User talk:Jt512

Q-Chem
Your recent large set of edits to this article are most interesting, but almost entirely unreferenced. The "History" section has no references that support the information given. That also applies to much else. It also reads as if it is a straight copy from some Q-Chem documentation, so some people might suggest that it is a copyright violation. I suggest that you need to address these matters. -- Bduke   (Discussion)  02:40, 9 February 2012 (UTC)


 * The article isn't finished and will be updated with complete references ASAP. None of the material, to the best of my knowledge, violates copyright law. –Jt512 (talk)
 * What do you mean by "to the best of my knowledge"? If you wrote it yourself in your own words, then you would be certain. If you copied it, there is possibly a copyright violation. Is it taken from the Q-Chem documentation or web pages? You should also add references as you go along, because that is where you got the information that you are writing about in your own words. -- Bduke   (Discussion)  03:19, 10 February 2012 (UTC)


 * The material was written by Anna Krylov, a member of the Q-Chem Board of Directors, who gave it to me to copy edit and to update the Wikipedia entry. I said "to the best of my knowledge" because the material was not written by me.  However, Anna has subsequently confirmed to me that the material was written in her own words, as required by copyright law. —Jt512 (talk)
 * OK. I was trying to give you a friendly warning before others see your edits as they did look like a copy. I have heard Anna at a conference and I know Peter Gill and Fritz Schaefer on the Q-Chem Board. -- Bduke   (Discussion)  05:27, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Announce first Q-Chem-version.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Announce first Q-Chem-version.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:05, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Citations-to-qchem-papers.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Citations-to-qchem-papers.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:12, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:535107106 jizyy-O.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:535107106 jizyy-O.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:16, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

List of quantum chemistry and solid-state physics software
Why do you act so desperate to remove the qualifier "notable" out of the intro. The list is full of non-notable entries (i.e. programs without their own article). It is a better idea to write those articles than fighting over a qualifier and in fact allow spamming. The Banner talk 07:59, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

July 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to List of quantum chemistry and solid-state physics software, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Banner talk 23:17, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, I think I call what you are doing not only disruptive, but also editwarring and POV-pushen. With a smell of advertising. The Banner  talk 23:26, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
 * And please read WP:CSC where the first bullet is exactly my point. And contrary to what you seem to believe, that is not from my hand. The Banner  talk 09:46, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)