User talk:Jsfouche/Archive 3

/* Slade */
Hello, I see you have questioned notability on many articles that I have worked on, all articles meet notabilty and are being added to frequently.

From the notability guideline: songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been independently released as a recording by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable. Notability aside, a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album.

No article questioned is a stub, for example Skweeze Me Pleeze Me article has the same amount of information and yet that has not been questioned. Many songs have been a hit in several countries which chart data is shown.

There are also many articles based on singles which have smaller information and have never been questioned such as Queeen's One Year of Love and Pain Is So Close to Pleasure.

Notability of the two non-charting singles - Universe was Slade's last single and there is plenty of information to cover that. Give Us a Goal was used for the popular video game Fifa 09. The rest have charted and have enough information to avoid being labelled as a stub. No one else has questioned this. Ajsmith141 (talk) 12:17, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * To be notable as a stand alone article, songs must generally have multiple verifiable sources to establish their notability individually. The references for most of these articles are only chart listings.  The ones that were covered by other notable artists were not PRODed.   jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 12:26, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Article Confirmation
I've done extensive research on this page and it all seems to check out. I don't understand why you would suggest that it should be removed. His music videos are affiliated with MTV, he has a reality show that has been picked up by the CW network, and he has a music and film deal with Universal. He's the youngest owner ever of a professional basketball team which happens to also be global (ABA) He's also one of Atlanta's top producing real estate agents. He is a socialite and exclusive party promoter in the greater Atlanta area as well. He seems to be extremely notable and worthy of a wikipedia entry as far as I'm concerned. His sites www.AdrianProvost.com and www.PlanetProvost.com are very notable, as well as his charity Life Juice. He's had numerous television appearances and is well known throughout society. I've reviewed plenty of articles on wikipedia and I can not seem to find justification for the deletion of this page, but the inclusion of some of those other articles. It doesn't seem to make sense to me, please help me understand this. I've spent a considerable amount of time researching the subject and even more time in contributing to the article. I would appreciate an explanation in further detail and would like to know the necessary steps to get this included so I don't feel as if I have wasted so much of my time. Thanks - With Kind Regards I Remain.74.166.45.168 (talk) 09:34, 15 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Talk page stalker comments: I've asked the IP to use the AfD discussion page instead of making their case on user talk pages. --bonadea contributions talk 09:38, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive news
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 20:16, 16 January 2011 (UTC).

February 2011 Wikification Drive
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wikiproject Wikify at 00:36, 20 January 2011 (UTC).

XXX (District of Sao Paulo)
I haven't a clue what you're up to with these unnecessary additions of (district of Sao Paulo) to names that are already included in the Category of Districts of Sao Paulo at the foot of the article. It would have been nice if you'd had the courtesy to post a message about your intention at the Talk page first. Opbeith (talk) 23:27, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I thought it was obvious as many of the districts are also subprefectures and bairros. I am expanding the subdivisions of São Paulo, and this creates the need to disambiguate the names so that it is clear if the article is referring to a subprefecture, district, or bairro.  Further, many of these names are municipalities and districts in other Brazilian states.  This method was mimicked from the Portuguese wikipedia.  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 00:19, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikify's Coordinator Election
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 22:23, 23 January 2011 (UTC).

Proposed deletion of Science of unitary human beings


The article Science of unitary human beings has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Purely promotional article in support of a non-notable nursing text book.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Xajaso (talk) 21:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Contested and de-PRODed. Martha Rogers is one of the pre-eminent nursing theorists, and this theory is taught in every nursing program.  The article is clearly not a promotion for the book.  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 23:42, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Fyi
, it was bugging me, hope you don't mind-- Jac 16888 Talk 01:35, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Not a problem! Hopefully they can fix it, or better yet, add it to the standard TW list.  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 03:04, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Template:User Sigma Theta Tau
I do believe you meant "ΣΘΤ". Unless the group in question also uses the erroneous Φ, which wouldn't surprise me. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:55, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Oops!! You're right!  I must've clicked the wrong letter.  Thanks for catching that!!  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 13:28, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

The Wikifier, WikiProject Wikify's First Newsletter (January 2011)
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 02:45, 28 January 2011 (UTC).

DYK nomination of Tietê Bus Terminal
Hello! Your submission of Tietê Bus Terminal at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! PM800 (talk) 08:07, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Palmeiras-Barra Funda Intermodal Terminal
You have a succession template to "preceding" and "following" metro stations, but nothing links back. Is this a metro station or does it just connect to one with another name? Sw2nd (talk) 17:43, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The metro and CPTM stations are contained with this larger intermodal terminal. The metro and CPTM stations are separate, but linked within this massive building.  Does that make sense?  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 18:26, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * This is what is not clear. What is the name of the metro station? Sw2nd (talk) 21:47, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I've found it now. You have two articles about the same facility Palmeiras-Barra Funda Intermodal Terminal and Palmeiras-Barra Funda (São Paulo Metro). That is very confusing since they are not linked in any way, and also show different metro lines, which is why I could not find it. If they are one integrated facility, we only need one article here.  Sw2nd (talk) 18:06, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

The February 2011 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive has begun!
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 00:53, 2 February 2011 (UTC).

GOCE January Backlog elimination drive conclusion
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 15:19, 5 February 2011 (UTC).

DYK for Tietê Bus Terminal
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   18:02, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Randomized clinical trial and nursing research
Hi! I am skeptical about your listing "nursing research" as a general category for the article on randomized trials.

There is overlap, but the article of randomized trials is not contained in the real-world category of nursing research, because such trials are also used by dentists (some of whom are not nurses), etc.: Would you please undo your addition?

(I am a fan of nurses, having come from a line of two nurses and having taught nurses statistics. Let me know if I can help in the future.) Thanks!
 * I think I have cleaned it up. I removed it and then changed "evidence-based medicine" to "evidence-based practice" which encompasses both medicine and nursing, as well as all other fields.  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 23:21, 17 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Your changes looked okay to me. :-)
 * Best regards, Kiefer.Wolfowitz  (Discussion) 01:08, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

The February 2011 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive Needs Your Help!
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 04:11, 24 February 2011 (UTC).

March 2011 Backlog Elimination Drive
Hi. On behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors, I am inviting you to sign up for our March Backlog Elimination Drive. Win a barnstar! It's fun. -- Diannaa (Talk) 01:23, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikify's March Mini Drive
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 04:04, 9 March 2011 (UTC).

Category: Psychiatric nursing
Thanks for the delete on this and related categories. Unfortunately, I missed the before I created it. FiachraByrne (talk) 00:57, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I misread things. There is no such category. I'm going to stick a "hang on" on the speedy deletion proposal. There needs to be a simple and intuitive pathway to get from category: psychiatry to category: psychiatric nursing. FiachraByrne (talk) 01:27, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Res ipsa loquitur in the United States
I agree with your rationale, but I hope this can be expanded. Would you agree with me to userfy it? Bearian (talk) 21:32, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, I think that is appropriate. jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 02:31, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for the compliment, I'll reward it.



The Master of Mayhem has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Hope you enjoy it! --The Master of Mayhem 20:04, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Aorn logo.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Aorn logo.gif. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:06, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Lots o' templates
About this edit: I certainly don't disagree, nor do I mind, just wondering whether you thought the two templates I'd already applied were somehow inadequate. The user had not edited since I applied those 15 hours earlier. If you simply thought it was worth repeating, I won't disagree. -- Scray (talk) 22:20, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I only left it because it was not only against the username policy, but also a conflict of interest. The template you left did not mention the COI issue.  COI issues get more attention from Admins.  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 01:56, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:41, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Neontatal intensive care unit
Hello Jsfouche. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Neontatal intensive care unit, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a recently created redirect - consider WP:RfD. Thank you. Salvio Let's talk about it! 02:18, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

The Wikifier: March 2011
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 01:51, 16 May 2011 (UTC).

June 2011 Wikification Drive
Sumsum2010 · T · C 04:12, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

RAPs recently changed to RUGs, Resource Utilization Groups. This changed when MDS 3.0 was implemented October 1st, 2010. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.213.24.141 (talk) 19:46, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

CSD on The Unbeatable Maze Game
hi Jsfouche, no problem with removing the csd, i tagged it with 'no context' because i cant tell what its about it appears to be just a generic statement about an imaginary maze game, maybe db-hoax would have been better. but anyway the prod should clear things up. cheers -- The Elves Of Dunsimore (talk) 03:00, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Legal Nurse Consultant
I am sorry if I have sent this message twice.

Yesterday I added a link to the resource box of the Legal Nurse Consultant page which you removed.

I added the site because it was the only neutral resource I can find about the legal nurse consultant field.

The organizations listed are rumored to be a scam ring of connected sites seeking money from prospective legal nurse consultants including NALNC.org See nalnc.info/.../warrant-issued-for-the-arrest-of-nalnc-operator-and-owner-of-nalnc.org, this LNC group on linked in http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Beware-these-scammers-if-youre-1525047.S.46621055?qid=39344144-dec9-413a-9fce-5d112fba248a&goback=.gmp_1525047 for reference.

The contact information provided on such sites is unverifiable and fake.

I do not think it is fair that you removed the one link that does not ask for money, but provides free resources. I have re-added it and hope you do not remove it again.

Anyabows (talk) 13:43, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The link is to a website that is designed to tell users how to become a LNC. External links are designed to give more information about a subject, not to tell someone how to "become" something.  If the website were designed more about what a LNC does and how the field was developed it would be fine.  It is primarily a blog site.  For more information about appropriate links, see WP:ELNO.  The other links are to professional organizations.  I hope that helps explain the difference.   jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 21:27, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Tobias Hoheisel new page
Refs now added. Hope this is OK now. Victorianistjaf (talk) 15:41, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Talkback|Fermanagh Orangeism — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fermanagh orangeism (talk • contribs) 17:27, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Controlled language in MT
Good evening, I don't understand why my article "controlled language in MT" was removed. I think this article contains important and evaluated information and references was cited according to ISO. Therefore I don't think that I violated wikipedia rules. So I would like to know why this article was erased. Please give me an explanation of it.

Thank you very much.

Yours sincerely.--Emagaldu (talk) 18:23, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The article was not deleted. It was simply moved to a more descriptive title: Controlled language in machine translation.   jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 18:26, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Neovandalism
The new page neovandalism is not a hoax or vandalism, nor should it be categorized as G3. It is a serious and relevant topic. Kindly revise your comments and allow several weeks of civil discussion. --To_Expand_Tolerance_ 18:44, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Your RfA
The opposers at your RfA are opposing for the most ridiculous reasons and I hope some more rational editors will support you soon. Opposing a candidate for something that happened 5 and 6 months ago that is done per policy is beyond comprehension for me. I truly hope this passes, but if not, that you don't get discouraged.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  22:05, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Best of luck. Airplaneman   ✈  23:33, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * P.S. How do you pronounce your username? Airplaneman   ✈  23:34, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * It appears to be the initials of his first and middle names followed by his last name.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  23:37, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, guys! I know that some of these RfAs can get rough.  I expect to have every edit scrutinized.  I appreciate your support.  Airplaneman, the "Js" are my first and middle initial, the "fouche" is my last name, and it rhymes with "ouch."  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 23:41, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The only blunder I can really see was the PROD spamming. Dunno why so many people are jumping to oppose.... Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:57, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * People like to pile on  without  doing their own  research. In  a perfect world, one oppose !vote per single incident would be enough, but  this is not  possible. Nevertheless, as my  own  RfA has shown, it's early  days yet, so  there is no reason for Fouche to  get  discouraged. He is answering  the questions well.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:04, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the encouragement. Perhaps the next few days will yield better luck.  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 04:41, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Reaper, I was disappointed that your support was moved to oppose. I fully grasp the concept of verifiability, but the articles listed on the RfA page were all either stubs or lists.  A few of them, I added a reference section, but forgot to add the tags.  The policy on verifiability is essential.  The policy itself makes it clear when verifiability is required: "In practice you do not need to attribute everything. This policy requires that all quotations and anything challenged or likely to be challenged be attributed in the form of an inline citation that directly supports the material."  While I agree that sources are needed, articles on geographic regions and metro stations are very unlikely to be challenged.  I have since corrected the absence of the references.  I do hope that you consider that my clean, excellent track record at NPP speaks volumes about my understanding policy.  These are the areas that I indicated that I wanted to work with once I become an Admin.  At any rate, I appreciate your candor and comments.  Cheers!!   jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 17:47, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I was sorry to have to remove my support, but all articles must be referenced. I understand that nobody is likely to challenge an unreferenced stub on a metro, but then again, by the same token, anybody could create a hoax article that would also not be challenged. That was what I was referring to when I mentioned violation of WP:V.
 * That said, I will be happy to support in another couple months if no more unreferenced articles are created and many of the existing ones are fixed. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:32, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * That said, I will be happy to support in another couple months if no more unreferenced articles are created and many of the existing ones are fixed. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:32, 5 June 2011 (UTC)


 * I've just closed your RfA, and regret to inform you that I did not find sufficient consensus to promote at this time. To your credit, most of those in opposition indicated they would be sympathetic to a future request after taking their comments into consideration. Thank you for your offer to serve as an administrator. – xeno talk 18:49, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry to see it fail. Just for the record, I would have voted for you in your RFA. I was planning to when I came home today but it was already closed :(-- White Shadows Stuck in square one 23:17, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Don't let it get you down. As Xeno points out, even the opposers still think you're doing pretty good work around here. Pichpich (talk) 02:30, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, guys!! You all are great!!  Every time an oppose vote would come in, I got discouraged.  Then I would go back and read all the really wonderful things in the support section, and I would feel awesome!  Being supported by such wonderful editors has made the experience an overall positive!  I will continue to do my pen work, and hope that one day I can help with the mop as well.  With heartfelt thanks,  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 02:35, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Just take what the opposers said to heart and work on their concerns. If you were able to clean up the articles that people had problems with (either provide references or have them deleted if no references can be found) that will go a long way at your next RfA if you choose to run again (and I think you should). Expanding those articles will also show that you have article space experience. One other concern I saw was about your relatively low contributions to Wikipedia space; while I disagree that you havent had enough, involvement in a project or volunteering at a noticeboard or the reference desk would help. Finally, with the concerns about your lack of experience and that gaffe with the PRODs, time spent productively editing should take care of that. --  At am a  頭 16:39, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank you
Hi Jsfouche. I just wanted to stop by and thank you for your support in my RfA. When I first saw your support rationale, I thought, "uh oh, he meant to support the other guy" and was afraid that would end awkwardly, but you handled it quite gracefully! As a side note, I hope to see you at RfA again in the future; Eagles247 (an editor I have a lot of respect for) has spoken very highly of you, and I have no doubt that you have the skills to address the concerns from the oppose column if you decide to make another go at it. HJ opposed my first RfA too, and ended up co-nomming my second, so I think people are willing to give a fresh assessment after a couple of months. Best, 28bytes (talk) 17:09, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

GOCE elections
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:54, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Marked as Patrolled
Hi there,. Just a little request. It seems that Twinkle, quite annoyingly, doesn't mark pages as patrolled even when you tag them for WP:CSD, WP:PROD or WP:AFD. I've just come across an article, that you'd tagged for WP:CSD on the unpatrolled list. I'm sure you already know, but if you scroll down to the bottom of the article, there will be a little link in square brackets that says  [ mark this page as patrolled ] . Clicking that means it'll get taken off the unpatrolled list and so no-one else will come across it on that list. It's not your fault, I know; it's Twinkle's. But until they fix it, it'd be great if you could click that link just before you tag an article. I've marked that one as patrolled. If you didn't find the article via the new pages list then just ignore me; you won't have had the option to mark it as patrolled. Sorry to be a pain. Keep up the good work. — Fly by Night  ( talk )  02:12, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * It seems to be sporadic. TW tells me it is marking it, and sometimes it appears to do so.  Have you reported this on the TW page?  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 02:15, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * It's been mentioned many times. See  also: Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Unpatrolled articles.

Southern Fried Chicken (franchise) A7
Hi, I have removed the speedy on this article. I'm a bit surprised that anyone might think that the Southern Fried Chicken brand might have no prospect of sources demonstrating significant impact being found, particularly as the article did mention the Channel 4 documentary that featured the franchise at the time when you nominated it. If in doubt, a PROD might be a friendlier alternative. Thanks Fæ (talk) 09:06, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the info. Actually, I was surprised that it did not meet CSD.  All it says is that it is a chicken restaurant in the UK.  The Channel 4 reference was about the CEO.  To me, even that does not make a claim of significance.  But I respect your interpretation.  Thanks again!  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 23:02, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Future Times Post
Hey,

Sorry, I saw that you declined the Future Times stub that I put together. How can I provide further verification of importance? Is it just a matter of citing more sources? A list of releases? I am sympathetic to the cause of keeping out non-relevant information, but we're a fairly popular dance music label. If Woodsist and Sacred Bones -- which are both fairly popular independent record labels -- can have short, to the point, wiki pages, why are we not allowed? I'm happy to add further citations and quotes, if that's what's necessary.

A — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rumorcontrols (talk • contribs) 03:50, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

hoy geatay kah???Pisti kang boanga ka !!!PANUWAY KAH!!!Nganu imu man epa delete akong oage.. ho u??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mbse15 (talk • contribs) 04:16, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Wiki-Hobbes
Please undo edit. I purposed for it to be Wiki-Hobbes  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Firefoxcub (talk • contribs) 00:30, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * That is against the naming convention. jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 00:55, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Wiki-Hobbes listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wiki-Hobbes. Since you had some involvement with the Wiki-Hobbes redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 00:30, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Don't you just love it!! I tagged it for RfD, silly TW!!  LOL.   jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 00:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

My contribution
Why do you wanbt to remove all my contributions. What do you know about the discussion about Islam in the Netherlands. This organisaton is very known. About the other pages. In want to work them out.Nlwriter (talk) 06:33, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Articles about organizations must claim why they are important, other than just an explanation about what they do. These claims must be supported by multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject.  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 06:45, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm busy making to put more information in the articles. Nlwriter (talk) 06:50, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Question about article
Hi Jsfouche, I was going through the list of requested articles on Wikipedia and saw Born Shoes as one of the red links. I just started the article to get it going, but can see that you've flagged it for deletion. Should it not have been on that requested list at all, or is there a way for a re-write so it is valid? Thanks for your help (I'm fairly new to Wikipedia). Stan mact (talk) 06:33, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Hello! The article, unfortunately, is written like an advertisement.  We do not allow articles that appear to advertise something, even if that is not the intent.  Also, every article must make a claim about why the subject is important, and these claims must be backed up by multiple reliable sources independent of the subject.  Take a look at WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:N.  These are some of the core pillars of Wikipedia.  Welcome, and happy editing!!  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 06:48, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tv Beds


The article Tv Beds has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable product.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joe Chill (talk) 16:39, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Gotta love page moves!! Ugh!  Please notify the original author.  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 16:43, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Ckeetch (talk) 17:23, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi, I saw your response to my Kim Carpenter article. I cannot proceed without further information. I have supplied copious external and wiki references (including 5 books) so I need to know more precisely why he is not seen as sufficiently significant. Thanks Beatnut88 (talk) 02:50, 7 August 2011 (UTC)beatnut88
 * The article does not explain why this person is notable. It is just a list of accomplishments.  We need an explanation of what this person has done to make them notable, backed-up with verifiable, reliable sources.  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 02:53, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

hello........
sir..i am a student at doon college of engineering and technology,dehradun in india....my college is under or u can say a part of doon group of colleges....i wANT my college group on wikipedia....and u proposed speedy deletion.....u r right that its from a website of college group of mine(my) but how can i solve this problem..because the college is not going to give me permission over their website...AND  i want my college in wikipedia............
 * The college already has an article at Doon College Of Engineering And Technology. Feel free to edit that article, as long as you do not copy any information from a copyrighted source. jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 05:20, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
— Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 05:19, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Kim Carpenter entry
Dear Jsfouche, Thanks for your response. Unfortunately you haven't given me any idea of what you are looking for. The entry as it stands does address why he is notable and is little different in content to that of his contemporary, Neil Armfield. Perhaps you could be more forthcoming so I can get an idea of what exactly is missing. This is my first wiki entry so I am somewhat flummoxed to have to ask the same question many times to be given the same brief answer no matter who is reviewing it. Beatnut88 (talk) 06:53, 7 August 2011 (UTC)beatnut88
 * I replied on the page, but in essence, the article, as it stands, is just a list of accomplishments. In order to be encyclopedic, we need to know why the subject is notable.  Explain it.  Add references about the person being in the news, etc.  A list of accomplishments is more like a résumé.  What has this person done to become notable? That's what we need in the article.   jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 06:59, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

AlexAndAlexa
I did a quick re-write of this, and removed the speedy: seems just about notable. If you still think it should be speedied (or AFD'd) I won't edit it any further. Gurt Posh (talk) 15:37, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Heath Jarvis
Upon review I think you are correct. Perhaps he should be added to 34th GMA Dove Awards? Vanadus (talk | contribs) 21:36, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * If there are sources to confirm that, then certainly. jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 21:38, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Vandalist
The IP vandalist with IP 71.234.240.76 vandalised again, see FIFA Beach Soccer World Cup qualification (CONCACAF) version 443746830. Since, I don't know how to block users, can you block this vanalist. Jab7842 (talk) 21:18, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I have left adequate warning and will watch their contributions. If further vandalism occurs, then we can proceed with a block request. If you notice any more, please let me know.  Thanks!!!  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 21:24, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Print_Gallery (M. C. Escher)
I disagree with your decision to decline. Articles such as The Bridge (M. C. Escher) have even less content, but have their own articles. If all of Escher's work were merged into the M. C. Escher article, then the article would be like the Albert Einstein or Adolf Hitler articles: too long. -- Σ  talk  contribs  03:59, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Antioch Article
Hi Friend,

I got your message about the Antioch Article. It is about the Antioch International Movement of Churches. I just don't know how to change the title! Addressing the notability issue currently, too. thanks a ton. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaljr (talk • contribs) 18:58, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Brandon article
That page looks to be a copy & paste from somewhere in Wikipedia, but for the life of me I can't find it. That and the article is a mess to reed as well. Wildthing61476 (talk) 02:58, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Left you a message on my talk - sorry, new here and it's not that simple - can't find any note on what was wrong with the Marcel Bleustein-Blanchet article...?

Hello Jsfouche I have recently joined the Wikipedia but I am new to all these. I wanted to make an entry for HispanTV, Iran's Spanish TV channel but I have faced some problems. The request has been rejected several times. And I do not know what else to do. Because the channel is in Spanish and Iranian prefer Persian I couldn't find a good-Reliable English reference. I need your help to continue. Thank you in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farzadparsayi (talk • contribs) 11:55, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello Jsfouche
Hello Jsfouche I have recently joined the Wikipedia but I am new to all these. I wanted to make an entry for HispanTV, Iran's Spanish TV channel but I have faced some problems. The request has been rejected several times. And I do not know what else to do. Because the channel is in Spanish and Iranian prefer Persian I couldn't find a good-Reliable English reference. I need your help to continue. Thank you in advance.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/HispanTV — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farzadparsayi (talk • contribs) 11:59, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Please help me to improve article Diffractive Beam Splitter
Hello, You rejected my article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Diffractive_Beam_Splitter in reason of "not reliable per the verifiability policy".

I do not understand, since I brought a recognized reference: 1.Diffractive Optics – Design, Fabrication and Test, O'Shea, Suleski, Kathman and Prather, 2004. 2.Additional link with another article with more simple description of the phenomena.

What more is necessary, specifically, in order to publish article? Additional WEB-links on the same material?

Your answer is valuable to me as I would like to publish more articles on related subjects.

Thanks Sasha — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newshurik (talk • contribs) 10:05, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Deprodding of Report (nursing)
I have removed the prod tag from, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the prod template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Articles for deletion. Thanks! I have deprodded the article because it is well-covered in a lot of nursing books, and therefore I believe it meets GNG. Tatterfly (talk) 13:00, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Associate Degree category
Just curious why you performed this edit when "Associate degree" is the correct category. Slip of the finger or some weird category renaming thing with which I am unfamiliar? ElKevbo (talk) 18:52, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree, but "Associate degrees" is not a valid category. It was red. I have opened a CfD to have the Associate's degrees category renamed Associate degrees. It should be done in 48 hours if no objections. jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 20:11, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok. I don't quite follow but I trust that you know what you're doing. :) ElKevbo (talk) 20:17, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

prodding
I am deprodding all articles nominated for deletion on the mere reason they have been unreferenced for X months if they look like topics for which references can be found. Unreferenced is not a reason for deletion; unreferenceable of course is. Nominating multiple articles for deletion on the basis of a rationale not valid under Deletion policy is probably not a good idea. I really respect your work on this nursing, long neglected at Wikipedia. I can understand your impatience at the articles that would need extensive rewriting, especially since you are almost the only person willing to work substantially on these topics. But the solution is to recruit more editors. The interim solution, which I adopt when faced with this sort of situation, is to try to make at least a minimal fix, often by deleting what seems like inappropriate material. I'm doing this to most of the articles I deprod, as I don't think it best practice with such articles to leave all the work to others, I try to fix what I can of at least some of the articles I think need to be fixed and kept--I try not to just say keep or deprod & then ignore them. I cannot fix everything, any more than you can, but this is a cooperative project.

I don't want to oppose you at deletion discussions, considering the good work you are doing. Perhaps you can see it a little my way.  DGG ( talk ) 21:53, 17 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your comments. I really appreciate it, as you are one of the most respected editors here.  Your words hold a lot of weight with me.  Perhaps I was in a bad mood that night.  I was trying to clean up some articles, and there were several that had been unreferenced for a long time.  I hated having so many nursing articles that were so poorly written, that I was embarrassed.  There has not been much activity on the nursing articles.  Although probably not the best way, the PRODs were an attempt to recruit some help.  It is my experience that deletion processes often get other editors to help with sourcing and editing.  For several of the articles, this has been the case, as they have been improved and sourced.  I have been focusing on the larger articles that are tagged with higher importance, and I grew frustrated at the number of short, less important articles that were not sourced.  After exploring WP space pages more, I believe there are better ways now (like RfC).  Again, thank you for the kudos and advice.  I take that to heart.  Cheers!!!  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 01:37, 18 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, you did succeed--you did get some help: my own at least. I don't know how much time i'll have to work on them, but I'll give it some more effort. In practice, I have to admit that listing an article for deletion does often work towards getting it fixed. It's not the official way, but I've   done it myself, frequently, According to IAR,  whatever improves the encyclopedia is the right way to do it. And there's a negative feeling of hopeless that sets in for all of us  when reviewing many bad articles. When I find I'm deleting everything I see at CSD, I know its time to stop for the night.  (And that's why I work on multiple fields--at least one will usually be making some progress.)   DGG ( talk ) 05:23, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 16:37, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Nursing GA review
Hi Jsfouche, I'm had a look at the nomination for Nursing, and I'm afraid I've failed it. I appreciate you've put a lot of work into it recently but it's not quite at the standard for a full review yet. I've added some comments at Talk:Nursing/GA1. As well as adding more references and sorting out maintenance tags, I'd recommend taking this to peer review before a further nomination, because it's such a big topic. Let me know if you have any questions. -- Beloved Freak  10:53, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Jackson Guthy / Deleted Page Assistance
Hi there

My name's Kay Anderson, I work for a music management company called Velvet Hammer Music and Management Group. Our clients include System of a Down, Deftones and Alice In Chains,

I attempted to set up a new page for a new client called "Jackson Guthy" today. The page was immediately removed for containing promotional material. If you could please help advise what I can do to get a new page set up for Jackson, that would be hugely appreciated? I'm unsure what I did wrong here!

Thank you, -Kay — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kayfrimanders (talk • contribs) 03:25, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * We have very strong policies against any type of promotion. Since you have indicated that you affiliated with the subject, you are HIGHLY encouraged NOT to edit/create articles for which you have such a conflict of interest.  I left more information on your talk page.  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 03:36, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Niagara Whirlpool
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Alex Day for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alex Day is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alex Day (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Lagrange613 (talk) 21:22, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 01:24, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

computer software is not usually web content
I know it can be a matter of judgment, but I changed the speedy on MisterMind to a Prod.  DGG ( talk ) 02:18, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

catogories
1. Why was category Greek Orthodox bishops of Pittsburgh removed? I followed the guidelines I found in category Greek Orthodox bishops of Boston.

Ref: Metropolitan Savas (Zembillas) of Pittsburgh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephenparsons (talk • contribs) 00:05, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * That category does not exist. Re-linked categories do not exist, so it was deleted from the article page.  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 00:07, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

2. I don't get it. Can't new categories be created? There are directions for creating categories that I tried to follow. What is a "relinked category"?

Multicultural citizenship
I believe you asked for the removal of my article regarding multicultural citizenship, which is quite different than the "multiple citizenship" page. Additionally, you may want to actually read the article before noting it for deletion, "multicultural citizenship" is a more specific form of citizenship and therefore deserves its own page. On Will Kymlicka's page, there is a stub for a "multicultural citizenship" page. enjoy the holiday! — Preceding unsigned comment added by S.beifel (talk • contribs) 01:55, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * It could be a section on the multiple citizenship page because there was much overlap. I always read articles before I tag them for deletion.  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 03:58, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

They're not really related. Multicultural citizenship is when there is a person who is a citizen of one country, but retains the culture or language from another. Multiple citizenship is having more than one form of citizenship. There is minimal overlap that I can see. Additionally, as I mentioned before, there wouldn't be a pre-established stub for an article on Kymlicka's page if it weren't its own separate topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by S.beifel (talk • contribs) 07:08, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

template
can you foward me a "native speaker of english" wikipedia babel template? Abc123456person (talk) 22:19, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

A Collection of Vibrations for Your Skull
I left a message in reply to yours on my page. Please consider creating this article now that I have clarified such.

--Lucapremier88 (talk) 11:36, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Your AFC review
Hi, your review at that page is totally bad! Please reread the instructions: if you don't find any reason like unsourced statements or notability, then either fix the draft or tag it and accept it!

oh and your reviews here and here are also bad. In the first draft the user tried it and added marks where the refs belong to. If it is no coypright violation/copy 'n paste of any other wikipedia article, then move it! The latter one is just ... mabdul 23:31, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * As for the first example, that article was a huge mess. Where do you even start to reformat it or clean it up?  Helping editors is one thing; trying to completely reformat a huge messy long article like that is another.  It was almost unreadable.  The other two are BLPs.  I may have stretched the BLP requirement for inline citations, as not all the content was contentious.   jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 00:03, 1 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Check the refs (external links) if there is something reliable and 3rd party. if that is so, then don't decline it. Just leave it for somebody other and/or fix a minimum of the formatting and move it. mabdul 20:50, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

PLEASE
Please tell me why my article wasn't accepted. I have reliable, third-party references! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Louloukitty (talk • contribs) 13:17, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, YouTube is not a reliable source, and the company's website is a first-party reference. So neither qualify.  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 20:32, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Hoving
You asked for a citation and I left one and then you go back and find yet another reason to remove me. I have not even had time to document and cite the other notable sources because you and someone else, who claimed nastily I was some or guy, delete the information before I have time to even make the citations.

There are numerous definitive sources I can refer to but it seems as though you are on a witch hunt here. I have legitimate citations and my information and accomplishments are relevant when I e takes the time to educate yourself rather than indiscriminately delete my life. And to think I just made a donation to the organization, now I wished I had not.

In the future you might consider not asking for information to substantiate and then. One up with yet another reason to continue your witch hunt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.255.112.209 (talk) 00:56, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

You asked for a citation and I left one and then you go back and find yet another reason to remove me. I have not even had time to document and cite the other notable sources because you and someone else, who claimed nastily I was some or guy, delete the information before I have time to even make the citations.

There are numerous definitive sources I can refer to but it seems as though you are on a witch hunt here. I have legitimate citations and my information and accomplishments are relevant when I e takes the time to educate yourself rather than indiscriminately delete my life. And to think I just made a donation to the organization, now I wished I had not.

In the future you might consider not asking for information to substantiate and then. One up with yet another reason to continue your witch hunt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoving (talk • contribs) 00:58, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
 * We have guidelines here at Wikipedia, and I regret that you feel attacked. Calling it a witch hunt is not only insensitive, but it shows a lack of good faith on your part.  If you READ the information posted, you will learn a lot about our guidelines and policies.  Getting angry and posting comments such as these are not going to serve you well here on the project.  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 01:06, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Then why ask for citations and then find another reason to remove my information. Serve me well here on wiapedia? I've been around here for quite a whole and never had any trouble before. I complied with what you requested yet you found yet another reason to totally delete my information rather than make attemps to suggest an edit or revision. Let's see, how would you feel, brother? Anyone ever deleted your life's accomplishments from this venue? Doubt it!

It's just easier to sit back and do your dirty work and not provide adequate information or explanation. You say I'm being insensitive and show a lack of good faith, I would say after going back on what you requested was a sign, a true sign of a lack of faith and insensitivity. HovingHoving (talk) 01:22, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I think you've said quite enough. Thanks.   jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 01:25, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Your accusing me of a personal attack? Wow you are really something else, my issue was not with you personally, i never attacked or threatened you, quite the opposite, I had an issue with what several of the "editors" here were stating. Calling me a hoax for incistance. so just so i am clear one can't even have a dialog with someone and make any attempt at explaining yourself, if that's the case, that's fine,,it appears that's the way things seem to operate around here. Thanks for your insight, guidance and help in resolving this issue. HovingHoving (talk) 01:38, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Rejection of my Waretown, NJ Article
Hi Jsfouche: Thank you for looking at my new Waretown, NJ article which I submitted for review and which was rejected because one already exists. Please note, however, that my new article has nothing to do with the Waretown in Ocean County, NJ. My Waretown was located in Gloucester County, NJ and ceased to exist around 1874. The Waretown you linked me to is still there in Ocean county and is still thriving. I did mention that in the first paragraph but perhaps it was not clear enough. In any case I was hoping you could take another look and I'm sure you'll see it is a totally different Waretown article. I am open to whatever recommendations you might make. I apologize if I am doing things screwy but I'm totally new to all this (my first time experience) and it has been very daunting trying to do everything correctly. Thanks! Rich Ware (Tresprin48). Tresprin48 (talk) 22:37, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi Jsfouche: I'm not sure if you left me a msg or not so I'm going to send this. I apologize if I am not figuring this out better than I am. Navigating all this is new and confusing for me. If you left me a msg could you give me a link to where I can find it? Here's what I wrote earlier:--- Thank you for looking at my new Waretown, NJ article which I submitted for review and which was rejected because one already exists. Please note, however, that my new article has nothing to do with the Waretown in Ocean County, NJ. My Waretown was located in Gloucester County, NJ and ceased to exist around 1874. The Waretown you linked me to is still there in Ocean county and is still thriving. I did mention that in the first paragraph but perhaps it was not clear enough. In any case I was hoping you could take another look and I'm sure you'll see it is a totally different Waretown article. I am open to whatever recommendations you might make. I apologize if I am doing things screwy but I'm totally new to all this (my first time experience) and it has been very daunting trying to do everything correctly. Thanks! Rich Ware Tresprin48 (talk) 23:18, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for contacting me. I have fixed this and moved the article to the mainspace.  I originally tried to accept the article, but the system flagged me stating that the article already existed.  I had to add a disambiguation to the title.  Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!!!  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 23:30, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much! This is exciting! My first one. I may have some more in my brain that my end up here. Again, much appreciated and thanks for having patience with me. Rich Ware Tresprin48 (talk) 01:24, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Hunted page
Hey.

Just wondering why the page for Hunted hasn't been accepted? I realise the reason for not accepting it is due to notoriety but this doesn't make sense as they are signed to the label Massacre Records, and there are many bands on this label's roster on wikipedia that have similar content to that proposed in my article... Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HuntedUK (talk • contribs) 16:35, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The reason I declined was not notability, but for references. The references are not reliable.  The band's own website and its label's website are not third-party sources.  The other source is an online encyclopedia that anyone can edit, which also fails the reliability test.  The article needs reliable, third-party sources to pass the requirement.  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 23:40, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Re: first Party
Are there any other first-party references in my Article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Louloukitty (talk • contribs) 02:04, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

GOCE newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 10:51, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

GOCE 2011 Year-End Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Tagging
I would've thought the right thing to do to Ubekibekibekibekistanstan was to tag it for CSD R3, instead of listing it for RfD. --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 05:34, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I considered it, but I do know where the title comes from. It was a gaffe by Cain.  I had tagged it as CSD before, then it was recreated as a redirect, so I felt RfD might be a better place to get consensus.  I totally agree that it was useless as redirect.  Thanks!!  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 06:38, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi there, I need help!!! Please help me!!!
You edited an article I wrote. Im very new to this so I don't understand exactly how to do this. Can you please help me? I'm in need of some real help. Please? I hope to talk to you soon. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scr099 (talk • contribs) 06:35, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Check out the links on your Talk Page. They have excellent information on policies, guidelines, and suggestions for writing articles.  After you read these, if you have specific questions, please ask!  Happy editing!!!  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 06:40, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Bounce House - New Article Revision
Hello,

Thank you for your feedback on my new article contribution "Bounce House". However, I disagree that this information should be listed under "Inflatable Castle". Inflatable castle is a specific bounce house, in a broad area. There are many more bounce houses beyond just inflatable castles. Also, bounce house is a very well- searched term and should really have its own listing.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your feedback.

Regards,

Stephanie Baldwin stephanie@creativeeconcepts.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cec2008 (talk • contribs) 14:05, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The name has been discussed on Talk:Inflatable castle. It appears the name is very regional, but we cannot create duplicate articles for different names for the same thing.  I would suggest that go to that talk page and start a discussion about it there.  Happy editing!   jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 15:03, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Article on Mufti Ismail Moosa Menk
Hi

You edited my article on Mufti Ismail Moosa Menk, you state i need to add more information on why he should be included on the wiki , however i have added whatever i could find , please advise me with a example on what you mean my more information , as i have read through all the articles and i still don't understand what it is that your looking for. the information you see is all there is about him, he is a Islamic scholar that is well known around the world and some sources are not online nor in the library as he has not done any books as stated by him , he does it for the good and not for profit. the only information on him are on you tube where his channel has many lectures by him touring the world. he is a example and beacon of what is Islam and the reason why i would like to have him on here is because he represent what is real Islam ,not the terrorist induced propaganda that has been put out there. Please review this carefully and i urge you to have a look at his YouTube channel : MufitMenroxs and you will see a man that is propagating a true and peaceful Islam and also removing fears and misconception about it.

Thank You You may message me back on this IP or ssaiyed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.132.14.54 (talk) 18:04, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Got Blue Balls (band)
Hello, I´d like to know what´s wrong with the sources a I used in article about Got Blue Balls (band). Thank you! :) Idaina — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.248.4.212 (talk) 10:30, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Got Blue Balls (band)
Hello, I´d like to know what was the trouble with sources for the article Got Blue Balls (band). Thank You! Idaina — Preceding unsigned comment added by Idaina (talk • contribs) 11:55, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

PoolWerx Page Deletion Query
Hi Jsfouche,

I am just enquiring as to why the page 'PoolWerx' was put up for Speedy Deletion and removed? The page had previously been deleted and after some alterations was re-posted. The admin Cind.amuse posted the following comment referring to the PoolWerx page:

''Just wanted to congratulate you on the work you did with the PoolWerx and John O'Brien (PoolWerx) articles. While they started out a bit rough, you've shown yourself to be a quick study. I appreciate your contributions and hope you decide to stick around! Again, well done! Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 09:15, 2 December 2011 (UTC)''

There have only been very minor adjustments made to the article since the approval from an admin and do not understand how it could possible have been put up for speedy deletion again? If you could please inform me why it was deleted that would be great.

Regards, Shannon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shannonob90 (talk • contribs) 00:23, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Help needed
Can you help me to copy-edit Jayne Mansfield? The article has good information, but the copy is horrible. Aditya (talk • contribs) 12:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

PoolWerx Page Deletion Query
Hi Jsfouche,

I am just enquiring as to why the page 'PoolWerx' was put up for Speedy Deletion and removed? The page had previously been deleted and after some alterations was re-posted. The admin Cind.amuse posted the following comment referring to the PoolWerx page after the alterations had been made:

''Just wanted to congratulate you on the work you did with the PoolWerx and John O'Brien (PoolWerx) articles. While they started out a bit rough, you've shown yourself to be a quick study. I appreciate your contributions and hope you decide to stick around! Again, well done! Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 09:15, 2 December 2011 (UTC)''

There have only been very minor adjustments made to the article since the approval from an admin and do not understand how it could possible have been put up for speedy deletion again? If you could please inform me why it was deleted that would be great.

Kind Regards, Shannon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shannonob90 (talk • contribs) 22:37, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Healy-Rae family
Category:Healy-Rae family, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:21, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Thought you'd want to know
I thought you'd want to know that I edited your user page to link to an identical edit counter to the one you had linked, as it (the soxred93 one) has expired (Tparis has taken over the tools). Hope you don't mind. :-) -- Gilderien Talk|Contribs 20:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

ogradyplant.com
Hi Jsfouche,

would you kindly tell me the reasons for deletion of ograydplant.com

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kanoute696 (talk • contribs) 07:48, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Relationship Evaluation
Hey, just wondering about the deletion of my article on the Relationship Evaluation article.

I made the edits that were asked of me last time and submitted a different article and was wondering what I need to do/what I need to change to get an article accepted about the Relate Evaluation.

Please let me know! Thanks!!

Carly Ostler — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlyostler (talk • contribs) 20:26, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

If you're interested...
Hello, Jsfouche. My nickname here is Lecen and I usually contribute on articles related to Brazilian 19th century. There are a few editors, including myself, which are trying to bring back from the dead the Wikiproject Brazil. Usually editors interested on Brazil find themselves utterly isolated when contributing here, with no one to rely on. There is no help to review an article we wrote, to share thoughts about an article, to resolve a content dispute, abolutely nothing. We want to change that once and for all. We want to create a place where an editor can feel at home, where he knows there will be others who will do their best to help him anyway they can. If you're itnerested, the first step is to place your name on the list of participants of the Empire of Brazil task force and add it to your watchlist. The task force will be the place where everyoen can talk to each other and where we'll start reviving Wikiproject Brazil. Please, think about it. Regards, --Lecen (talk) 01:42, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I would love to participate!! Thanks for the invite. I will add my name now.  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 23:56, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Those are great news! I hope you'll join us, Jsfouche. We are in need of sticking together, we can't afford to work here by ourselves only. Cheers, --Lecen (talk) 03:01, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Former countries introduction
Welcome,, to the Former countries WikiProject! You have just become part of an editorial group that focuses on improving Wikipedia's coverage of former country articles. Now that you've joined, the first thing you should do for our cause is add the User WPFC template to your userpage. Once you have, we will recognize your support with a before your name on the members list! I welcome and thank you again,, for joining this project, Sincerely, Xuxalliope (talk) 18:20, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Being an official member of our team now, you really should introduce yourself on the members'  [ talk page].
 * If you have any questions in the meantime, pose them on the WikiProject's [ talk page] . A more experienced WPFC member, perhaps even myself, will respond to any as quickly as possible.
 * Do you consider yourself a very experienced writer of Wiki markup? Let the whole project know by giving yourself a rating from between ButtonYellow1.png and ButtonYellow5.png on the members' list! (5 means more experienced than Jimmy Wales)
 * Still daunted by the layout? Familiarize yourself with the WikiProject by surfing through our Navigation box. You will notice some pretty neat statistics that might actually help you start off with editing.
 * If you're still not ready for anything big, the To do list has some articles that practically need no preparation to begin on. The Infobox maintenance section  especially. It's articles like these that are dying for your skills!
 * Is this advice all but too juvenile for you? I understand. It's hard being that talented. Just remember to tag the talk pages of those new articles you've been creating with our project's template WPFC.
 * Not to bore you again with our talk page, but it is actually where most of our important discussions take place. You may find it useful to [ watchlist it].
 * Be sure to take care and read any explanations we've posted around the WikiProject about its features. But, most of all, try to get to bed on time. However... if sleep is some thing of the past for you, then, by all means, join one of our subprojects, too!

inre Articles for deletion/Agents of Secret Stuff (2010)
I have no idea what kind of shape the two previous versions were that had those two versions deleted, but the current version... though it started off as pretty crappy, has gone through some improvements. What was nominated as a 93-word unsourced stub, is now somwhat better than when I found it. You are invited to revisit the article, and the above deletion discussion. Best,  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:31, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

AFC Backlog
Thanks for selecting the nursing logo. I am proposing a better version of the same logo and offering to find or make & dedicate it to the public domain. See my comments Tradimus (talk) 03:26, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Articles for Creation urgently needs your help!
Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation. If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page. Happy reviewing!  TheSpecialUser TSU
 * Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 09:01, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject:Articles for Creation October - November 2012 Backlog Elimination Drive
 WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive! The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 22, 2012 – November 21, 2012.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive. There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

EdwardsBot (talk) 00:11, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Articles for creation needs YOUR help!
Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation at 22:30, 29 November 2012 (UTC). If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.

Lavaedeay Monlique Lee
Thank you for moving the above article to mainspace. If you have time, please also review http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Tevin_Washington and if this other article looks OK to you please move to mainspace also. Thanks again for your assistance and consideration. Mistercontributer (talk) 01:31, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I went ahead and moved the Tevin Washington article onto the mainspace as a logged in user, since this article is related to the Vad Lee article. Thanks again for your assistance. Mistercontributer (talk) 21:13, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter
Delivered 01:02, 18 December 2012 (UTC) by EdwardsBot. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter, please remove your name from the spamlist.

Wikiproject Articles for creation Needs You!
 WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive! The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1st, 2013 – March 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive. There is a backlog of over 2000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

Delivered by User:EdwardsBot on behalf of Wikiproject Articles for Creation at 13:58, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject AFC needs your help... again
 WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive! The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from July 1st, 2013 – July 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive. There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code cleanup, and more page cleanups. If you want to see a full list of changes, go to WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script/Development page. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks.

Delivered at 13:03, 19 June 2013 (UTC) by EdwardsBot (talk), on behalf of WikiProject AFC

Talk Sporting Club Accra
Talk:Sporting Club Accra, Sporting Club Accra is a football club in Ghana. its renowned for its feeder system of producing players to renowned soccer/football academies and premier league clubs here in Ghana. Its licensed and registered at the Ghana Football Association and the Registers General department as a Ltd. All information given are genuine. I don't see why the page must be deleted. I hope the decision to delete it will be reviewed. Am open for further questioning. Thanks Check Mohammed Abu

Enock Kwakwa

Thomas Agyiri

Ghana Football Association

for verification

[1] [2] [3] [4] (Watwany (talk) 02:17, 23 July 2013 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Watwany (talk • contribs)

Talk Sporting Club Accra
Talk:Sporting Club Accra, Sporting Club Accra is a football club in Ghana. its renowned for its feeder system of producing players to renowned soccer/football academies and premier league clubs here in Ghana. Its licensed and registered at the Ghana Football Association and the Registers General department as a Ltd. All information given are genuine. I don't see why the page must be deleted. I hope the decision to delete it will be reviewed. Am open for further questioning. Thanks Check Mohammed Abu

Enock Kwakwa

Thomas Agyiri

Ghana Football Association

for verification

[1] [2] [3] [4] (Watwany (talk) 02:17, 23 July 2013 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Watwany (talk • contribs)

October 2013 AFC Backlog elimination drive
 WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!

The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 1st, 2013 – October 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. -- Mdann 52   talk to me! This newsletter was delivered on behalf of WPAFC by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:31, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive
 Hello, Jsfouche:

WikiProject AFC is holding a two month long Backlog Elimination Drive!

The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from December 1st, 2013 – January 31st, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script has been released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. EdwardsBot (talk) 09:15, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) at 09:15, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

K7 Computing
Hi. I left you a message on your post on my talk. janchi27

phazall
Manahan will be playing with Lamb of God and The Acacia Strain in January. They aren't just some small-town band. They even have a music video for Narcotic] here. There are plenty of references already up and there are more to come, so I don't think deleting this page just yet is fair.

ogradyplant.com
Hi Jsfouche,

would you kindly tell me the reasons for deletion of ograydplant.com

Thank you

Relationship Evaluation
Hey, just wondering about the deletion of my article on the Relationship Evaluation article.

I made the edits that were asked of me last time and submitted a different article and was wondering what I need to do/what I need to change to get an article accepted about the Relate Evaluation.

Please let me know! Thanks!!

Carly Ostler

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Credit Card Surcharge Law
I think an article could be made about these laws, but this is barely a stub. Can we give the creator a few more days? I am prodding this instead. Bearian (talk) 23:20, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
 * That was odd. I was on the AfC site tagging old one for G13.  Not sure how this happened.  Did you move the article to main space after I tagged for G13?  I am OK with it, just trying to figure out what happened.  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 23:34, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
 * No, you are right, it was an AfC, and tagged for speedy deletion. I removed some tags, moved it to main space, and placed it in the "proposed deletion" cycle. That gives Wikiproject Law and whomever else a week to fix it. Bearian (talk) 23:40, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
 * OK. Thanks.  Just wanted to make sure I didn't screw up and tag G13 on a mainspace article!  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 23:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

vibroacoustic stimulation
content was wrong - vibroacoustic stimulation is vibroacoustic therapy... content existed was talking about fetal vibroacoustic stimulation... I corrected it now... vibroacoustic stimulation posted was correct - do not delete it... Cyrinus (talk) 03:09, 8 December 2013 (UTC)


 * You could not correct the mistake in your definition, but you made a sneaky attempt - which is vandalism of the VAT article and harassment. There is no meta or sock puppetry. It is contribution from all vibroacoustic therapists. Global effort. Anyway - I will fix your VAS article. Cyrinus (talk) 18:17, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * It's not my article. Which is a point you obviously keep missing.  No one owns articles here.  Let me just say one last thing to you, your shitty attitude will only serve to alienate you here on Wikipedia.  You have ignored so many other editor's attempts of good faith to educate you and provide assistance.  Those attempts are constantly met with cynicism, contempt, arrogance, and just plain old bad manners.  You really should have listened to the advice given by others so that you could become a valuable editor here on the project.  Instead, you get pissed off and have chosen to repeatedly harass and vilify everyone who has tried to help you.  You see every attempt to provide feedback as an attack instead of an offer of help and the application of community standards and guidelines.  This is a community of editors, and those who decide they will ignore etiquette and rules because they do not fit their agenda will not survive.  I can only hope that at some point you come to your senses and realize that this is an encyclopedia and not a method of getting the word out about a particular topic.  You made it clear that you and other therapists will not be ignored, so that makes it blatantly obvious that your goal is not to contribute to knowledge, but to promote a specific topic at all expenses.  I wish you luck in your professional endeavors, and may you one day become a valuable editor here.  Take care,  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 20:13, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I am aware of that - you edited that article as a perinatal nurse - I am very familiar with perinatal field for more than 10 years - your edit was wrong. Stop bullying new users. You even got a note from Bureaucrat. Stop your Sherlock Holmes, paranoia and sneaky activities on new users. Most of the comments were not helpful for new user or contribution to correct the article. I read the guidelines. Most of the comments were not productive or guiding a new user - On top of that name calling - no wonder. Even in this post - "cynicism, contempt, arrogance, and just plain old bad manners" - name calling. I am simply answering and posting my references. I will edit the article and improve it. If you can contribute and help - fine. Stop your harassment or bullying tactics... Read your user page (exact opposite)... I do not need your blessing for my professional endeavors and I do not believe in luck - been there - done that (including your perinatal at much higher level) - retired. My goal is to contribute... not promotion or canvassing... I do not need wiki for my promotion... We have so many other ways on the Internet and social networks... lol Cyrinus (talk) 04:24, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * There you go again. Such arrogance.  That is like the 5th or 6th time you have said that you and only you are an expert.  You told Uncle Mitty that "Anyone can be an audio engineer. There are experts and wannabes." when he mentioned his expertise as an audio engineer.  Then your above comment to me "been there - done that (including your perinatal at much higher level)".  And then somehow you are a perinatal expert as well and told me I was wrong.  And your repeated calling of Wiki Admins and editors as "idiots."  It is a pattern of clear Megalomania.  You repeatedly tell us all that we are not VAT experts so we should just shut up and move on and keep to what we know.  Wikipedia does not work like that.  If you cannot accept that, then I suggest it is you that needs to take your pompous, arrogant, over-inflated sense of self-importance and move on.  This is not a stage for experts to showcase their research and promote their craft. It is an encyclopedia.  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 17:59, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Simply - Same to You! Happy Holidays!!! Cyrinus (talk) 05:16, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh dear! Thanks for your patience jsfouche! In my experience, few things bring more attention to fringe articles more quickly than a single-issue POV editor with a persecution complex. --Salimfadhley (talk) 13:53, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh dear! uncle jeff is a good man. I irritated him by changing VAS article which was closer to his heart (VAS and VAT closer to my heart too). uncle will bring more babies to the world in 2014 (and new babies to wiki too)... yes we need to fix that VAS definition - FVAS sounds like giving stimulation to pregnant woman - it should be a stimulation to fetus. I will correct it with latest research - which is good for wiki. i removed the offending thread on google plus. thanks for all the help... uncle have a happy holidays! Cyrinus (talk) 01:08, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello!
Hi Jsfouche! I've been trawling my watchlist. You might see that I made this change to your article: "Navbox name = Medical research studies". This name isn't displayed anywhere, and is used when you click the small 'e' button on the template, so changing the name will change what page you're editing when you click 'edit'. Other than that, I hope that you're well and enjoying the festive season! Kind regards, --LT910001 (talk) 04:40, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Category:Advanced practice nursing journals
Category:Advanced practice nursing journals, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 19:19, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Nurse Corps (United States Army)
Please see Talk:Nurse Corps (United States Army). Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 03:54, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Byrdine F. Lewis School of Nursing and Health Professions (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Endowment


 * Hildegard Peplau (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to University of Leuven

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

GOCE 2013 Annual Report
Please delete this page. I will recreate a page soon which strictly adheres to the wikipedia guidelines. My apologies for the mixup. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Owenphelan (talk • contribs) 21:44, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Clinical nurse leader, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Department of Veteran Affairs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Northeast region, Brazil reverted edit
You reverted an edit of mine in that article, an article you have not previously edited in recent history. You gave no reason, and my edit was still in process. I saved part of an edit, because it was a long edit, and I wanted to make sure my draft work got saved in case of computer malfunction. The purpose of the edit was to break an unordere4d long list of dozens of items into categories like Arts & Letters etc. It was a reasonable and good faith edit. What is your explanation? If you disagree with the nature of the edit change, please discuss your objections on the articles talk page. If you reverted the edit for some other reason, what is the explanation?Sbalfour (talk) 16:31, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I have reverted my edit. It was not possible to tell that it was "in progress".  To prevent this type of mistake, I'd suggest using your sandbox to do the edits, and when you have it how you want, copy and paste it into the article.  This way, other editors do not see incomplete work and think it was an error.  No harm was meant, but what was left on the page removed some content without explanation.  That was the reason for the revert.   jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 16:50, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I did modify some of the bullet items, which is a list, to shorten the description following the name to no more than 2 lines. This article is not about biography - if someone wants to know about the listed person, they can follow the wikilink to the named biographical article.  If there is no such article in the wiki, they can help wikipedia by creating it, and transfer the biographical info to that article.  I did not lose any whole bullet items, i.e. names.
 * This list is an unordered list, whose inclusion criteria is undefined. It has become a list of trivia, and it should be structured in some way, as well as shortened, according to some recognizable criteria.  For now, I'm leaving all names in it, until I can define those criteria. I'm going to be revamping the whole article, as I have time.  If you have any suggestions, please include them on the talk page under the appropriate section(s), where I have extensive commentary.  Regards, Sbalfour (talk) 19:48, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * This list is an unordered list, whose inclusion criteria is undefined. It has become a list of trivia, and it should be structured in some way, as well as shortened, according to some recognizable criteria.  For now, I'm leaving all names in it, until I can define those criteria. I'm going to be revamping the whole article, as I have time.  If you have any suggestions, please include them on the talk page under the appropriate section(s), where I have extensive commentary.  Regards, Sbalfour (talk) 19:48, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frontier Nursing University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mary Breckinridge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Controversy regarding health psychology and occupational health psychology
I observed that you have made many thoughtful edits in related fields. I wondered if you could weigh on some controversies that bear on both health psychology and occupational health psychology. Thank you. Iss246 (talk) 19:09, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello can you give me some advice?
I edited a page yesterday and you removed it along with another entry on the page. It appears from the note that the problem was the external links. Is that the case? If I put the entry back without the external link would that be acceptable? I am fairly new at editing and there is a lot to learn. I did read the link document before I included the link. Apparently I didn't understand it completely. Would it be OK to put both the entries back if they didn't contain the links? Would that violate any wikipedia etiquette? Also am I using the talk page correctly? Thanks for your help Slamslam102 (talk) 17:08, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

I havent heard form you so I am using your comments from when you removed the content and assume the links were the problem. I am going to put the material back in without the links. If there's something other than the links that is the issue, please let me know. Slamslam102 (talk) 19:35, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Halla_Diyab#Syrian_refugees_controversy
hi, Im contacting you regarding the entry u originally reviewed at I have added some information to the Syrian_refugees_controversy section. the information was sourced and references were given. however it appears that the subject of the entry "i.e., Dr Diyab managed to delete that contribution, making use of the fact that there were indeed some vandalism acts on the page following the controversy. however i see that deleting the addition i made is well and truly unjustified. Xlantraymon (talk) 02:04, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Feedback needed on using special characters
Hello. Thank you for using VisualEditor! Having editors use it is the best way for the Wikimedia Foundation to develop it into the best tool it can be.

While we always welcome general feedback (please report any issues in Bugzilla in the "VisualEditor" product or drop your feedback on the central feedback page on MediaWiki.org), the developers are especially interested right now in feedback on the special character inserter. This new tool is used for inserting special characters (including symbols like ₥, IPA pronunciation symbols, mathematics symbols, and characters with diacritics). It is intended to help people whose computers do not have good character inserters. For example, many Mac users prefer to use the extensive "Special Characters..." tool present at the bottom of the Edit menu in all applications or to learn the keyboard shortcuts for characters like ñ and ü.

The current version of the special characters tool in VisualEditor is very simple and very basic. It will be getting a lot of work in the coming weeks and months. It does not contain very many character sets at this time. (The specific character sets can be customized at each Wikipedia, so that each project could have a local version with the characters it wants.) But the developers want your ideas at this early stage about ways that the overall concept could be improved. I would appreciate your input on this question, so please try out the character inserter and tell me what changes to the design would (or would not!) best work for you.

Issues you might consider:
 * How often do you normally use Wikipedia's character inserters?
 * Which character sets are useful to you? Should it include all 18 of the character sets provided in the wikitext editor's newer toolbar at the English Wikipedia, the 10 present in the older editor toolbar, or some other combination of character sets?
 * How many special characters would you like to see at one time?
 * Should there be a "priority" or "favorites" section for the 10 or 12 characters that most editors need most often? Is it okay if you need an extra click to go beyond the limited priority set?
 * How should the sections be split up? Should they be nested? Ordered?
 * How should the sections be navigated? Should there be a drop-down? A nested menu?
 * The wikitext editor has never included many symbols and characters, like ℗ and ♀. Do you find that you need these missing characters?  If the character inserter in VisualEditor includes hundreds or thousands of special characters, will it be overwhelming? How will you find the character you want? What should be done for users without enough space to display more than a few dozen characters?
 * Should the character inserter be statically available until dismissed? Should it hover near the mouse? Should it go away on every selection or 10 seconds after a selection with no subsequent ones?
 * Some people believe that the toolbar already has too many options—how would you simplify it?

The developers are open to any thoughts on how the special character inserter can best be developed, even if this requires significant changes. Please leave your views on the central feedback page, or, if you'd prefer, you can contact me directly on my talk page. It would be really helpful if you can tell me how frequently you need to use special characters in your typical editing and what languages or other special characters are important to you.

Thank you again for your work with VisualEditor and for any feedback you can provide. I really do appreciate it.

P.S. You might be interested in the current ideas about improving citations, too. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 00:20, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on changes to the AfC mailing list
Hello Jsfouche! There is a discussion that your input is requested on! I look forward to your comments, thoughts, opinions, criticisms, and questions!

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.
 * This message was composed and sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 18:18, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

GRU page template
Thanks for the offer of help on the GRU talk page! I certainly don't want to undertake such a thing alone, especially considering I try to loop in as many involved editors as possible in my work to keep things safe. I can go ahead and create the History of GHSU page now, and then my sandbox will have the first college page template and the beginning of the second page, if you'd like to stop by and offer feedback. I also haven't the slightest clue how to create a template like the one on the Georgia Tech page, so anything you'd like to offer would be greatly appreciated! Thanks! GRUcrule (talk) 14:22, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Feedback?
Hey, just wanted to drop you a line and see if you'd be able to swing by my sandbox and provide a bit of feedback before I go ahead and create three different GRU-related articles...all three starting points are here. Thank ya kindly! GRUcrule (talk) 20:23, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Category:Gastrointestinal nursing journals
Category:Gastrointestinal nursing journals, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Jinkinson  talk to me  20:41, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

American Journal of Nursing
Hey Jeff - Just a quick thank you for taking the time to create the AJN article a few weeks ago. I meant to create it at some point last year, but I'm not too familiar with entries for journals and it just fell off of my radar. That one is an important entry for the project and I was tickled to see it "turn blue" recently. Thanks again! EricEnfermero HOWDY! 06:24, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

GOCE March drive wrapup
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Notification of a June AfC BackLog Drive
 Hello Jsfouche:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a  month long Backlog Elimination Drive!

The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

The AfC helper script can assist you in tallying your edits automatically. To view a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Sent on behalf of (t) (c) by &#123;&#123;U&#124;&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) using the MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:45, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Helvie energy theory of nursing and health


The article Helvie energy theory of nursing and health has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable "theory" with no significant coverage in RS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexbrn talk 11:43, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

December 2014 GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

GOCE holiday 2014 newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

GOCE 2014 report
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

February 2015 GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 7 February 2015 (UTC)