User talk:Jsmcdo

November 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Hardin, Montana. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hardin,_Montana&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 21:50, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hardin, Montana with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 22:07, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Hardin, Montana with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) (Report a Vandal) 22:12, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Rather than starting an edit war with everyone, please take the issue to the page's talk page. Thank you. -- Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) (Report a Vandal) 22:13, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Hardin, Montana shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. -- Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) (Report a Vandal) 22:27, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kuru  (talk)  00:38, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

September 2012
Your recent editing history at Hardin, Montana shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Escape Orbit (Talk) 23:52, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Edit Warring
I do not know whether what you are trying to do on the Hardin, Montana and Two Rivers Regional Correctional Facility articles is correct or not. I do know, however, that you have already been blocked for doing it, and yet you have not yet done what has been asked of you and discussed your edits on the Talk pages. If you continue to edit war instead of trying to demonstrate the accuracy of what you are saying and reach consensus then all that is going to happen is another swift blocking, probably for longer. Please take this as a friendly advice to change your behaviour. You will not get what you want the way you are going about it. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 00:00, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

April 2014
Would you provide the requested citation for your Two Rivers edit? Thanks! Activist (talk) 23:01, 8 April 2014 (UTC)