User talk:Jsharpminor/Archive 3

Atomicity (chemistry)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Atomicity (chemistry), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Atomicity. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Well done. I am attempting to work on a dab page that needs to be split. So, yes, the content is the same for now; in five minutes it won't be. Thanks!! Jsharpminor (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kentucky Mountain Bible College/Editnotice


Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY  18:13, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Whoops. I propose: Delete. This page should not have been created.

File copyright problem with File:Vancleve Church School.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Vancleve Church School.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 04:04, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:KMBC Seal.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:KMBC Seal.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:06, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:KMBC Brengle.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:KMBC Brengle.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:KMBC Sign.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:KMBC Sign.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:06, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

SWPs
Hi. I'm not so sure about moving the SWP articles to Socialist Workers' Party. "Workers' Party" is pretty much an on-wiki jargon, it is grammatically sort of correct but in reality these parties don't use the apostrophe (see a google search of "Socialist Workers Party"). However, I'm not sure whether to raise this on WP:RM or Naming conventions. --Soman (talk) 20:58, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

What are you doing? You moved moved Socialist Workers' Party (Algeria) to Socialist Workers Party (Algeria) but moved Socialist Workers Party (Britain) to Socialist Workers Party (Britain). The apostrophe is correct, so I suggest you either leave them alone or win consensus on the talk page before moving,--Duncan (talk) 21:06, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

See the above comment. It seemed correct to me, so I started moving pages one way. Then, I was told that that was incorrect, so I started moving pages the other way. There are hundreds of articles written each way, and it would be nice to see consistency. I may go to Project:Socialism and win one consensus, but do not ask me to win consensus on each and every name before making the change. Changing them is a project enough; winning consensus for each of the thousand changes would be impossible.

Decide which way it ought to be, and I'll move it. Jsharpminor (talk) 21:11, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Where should we raise this discussion? We could open a thread at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions. --Soman (talk) 21:13, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Per naming conventions that already exist, apostrophes are to be used sparingly if at all in article titles. That seems right to me. Jsharpminor (talk) 21:16, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Translating from Spanish

 * Where do you look to find articles that need to be translated from Spanish?


 * Thanks, Sven_Manguard!! Jsharpminor (talk) 23:19, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Vancleve Church School.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Vancleve Church School.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 06:14, 30 November 2010 (UTC)