User talk:Jschnur/Archive 3

Xxplosive
Hi, while there may not be a source, I actually work as a sampling producer, you can A and B each of the two songs side by side and it's CLEAR one was pulled from the other. The source is each release of the two songs. The songs are the source. — Preceding unsignedcomment added by 76.175.169.95 (talk) 18:13, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

November 2012
dear friend there was a discussion about the notability of the book. the whole discussion and the result is here: Articles for deletion/Fundamental astronomy book. I mentioned the reasons why this book is notable. please edit the it the best way you think and write it back there! regardsGshahali (talk) 03:13, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Dear editor, I am not disputing the notability of the book, but the fact that wikipedia references it 162 times is not in itself notable (Wikipedia itself is NOT a reliable source) and smacks of a circular argument. I will tag the article for improvement, especially the citations. Thank you for taking the time to discuss this with me. Regards.Jschnur (talk) 03:22, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Processing (programming language)
While I agree with the reversion of the specific text, I believe the attempted change by to the article does have a basis in fact (and I don't think it was a "test" at all!)

The "Processing language" (which I've been teaching for several semesters in our "Intro. to Programming" course) is not really a "language" at all; it actually uses pure Java statements, which are fed thru a pre-processor and linked to some libraries. Therefore, the addition made by the other editor (with whom I have no connection, whatever) was neither unjustified nor inaccurate (but stylistically wanting), and perhaps the issue should be addressed. Tripodics (talk) 16:30, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Tripodics, Thank you for your interest in this and sorry for the delayed response. I am a programmer myself and I agree with the assertion that it is not a true language. Of course I reverted the IPs edit on the basis that it was styled as a comment better suited to the talk page. My edit summary should have reflected this and I will aim to be more precise in future. If you feel inclined please edit the article to reflect your thoughts as above. If you don't, I might have a go myself when I get a chance. Best regards Jschnur (talk) 00:25, 17 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi, Jschnur. Thanks for your message.  Go ahead and make the changes, if you wish.  I depart in a few hours (flying from LI to CA, for a week in Silicon Valley), and then I'll be preparing and grading final exams, so I doubt I'll get around to it this year!  Chapter 23 of Schiffman's book is a good reference; in it, he shows how Processing code gets some boilerplate wrapped around it (and also gets "public" inserted before every function), before being piped on to javac.  Best regards.Tripodics (talk) 01:53, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Power Rangers Megaforce
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Power Rangers Megaforce. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.''— RFC&#32;bot (talk) 22:15, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Rosie O'Donnell
I'm pretty sure I did, the source was http://www.myspace.com/yellowperils/videos/video/4680833 60.224.160.192 (talk) 05:29, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, Can you find a better source? MySpace is not generally considered a reliable source (see WP:BLPSOURCES). Best Jschnur (talk) 05:38, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

It's removed from youtube now. 60.224.160.192 (talk) 05:54, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Optical Express
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Optical Express. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please seesuggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 17:16, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Birmingham Gay Village
I am unsure why it is OK for a bar to place the following completely biased comment 'is now seen as the premier night spot' with no citation or evidence to state why this is the case (a blatant advert) but if it is changed to say 'is not seen as the premier night spot' based on my completely biased opinion, with no citation, causes you an issue? Odd. — Preceding unsigned comment added by78.145.52.142 (talk) 22:11, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually I agree with you, It is unsubstantiated puffery. Although in my defence the passage had a citation needed template against it. I've removed the line now. Jschnur (talk)

offensive remark removed. Jschnur (talk) 22:29, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for removing it. I planned to do it but i have multiple projects and you saved me a possible edit war with anonymous IPs who may be affiliated with some of those bars. Again, THANK YOU and have a nice day/eveningツ Je no va  20 (email) 22:36, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * And likewise to you :) Jschnur (talk) 22:44, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for undoing my "correction" on bmp-article
I really thought i corrected it, but i was wrong. Thanks for pointing that out. This is what i'm talking about: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BMP_file_format&diff=524256169&oldid=523572708 — Preceding unsigned comment added by193.170.227.133 (talk) 21:48, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * No problems. This stuff can be tricky. And thanks for trying to make wikipedia better. Best.Jschnur (talk) 22:53, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Billy Bragg
Hi, to validly contravene your accusation of impartiality I've now included a direct quote from BB which demonstrates he advocates political violence. It is important to flag people on Wikipedia who advocate violence, so I ask that you now respect and leave unaltered my bringing this fact to light. Best Wishes

Please comment on Talk:Dick Grayson
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Dick Grayson. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please seesuggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 12:16, 24 November 2012 (UTC) hello — Preceding unsigned comment added byPgray195 (talk • contribs) 23:43, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:State of Louisiana v. Frisard
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:State of Louisiana v. Frisard. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 07:15, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandalism, I appreciate it. Go Phightins  !  23:13, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * NP :-) Jschnur (talk) 23:14, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Publishers Clearing House (PCH)
Don't understand reason for removal. PCH is known for mail orders, and the previous 5 paragraphs all highlight its acquisitions of social media sites. Clicking the link to any of the sites shows that PCH is pushing it's sweepstakes. Should I copy language from one of the websites and use that?Bilbobag (talk) 23:27, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Bilbobag. On reflection I have partially reinstated your edit. My apologies. I left out the bit about the odds which seemed redundant and US centric. I hope that's OK. Best regards Jschnur (talk) 23:38, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for explanation. Bilbobag (talk) 13:58, 30 November 2012 (UTC) I do think the comment about odds relative to US population is relevant. The sweepstakes mentioned is only open to US residents. Canada and UK have separate sweeps. I believe the odds comment should be re-instated, since it puts the odds into perspective that most people can understand.Bilbobag (talk) 14:04, 30 November 2012 (UTC) Disregard - I was mistaken, Sorry.Bilbobag (talk) 14:09, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for the message about the elevator thing. That was my friend messing around. Sorry! — Preceding unsigned comment added by66.75.247.128 (talk) 06:29, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Art Pope
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Art Pope. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please seesuggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 01:34, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Paul Watson
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Paul Watson. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please seesuggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 20:17, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of unrecognized higher education accreditation organizations
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of unrecognized higher education accreditation organizations. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 15:15, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Anton Kuivanen
Hello, I saw that you reverted vandalism on article about Anton Kuivanen. There is still some incorrect info on that article and I didn't know exactly how to report it and decided to notice about them this way. If you could look into it and revert the article back to normal? Thanks! 130.234.207.176(talk) 18:28, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the note. I will look into it soon when I get the chance. Jschnur (talk) 23:46, 9 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Dear 130.234.207.176 (talk), I am definitely not an expert in this area. I reverted what was obvious vandalism. If you can point out what info is still incorrect I will be happy to fix it. Otherwise feel free to fix it yourself. If you do, make sure you provide an edit summary explaining why you are changing the article. This will help to prevent your changes from being mistaken for vandalism. Best regards. Jschnur (talk) 00:01, 10 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi, the article is a OK now, it was reverted back to how it was before one or two schmucks laid their hands on to it. Thanks for this and have a good one d:) 130.234.207.176 (talk) 08:44, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

India and weapons of mass destruction
I clearly provided a linked source next to the new section added. You should have checked it before removing it. Please do not remove referenced material.99.226.203.145 (talk) 00:30, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Also please check the edit I made on top of the article. Wikipedia clearly explains India is currently the top arms importer in the world. This is found on wikipedia itself. Look it up right here. Check before reverting other people's edits. Thanks-99.226.203.145 (talk) 00:34, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I can find no support in the reference in the new section for that assertion. Please link to a reliable source. Regards. Jschnur (talk) 00:41, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi Jschnur
Sorry about the edits, I just want to be funny P.S:I'm not very funny. From: Hicob2978 :)

Please comment on Talk:New York Knicks
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:New York Knicks. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please seesuggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 09:15, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Template:Essays on building Wikipedia ‎
Hi.

I added the essay WP:NOW as it relates to a philosophy of constructing (editing) pages: the idea that the article will improve at some point in the future is not good enough if people are reading it now. I'm a little puzzled as to what error of fact has been made here? Risingrain (talk) 15:26, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Replied at User talk:Risingrain's talk page. Jschnur (talk) 21:58, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * That's fine. Just never doubt me again :D Risingrain (talk) 23:57, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page. --Nlu (talk) 05:52, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * NP :-) Jschnur (talk) 05:54, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Nice!
Thanks for reverting the blanking of my user talk page. You did it pretty quickly. Thanks. :) Ha  dg  er  08:01, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Hehe Quick draw McGraw. Jschnur (talk) 08:04, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rotherham by-election, 2012
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Rotherham by-election, 2012. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 03:16, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

TotP
No; the discusssion will take place- if it takes place at all- on the article talk page. Cheers! You Can Walk Like A&#39;Gyptian ;)  (talk) 11:24, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Are you going to edit every article that mentions Saville and add "and predatory sex offender"? Don't you understand "relevance"? Jschnur (talk) 11:34, 17 December 2012 (UTC)


 * ...are you going to ignore it? It's called cross-referencing; sorry if that's difficult for you.
 * PS: Yes, of course.

You Can Walk Like A&#39;Gyptian ;)  (talk) 11:38, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes well good luck with your crusade. Jschnur (talk) 11:42, 17 December 2012 (UTC)


 * You and your socks have dealt a blow to 3RR already. Do you idolise Jimmy Savile to such an extent that you can't bear to see him criticised outside of one article? Bizarre.
 * PS: On edit, this is from the sister article- 'It was said Savile obtained access to teenage girls through television programmes such as Top of the Pops'. Although not a source, it does (hopefully) demonstrate cross-referncing. Good luck to you!

You Can Walk Like A&#39;Gyptian ;)  (talk) 11:45, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I think Saville was a dirty disgusting old man criminal. But Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a tabloid or a platform for crusaders. And if you think I have sockpuppets, please report me. I find your accusation baseless and offensive. Thanks Jschnur (talk) 11:57, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Buchach
Sorry for so-so english. I saw you edit article about my town - Buchach Article have not many historical facts I want to do the article better I'm from Buchach, I'm Ukrainian. Unfortunatly I haven't own computer and I edit in town's library. My information is from book 'Buchach and arrounds' edited in London on 1972. Please DON'T DESTROIED my work THANK YOU! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.94.67.191 (talk) 14:12, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Conversion therapy
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Conversion therapy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 22:15, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Subotica
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Subotica. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please seesuggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 16:16, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Race and Sport
Hi noticed you re added something I removed from (Race and Sport) that there is inqaulity for Aboriginals in Australian sport. This is untrue, there used be sometime ago but Aboriginals do not get rejected from playing sport in Australia based on their race. The Australian Football League has a (Indigenous Round) that celebrates indigenous Australian's, there is a high number of Aboriginals playing in the (Australian Football League) & the (National Rugby League) and other sports. There hasn't been inqaulity towards Aboriginals in sport in Australia for quite some time.
 * I think you are probably right but it doesn't matter what we think (or know), what matters is that the content you removed was sourced and your assertion is not. Wikipedia depends on reliable secondary sources and not on what we believe to be true. Cheers. Jschnur (talk) 09:32, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Ensworth School
Today I made changes to the Ensworth School listing to correct several incorrect and inflammatory statements about the school. Each of the changes was reverted. Please explain. All of my contributions are completely accurate. All corrections can be verified through the school site (www.ensworth.com). E1958 (talk) 23:21, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Dear E1958, Your edits are being reverted because they looked suspiciously like vandalism. On closer inspection I see that you are in fact editing in good faith and so please accept my apology. I will remove the warnings on your talk page and restore your last edit. For future reference, you can avoid this sort of thing by providing an edit summary explaining why you are removing entire sections and changing previously accepted assertions, and also backing up your edits with inline citations. Again sorry. Happy editing and season's greetings. Jschnur(talk) 23:47, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I see you've already done restored your edits and removed warnings. Jschnur (talk) 23:52, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I really appreciate the quick response and will include an explanation in future edits along with citations when available. Happy Holidays! E1958 (talk) 00:07, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Trademark
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Trademark. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 11:15, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Nemesis63. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Driven to Distraction (Inspector Morse TV-episode), and have un-reviewed it again. If you've got any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Thanks, Nemesis63

Doof
Hi I am the original person that established that page, doof on wikipedia could you restore my edit as I was still in the process of providing quotation and citations, my name is simon roberts http://en.gravatar.com/mynamesnot — Preceding unsigned comment added by203.206.211.29 (talk) 10:05, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, Don't take this too personally but who you are and what you know is not important, what matters is the edits you make are supported by reliable sources and expressed in a neutral and formal style . Additionally, Wikipedia is not a "how to" reference. Its helpful too, if you provide edit summaries that let others know what your intentions are. Thanks Jschnur (talk) 10:36, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Microsoft Office Document Imaging
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Microsoft Office Document Imaging. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 05:41, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Incorrect Naming and Spelling Conventions in Medina
Good Morning

I would like you to kindly look on to this thing and sort it out ....referred websites as much as you can or else to name a few www.ziaislamic.com www.islamqa.info

Making Changes as early as possible and Your Efforts will be appreciated

January 2013
Dear User:Jschnur I Humbly Request you Please don't Remove My Article Malik Liaquat Ali Thank you Sameer Ahmed — Preceding unsigned comment added bySameer.liaquat (talk •contribs) 13:17, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Racism in the Arab world
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Racism in the Arab world. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.''— RFC&#32;bot (talk) 00:16, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Nayirah (testimony)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Nayirah (testimony). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 20:50, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 15:15, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Good articles
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Good articles. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.''— RFC&#32;bot (talk) 10:15, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kyuss
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Kyuss. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please seesuggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 05:15, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Transformers: Prime characters
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Transformers: Prime characters. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 00:16, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Michael Szilágyi
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Michael Szilágyi. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please seesuggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 19:17, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Derby sex gang
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Derby sex gang. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please seesuggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 14:16, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Clerks
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Clerks. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name fromFeedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 08:17, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Thanks :) Jschnur (talk) 04:16, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Herbythyme
Your message to the talkpage for my IP said if i have any questions, to leave them here. So my question is: why do you want to help an abusive sysop who blocks people without good cause? I had barely been on Meta, and was blocked for no good reason after making a userpage. Herbythyme is an example of the worst kind of abusive sysop, and i suspect he does this kind of thing to others. 174.141.213.14 (talk) 03:58, 7 February 2013 (UTC) I'm unable to review my actions in your case because your sock is unavailable to me. Jschnur (talk) 04:17, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * please clarify? I never socked at Meta. What do you mean? 174.141.213.15(talk) 04:27, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Your IP hopping momentarily confused me. I accept that you don't sock at Meta. Still, no excuse for vandalising a user page. Jschnur (talk) 04:41, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * you're correct. My action was borne of frustration, and it was wrong of me to vandalize his/her userpage. Had he or she) not revoked my talkpage access, i could have been more mature in my approach. Anyway, thanks for replying.174.141.213.8 (talk) 04:52, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 03:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
My pleasure Jschnur (talk) 05:23, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Pitch Perfect
My friend. I know you are eager, but please take a moment to review changes before you confirm them. Example here on huggle where the previous edit said "Kiana Jami one of the best actresses gets pregnant AND PUKES ON JAHLIYA" and you fixed "AND PUKES ON JAHLIYA." I would have hoped the line "Kiana Jami one of the best actresses gets pregnant," would give an editor pause and say "does this make sense" and would investigate. As such this crafty vandal buried this edit in a layer of other edits and as such this probably would not have been fixed until much later. Please be diligent and look for key signs that all is not well. Please do contact me with further questions or concerns. Otherwise keep up the hard work! Jab843 (talk) 05:24, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rape and pregnancy controversies in United States elections, 2012
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Rape and pregnancy controversies in United States elections, 2012. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please seesuggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 22:15, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks Slazenger. Also much appreciated. Jschnur (talk) 01:56, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ships
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ships. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 17:16, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Audiometrist article, undoing vandalism
Many thanks for undoing the vandalisim on this article. I have had to undo this again in the meantime. I would appreciate your support if this keeps happening. Since the user is anonymous he/she doesn't have a talk page and I have asked on the article talk page to discuss this further. My own edits on this have already reflected a more worldwide definition, as previous edits from other users either focused entirely on a U.S. or Australian definition, which omitted a UK definition. The English language is the basis for this article and as such the word "audiometrist" is derived from the word "audiometry", although the word audiometry has Latin roots. That is why I included the explanation for why an audiometrist is not the same as an audiologist. The article should focus on audiometry as being distinct from audiology, which becomes unclear from the vandal's deletions. The vandalism also does not include a single citation or internal link. There is no reason why the first paragraph should be deleted in its entirety as I have provided citations and internal links to support this definition. The other paragraphs can be edited or expanded on if the anonymous user has something more constructive to offer than simply vandalism. I appreciate your reversion, thanks. Jodon1971 (talk) 12:14, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Jodon1971, I reverted the IP user's edits because they removed referenced material without sufficient explanation or justification. In addition, as you noted above, the removed text included the important distinction between "Audiology" and "Audiometry". That being said, his/her edits are probably not vandalism in the strict sense used here on wikipedia, more of a content dispute and as such we must be wary of engaging in "edit warring". Anyhow, I have that article on my watchlist and will keep an eye on it. Regards and happy editing. Jschnur (talk) 22:32, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks. There is currently an edit war going on. That user has again made more edits and I have reverted. I have also added that it is disputed on the article page, and I have discussed this at length now on the talk page. I await their response/action. In the meantime I would like you or someone to intervene or offer any suggestions that might help to resolve this. I have also suggested that the article page itself be deleted. Maybe you could give me your thoughts on that after reading the talk page. Thanks. Jodon1971 (talk) 01:15, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I have read your discussion on the talk page. I am against deleting the article which I think as it stands is quite good and well referenced. If the content dispute continues, however, there are other ways to resolve this issue, including a Request for Comment (see WP:RfC) to gain consensus on the article's content or perhaps list the dispute at WP:DR/N. Let's wait and see. Regards. Jschnur (talk) 06:01, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks. That User has reverted again, while responding (unsatisfactorily in my opinion) to my discussion. He/she will probably keep doing this ad infinitum, therefore I will not revert any more and will leave his/her edits in tact until a third Wikipedian opinion is brought in. I tried to explain to the user about the importance of making their material verifiable. You can see the difference between his/her edits and mine. I will have to read up on how to get a third opinion, but hopefully it will be resolved soon. Thanks again for your assistance. Jodon1971(talk) 19:21, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the award! I wasn't expecting that! My first ever Wikipedia award - I think I'm getting goosepimples (Ha ha)! Jodon1971 (talk) 10:24, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Physical determinism
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Physical determinism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 12:16, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Social market economy
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Social market economy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 07:15, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Spinal manipulation
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Spinal manipulation. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 02:15, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Sourcing General Wesley Clark's statement on attacking 7 countries in 5 years
Dear Jschnur, I would like to politely inform you that I properly sourced General Clark's statement. In HTML format, it's: url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ha1rEhovONU

Please comment on Talk:Mama's Family
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mama's Family. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please seesuggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 20:16, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sistar
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Sistar. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please seesuggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 15:16, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

?
'''It is NOT Vandalism. You will be blocked Permanently if you abuse your rights. Please give adequate reason as to why the theory is VALID'''. — Precedingunsigned comment added by 117.225.193.8 (talk) 07:07, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

you're joking, right?
you're joking about cranberry, right? BrandonDuckWorthRox (talk) 13:54, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Frasier episodes
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Frasier episodes. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.''— RFC&#32;bot (talk) 10:16, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Huggle message test
Testing 1 2 3 Jschnur (talk) 12:18, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:LSR
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:LSR. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please seesuggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 09:16, 14 March 2013 (UTC)