User talk:Jsebastian1501

February 2019
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Sergio Esteban Vélez, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''I have decline the speedy-- do not reapply. You may take the artcle back to afd if you want it deleted.''  Dloh cier ekim    (talk) 01:15, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sergio Esteban Vélez. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 01:23, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sergio Esteban Vélez. Dloh cier ekim   (talk) 01:57, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Sergio Esteban Vélez. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 02:00, 21 February 2019 (UTC) That was nice of you, but this has become too disruptive, and I will block for the next occurence. User may AfD the article, but I have already final warned. Dloh cier ekim   (talk) 02:03, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Maybe so, but I was trying to point out that, as they've made 4 reverts, they're lucky to have not already been blocked for 3RR or edit warring. They're probably unaware of those rules, so they need to be made aware. Adam9007 (talk) 02:07, 21 February 2019 (UTC)