has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. SFB 18:03, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Zuzka Light
Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Deb (talk) 12:13, 13 October 2018 (UTC)