User talk:Jsivira

Declined Spatial Intelligence a new approach for architecture and design
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! This article is interesting but needs to be heavily edited. It reads like a research paper and most importantly, it reads like original research. (WP:OR) I heavily recommend that you look into contacting some of the members of WikiProject Psychology to help you edit the article so it can be appropriate for inclusion in Wikipedia. You might also need to get more resources to back up some of the claims in your article. I also recommend that you collaborate with the members of WikiPsychology to see if you can find a better name for the article. The title is reminiscent of a research paper, which is discouraged here on Wikipedia and will be more of a hindrance than a help as far as getting the article approved. Hope this helps you out! I saw that you put a lot of work into this article, so I don't want you to get too discouraged.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:35, 23 November 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79


 * At your request, I had a look at your article. I am afraid that it is not encyclopaedic, in that it pushes a particular point-of-view of spatial intelligence and of architecture. As such it counts as original research. It reads like a policy document or a manifesto, not a neutral explanation of a topic of interest to the general reader. It is also not particularly well sourced, whith most of the citations referring to the same three sources. There is much academic material on the theory of multiple intelligences that is not included and similarly, much architectural theory that may not agree with the conclusions you have drawn. As such, I can't recommend its inclusion on Wikipedia. That's not to say that it isn't useful, innovative or original thinking - just that it doesn't belong in an encyclopedia. Famousdog (talk) 10:54, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ~ Matthewrbowker   Say hi!  06:07, 24 November 2011 (UTC)