User talk:Jsepeta

Image copyright problem with Image:Roland_VariOS.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Roland_VariOS.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:08, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Tatum Reed
You made a well written comment, but it seems like an opinion, rather than a fact. Can you provide a way to rephrase it so it isn't original research? -- AnonEMouse (squeak) 02:48, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Stephen St. Croix (aka Stephen Marshall), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.stephenstcroixgear.com/bio.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Stephen St. Croix (aka Stephen Marshall) and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Stephen St. Croix (aka Stephen Marshall) with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Stephen St. Croix (aka Stephen Marshall).

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Stephen St. Croix (aka Stephen Marshall)/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Stephen St. Croix (aka Stephen Marshall) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Pascal.Tesson 14:50, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

March 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Victoria Jackson, you may be blocked from editing. Jorfer (talk) 14:49, 23 March 2011 (UTC) Not entirely surprised that some people don't value my knowledge. Sorry that you're offended by facts.

Possibly unfree File:The screen savers logo.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The screen savers logo.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:15, 22 May 2013 (UTC) If you cannot prove ownership or copyright over images, should the Web be blank? Most of the images on the internet do not have attribution. Wouldn't you prefer that readers have understanding by looking at pictures?