User talk:Jslpublicist

Proposed deletion of Internal quest
Hello, Jslpublicist. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Internal quest, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Internal quest to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, -   &#x0288;  u coxn \ talk 06:44, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

It also looks like you're editing from a non-neutral point of view. Does your username, Jslpublicist, stand for "Jersey Sound Lab publicist"? If so, editing the page about Internal quest might be a violation of wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. -   &#x0288;  u coxn \ talk 08:13, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Internal quest


A tag has been placed on Internal quest, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -   &#x0288;  u coxn \ talk 09:58, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because this account has been used only for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to Wikipedia policy. Also, your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation, which is also against policy. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a free advertising service.


 * What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than the one you have been promoting, you will probably not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead. If you do intend to make useful contributions about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Please note that, in order for your request to have a reasonable chance of success, you must address the conflict of interest issue, and make it clear that your editing will not be promotional, and will not be made on behalf of your business or other organisation. If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:04, 4 February 2013 (UTC)