User talk:Jsresearch

Discuss it
Per WP:BRD, it's your turn to make your case at Talk:Wave–particle duality. If you disagree with my edit summary (see the history), explain your disagreement there. Or here, or at my talk page, if you prefer. Dicklyon (talk) 01:25, 6 May 2013 (UTC)


 * The numerous published references given attest for the varied empirical works of recent times that support the simultaneous particle and wave nature of light energy. Yalley's theoritical paper reasonably fills the would-be explanatory gap that these independent results of said recent empirical works create. Please read referenced publications to understand better what I have added to the page on Wave-particle duality - specifically under Both-particle-and-wave view.--Jsresearch (talk) 02:29, 6 May 2013 (UTC)


 * The Yalley references are obscure (hard to find them or any mention of them online, e.g. in Google scholar) and the claims about all the other sources supporting the Yalley theory are probably your interpretation, not the intepretation of reliable secondary sources. Please review WP:V and WP:RS about sourcing.


 * Also, see WP:COI; if you have a dog in this fight it would be best to declare it.


 * Instead of putting it on your user page, you probably meant to go to Talk:Wave–particle duality and start a new section there. Dicklyon (talk) 02:44, 6 May 2013 (UTC)