User talk:Jshgrace

Your contributed article, UFC 1499


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, UFC 1499. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - UFC 149. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at UFC 149 - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Mt king  (edits)  05:00, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to UFC 150, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Mt king  (edits)  20:44, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to UFC 147 with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Keilana | Parlez ici 20:56, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

ok

This is your last warning. The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at UFC 148, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mt king  (edits)  07:26, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Strikeforce 41


The article Strikeforce 41 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced article aon an event without a firm date, fails WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT etal.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mt king  (edits)  07:31, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Another account
Do you have another account on Wikipedia ? Mt king  (edits)  07:44, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Strikeforce 41 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Strikeforce 41 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Strikeforce 41 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mt king  (edits)  20:58, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Strikeforce: Rousey vs. Kaufman


A tag has been placed on Strikeforce: Rousey vs. Kaufman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JetBlast (talk) 19:16, 10 August 2012 (UTC)


 * The article said this event "took place" on 18 August. That's a week away: Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Also, WP:Notability to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Maybe, after the event has taken place, there will be enough independent comment about it to make an article possible. JohnCD (talk) 22:45, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

UFC 155
Hello. Please, stop changing the wikilink redirecting to List of UFC events. If you continue doing this without any explanation, your actions will be considered as vandalism. Thanks. --LlamaAl (talk) 03:51, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * It wasn't an error. I think we can create the article after the event concludes. --LlamaAl (talk) 03:54, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Nobody is blocking you. I'm only asking you to stop changing the wikilink in UFC events articles. Thanks. --LlamaAl (talk) 03:56, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

OK. Thank you

Repost of UFC: Dos Santos vs. Velasquez II
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. LlamaAl (talk) 19:00, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for intentional recreation of deleted articles. I note that you have recreated two articles today, and this edit makes it clear that you were well aware of the deletion discussions when you did so. Any admin can unblock this editor when he agrees to stop recreating articles that have been deleted via deletion discussions.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. &mdash;Kww(talk) 20:23, 6 December 2012 (UTC)