User talk:Jthornhill16/New sandbox

General info Whose work are you reviewing? Jthornhill16 Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Jthornhill16/New sandbox

Peer Review by kab055mun

The lead has been updated very well. All of the content is present in the article and is concise and not overly detailed. The first sentence Cleary explains what the article is about. The lead also does mention the two main sections of the article. There is no information in the lead that is not in the article. Overall the lead is very well-developed and easy to read. This lead is much better and more detailed than the lead that was already present in the article. All of the content is very relevant to the topic and it is up to date as far as I can tell. Once thing that might want to be added is an example of a species that has adaptive to an urban setting. Maybe a section discussing what an animals habitat was like and what it is like now thanks to Synurbization. Also maybe expend on the consequences, although it is not part of the behaviour it is a aspect of the topic. Other then that the information in the article is well research and suits to topic very well. This article has lots of sources, they seem to be thorough and reflect the available literature on the topic. The sources all seem to be current as far as I can tell. The links work just fine.The content is very well written. It is easy to read, concise and organized well. However, maybe add subheadings under the changes in behaviour section. I think that would make the article even easier to read and help a reader find what they are looking for faster. There were no grammatical or spelling errors as far as I could tell. Overall the article is well organized and easy to read. The images added defiantly enhance the article. The old version was very boring to look at it is more interesting with the addition of images. The images added are also well captioned and adhere to the copyright regulations. They are also added to appropriate sections.Overall the content added has greatly improved the article. It was not much of an article before and it has become much more developed. A strength of the content added is that all of the information is backed up be reliable sources and there is a lot of information that was added. It is now a way better article and was interesting to read.