User talk:Jsrogers24

I'm Jsrogers24. If you have any questions or concerns with my edits, please list them below.Jsrogers24 (talk) 21:25, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Burtner Stone House
A tag has been placed on Burtner Stone House requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -  Dwayne   was here! &#9835; 23:03, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Burtner Stone House
A tag has been placed on Burtner Stone House requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  JoeGazz  ▲ 23:08, 9 October 2010 (UTC) USE THE TAG, DO NOT REMOVE THE SPEEDY DELETION!'


 * Don't worry, I fixed the article. It won't be deleted. Regent of the Seatopians (talk) 00:37, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Thank you so much!

October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did here. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Escape Orbit (Talk) 21:21, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Im sorry. The person was wrong though to go against the facts. Jorja Fox is indeed a main character again, whether that person likes it or not.

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in this edit to CSI: Crime Scene Investigation (season 11). Inappropriate links include links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that serve as advertising or promotion. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 22:11, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Well that person insulted me so i gave it right back. Im not letting anybody push me around

Your edits
A little advice, don't battle or war with other editors - there is a three-revert rule - you will get yourself blocked from editing forever. Thanks -- George 2001hi  (Discussion)  22:18, 16 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Dont tell me what to do
 * It's advice - I'm not telling you what to do. But you will get yourself banned, just let it go or discuss the matter on it's talk page. -- George 2001hi  (Discussion)  22:21, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on CSI: Crime Scene Investigation. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Escape Orbit (Talk) 22:44, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits, as you are doing in CSI: Crime Scene Investigation (season 11). It appears you may be engaged in an edit war. The three-revert rule (3RR) prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. Thank you. Anemone Projectors  22:55, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Anemone Projectors  23:05, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Anthony Mason (journalist)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Anthony Mason (journalist), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.cbspressexpress.com/cbs-news/shows/cbs-evening-news-saturday-edition/bios/print?id=anthony-mason.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:03, 27 December 2011 (UTC) Leave me alone. Stop vandalizing my page
 * I've removed the bulk of the content you added to this article before coming here and seeing this notice. I have to admit being slightly concerned that you had not already addressed this issue.  Of course you may rewrite the article so that is does not come into conflict with WP:COPYVIO, but please do not put the copyrighted content back into the article.  Tide  rolls  19:56, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You did not access that source in February of '07. The article was created only 5 days ago.  Why revert me?  Tide  rolls  22:27, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Vandalism has a specific definition on this project that I have not met posting here. You may request that I not post here but I have a responsibility, as do all editors, to ensure that articles can be trusted by our readers and that the policies and guidelines are followed. If you tell me not to post here I will simply have to bring other editors into the discussion.  Alternately, you and I can discuss matters.  Disussion will take place, though, as Wikipedia is a collaborative endeavor.  I have seen your dismissive and accusitory messages on talk pages and in edit summaries and I need to let you know this type of approach does not fit in well with how this place works.  Editors are expected to respond to good faith inquiries regarding their edits. I assumed good faith in your edit to this article so I did not revert it but came here to discuss the situation. Now, can you explain why you reverted my edit to this article?  Tide  rolls  03:34, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Notice of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.  Tide  rolls  01:59, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

I would like to see this discussion. I could not find it on the page JSRogers24 20:30, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Anthony Mason (journalist), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 02:53, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked once for edit warring. Don't make an admin have to block you indefinitely. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 02:53, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from CBS Morning News with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=CBS_Morning_News&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tgeairn (talk) 22:53, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

CBS Morning News
Please acquaint yourself with this essay. When reverted, one's next step is the article talk page. Discussion does not take place in edit summaries.  Tide  rolls  05:46, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

you really seem to be against me. JSRogers24 17:30, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I apologize for giving you that impression. I only want you, as well as anyone else in the same circumstances, to be aware of the policies and guidelines that editors for this project are expected to follow.  For example, in my lastest post it was my intention to point you to certain editing conventions that are accepted on Wikipedia when one's edits are reverted.  I was not attempting to say that you had done anything wrong or that your help was not needed here.  We do need your help; but, I'm sureyou can understand with the numbers of editors we have here that certain rules must be followed so that some kind of order can be maintained.  If you have any questions or need clarification on any of these points, please ask.  I will do my best to answer.  Regards  Tide  rolls  19:46, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

I appreciate your time and help. I will indeed consider you points for future edits. Sorry for the misinterpretation. JSRogers24 18:22, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28
Hi. When you recently edited The Jeff Probst Show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syndicated (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:23, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited CBS This Morning, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthony Mason (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

July 2015
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Cathedral High School (Los Angeles). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. John from Idegon (talk) 21:55, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.