User talk:Jschopinsky

peer review
For the lead of this article is does clearly state what the rest of the article will be about. It is not very long and dragged out either. Also the details that are used are necessary to reflect the rest of the article without bogging it down. The lead is organized by a brief description of what the topic is, why its relevant and some specific details that support the rest of the article. The rest of the article does not have much organization to it. The article does not have very much information however the information that the author displayed was all bunched under one category. By reading this article the content does not seem neutral. This is because the author states the importance of something. Meaning the author believes it is important, showing opinion. The sources do seem reliable, they include first hand experiences. I wasn't able to access all of the sources. --Jschopinsky (talk) 19:27, 19 November 2019 (UTC)