User talk:Jstwrt

April 2018
Your WP:User name appears to be a problem, as it suggests a corporate relationship. I think you should consider getting a new user name. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 15:36, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Consulting Wholesale
Hello Consultingwholesale,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Consulting Wholesale for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 16:06, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Courcelles (talk) 16:11, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Are you associated with this website in some way? 331dot (talk) 20:46, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

I am - I am happy to use a on the page I wish to publish. I understand that whereas it is discouraged, I still want to create a factual nonbiased page. This is not for promotional purposes but as a company history and details of what the company do.


 * Please note that merely telling the world about your website, even if "factual" and "nonbiased" is still considered promotional on Wikipedia. Wikipedia has no interest in what an article subject wishes to say about itself, or how it wants to be portrayed. Wikipedia is only interested in what independent reliable sources that have in depth coverage of the subject have to say about it, which indicates how the subject meets notability guidelines, in this case those for websites.  Please review these links.  Not every website merits an article here. It is difficult for an uninvolved editor to create a new article, it is even more difficult for those with a COI.  You would essentially need to forget everything you know about the website and only write based on what is stated in independent sources.  That does not include press releases, the website itself, or any other primary source.  Most people in your position find this difficult to do.
 * You will not be unblocked if all you want to do on Wikipedia is tell about this website. To be unblocked, you will need to do the following:
 * agree to not directly edit about your website
 * make the appropriate conflict of interest and if applicable paid editor declarations(the latter is required by Wikipedia's Terms of Use if you are paid)
 * tell us what other areas of Wikipedia you want to edit in.
 * If you do those things and after you are unblocked establish a good contribution history you may be later permitted to submit a draft article about your website for an independent review, assuming you have proper sources, but that will not be allowed immediately. If you wish to agree to those things, please tell us. 331dot (talk) 17:49, 25 April 2018 (UTC)