User talk:Jstrellner

June 2022
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  MrOllie (talk) 12:43, 8 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello MrOllie,
 * I did not intend for it to be considered spam.
 * There are other links on that same article linking to https://taggbox.com/ and a blog post "A list of some example social media aggregators for brands can be found here", and whole sections that just list brands in the space, for example, "This social media feed can then be displayed on a website. While other types of media aggregators pull from many different sources and brands, a personal social feed aggregator like Juicer pulls content from social media accounts you own. You can find free social media aggregators as well as paid options that offer more features. There are many free tools for that such as - Taggbox, Tagembed, Wall.io, Tint etc" (bolding mine).
 * Why is it okay for these brands, but not Everwall? I didn't try to make a link that makes no sense, like Taggbox linking "social media aggregator" in that article—I linked to our site only because I felt it was helpful.
 * We've been in business since 2008 and literally created the social wall / aggregator industry. We were named Tweetwall for many years. I felt it was appropriate to list us, but I digress. Jstrellner (talk) 14:08, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is a large site and volunteer time is limited. Just because you might have found some advertising that hasn't been removed yet is not a reason to add more. Also, since you are a representative of this company, you are currently in violation of Wikipedia's terms of use. See WP:PAID. MrOllie (talk) 14:15, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Like I said, my intentions were honest—and you can clearly see it by my responses here—and I felt it was improving it by linking to an example. I do now see how it's a conflict of interest, and sadly that same conflict of interest prevents me from fixing the article to meet Wikipedia's standards. Hopefully in time the article can be updated. Jstrellner (talk) 14:30, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
 * If you'd like to help us, please list some of the articles you noticed that have external links embedded in the article body. We'll be happy to remove them. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:48, 8 June 2022 (UTC)