User talk:Jselod/Madrepora oculata

Peer Review Notes
Lead: the lead is well-written and provides a good framework for the rest of the article. You could consider adding a section on its role in the deep sea environment (or any other roles it has).

Reproduction section: The information you have is well-written and interesting, however, if there is more existing knowledge about reproduction it would be worth expanding this section. Also, maybe include more sources rather than just the one.

Grammar and spelling: all looks good!

Images: good image choices, they enhance the readers' understanding and the article as a whole

Overall thoughts: Well written, unbiased, clear structure, well organized, sources look reliable. I suggest adding more information (if any exists) such as range and distribution, how/what it eats, the type of environment it needs to thrive, why it's important in a deep sea environment, and a conservation section if applicable. I don't know if the hypertrophy relates to anthropogenic activity/conservation, but it could be interesting to look into. Also, the bottom paragraph of the description section about the mucus is really interesting -- if there is more available info on you could expand there. Annabellebeaton (talk) 16:42, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Peer Review
I have completed my Peer Review for the Madrepora oculata that can be found on the Peer Review Page for this article as listed on WikiEdu. REVPH (talk) 18:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Peer Review
I completed my peer review in a separate peer review page. Here is the link in case you can't find it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jselod/Madrepora_oculata/ExploringTheDeep_Peer_Review. ExploringTheDeep (talk) 22:15, 24 March 2024 (UTC)