User talk:Jtmorgan/Archive 6

Hey
I added myself to the inviters list for hostbot — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zppix (talk • contribs) 03:44, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

---Censorship of factual information-

I was unfairly blocked from editing - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_San_Bernardino_shooting I added a reference from (https://www.fbi.gov/news/news_blog/fbi-will-investigate-san-bernardino-shootings-as-terrorist-act) to Islamic terrorism and was unjustly blocked from posting the truth? I will make sure this goes viral since I'm being censored from posting facts with a .gov reference supporting it!

You've been blocked, welcome, and join us at the teahouse!
I'm not clear on exactly what the intersection is between HostBot and the user whose name also shows up in those teahouse welcome templates, so maybe I need to talk to instead, but surely we should not be welcoming people and inviting them to the teahouse literally one minute after they've been blocked as a sock? (See User talk:Pppakistan) Can the bot check for that sort of thing and abort the task if it finds a block? Beeblebrox (talk) 21:13, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The short timespan between the block and the invite is actually the problem: my script checks the blocked status of all the day's potential invitees in a batch (for performance reasons), between sending the invites, so there's a gap of between 1 and ~10 minutes between the block check and the time at which any individual invite is sent. There are other potential lags that can cause this issue as well: for example, the database that holds the block table occasionally lags, so the block status of a particular user may not be up-to-date when its checked. Anyway, thanks for reporting the issue, and please report again if you see this (or anything else weird) crop up. I've only had half a dozen block reports in 4 years (see also 1, 2, 3, 4), so my sense is that this problem is rare. Jtmorgan (talk) 00:35, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * FYI I've seen this case where a invite is received a few minutes after a block is issued on only a few occasions. It would be ideal to be able to check each user individually before an invite is sent, but even then, some issues with lag would probably still be at play as Jonathan describes.  Jonathan would know this best, but I also suspect an individual approach (as opposed to a small batch system) may not be very effective (i.e. editors who meet the criteria would be passed over). I, JethroBT drop me a line 05:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you both for your replies. If it's only happened a few times in as many years it probably doesn't need "fixing". Beeblebrox (talk) 18:48, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Your bot left a welcome note in my sock
For the record, User:Guy vandegriftSock3 is one of three sock accounts that I maintain. I am pretty sure the creation of these accounts is well justified at User:Guy vandegriftSock3, where I explain that I am developing a course management system on Wikiversity. If you know of any procedure by which I request permission to do this, let me know.--Guy vandegrift (talk) 14:22, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

thanks for your mlg crap
Hi Cossoas I Like your Username lt makes seem exitcing to work pubilc Nice work! (Cossoas (talk) 00:20, 5 January 2016 (UTC))

reference to your message on my (Kavach shah ) user talk
Thanks for inviting me  From. ......Kavach shah Kavach shah (talk) 02:21, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

reference to your message
Thanks for inviting me to the Teahouse --Trillym (talk) 12:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Cascadia Wikimedians page at English Wikipedia
Feel free to add Cascadia Wikimedians User Group to your watchlist to stay updated about CWUG-related activities and events. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:03, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Notification about disabling the Wikipedia collections tool
Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following [ http://goo.gl/forms/ZyYQm6uu7e form]. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.

Thanks,

Jon Katz

Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation

Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 23:55, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Security issue - mail
The mail contains info about security issue connected with HostBot. --Urbanecm (talk) 16:11, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, ! J-Mo 21:26, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for...
Hello HostBot/Jtmorgan.Thanks for inviting me to the teahouse EnchantingZucchini (talk) 00:18, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Blocked user
Hi, Hostbot. I understand it's difficult for you to notice if a new user has a bad username. But don't you notice if they've already been blocked? I blocked User:Dank Shit four minutes before you invited him/her to the Teahouse. [Hastily:] I'm just wondering. I don't mean to make you feel bad, you're a very nice bot! Bishonen &#124; talk 17:41, 29 March 2016 (UTC).
 * Hey . This sort of thing has come up before (see here with an explanation), though it seems fairly uncommon.  One important issue is that there is a 1-10 minute gap between evaluating the blocked status of editors who can be potentially invited and when the invitation is actually sent. Another issue has to do with delays in updates to the database of blocked editors that HostBot checks. I, JethroBT drop me a line 22:18, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I thought it was probably something like that. Have a slice of banoffee pie, dear HostBot. Bishonen &#124; talk 22:29, 29 March 2016 (UTC).
 * Thank you both! please do continue to ping me when you see strange stuff like this. J-Mo 23:20, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Maybe
You might have a more informed opinion about m:Requests for comment/Enable by default some default options for new users than average. (not watching this page) WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:10, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Canada and United States affiliates meetup
Thanks a lot. I am new to wikipedia so please forgive if I do mistakes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poonampan (talk • contribs) 20:54, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

About HostBot
Hello, I'm not sure if this is the right place to put this, but recently today in recent changes, over half of the changes I see are HostBot's. However, I have it set to not show me the edit of bots. Any idea why this might happen? Thanks, JumpiMaus (talk) 16:08, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi . Sorry for the delayed response—I've been distracted IRL. I'll look into this: HostBot used to have a bot flag, but a few months ago I changed the authentication method (to OAuth) the bot uses to log in and make edits. It's possible that this change removed the bot flag. I'll examine the code this week and report back what I find. Thanks for the heads-up, J-Mo 20:04, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
 * No problem. JumpiMaus (talk) 20:18, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Example of good hosting
Hi, Jonathan. This is an example of what I was saying to you, about 's excellent manner at the Teahouse: informative, supportive, and welcoming. --ColinFine (talk) 09:08, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I agree, . Welcoming, clear, detailed, actionable, enthusiastic—empathetic even. Thanks (who is probably wondering why he's getting pinged on my talkpage all a-sudden). J-Mo 22:05, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks to both of you for the kind words. I have been very busy in recent weeks, but if you are still interested in interviewing me, Jtmorgan, I will try to find the time. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  01:11, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

About the importance of Koolcard
About the importance of Koolcard

If you go to Singapore, you may use a card named Koolcard, it has already shown its existence (more than 1,000 merchants have already used it) in local market under the cooperation of China Smartpay and NETS (you can wiki it in Wikipedia). Since it is the “baby” of NETS, why not be available to let the users be clear about it. That is why it should be known in Wiki. If you any questions, pls freely tell me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Homeschaplin (talk • contribs) 10:19, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

About the importance of Koolcard 2
Besides in mainland China, we have 30,000 around fans in Weibo, 10,000+ fans in WeChat official Account.

Moreover we have BAT (Baidu, Alibaba & Tencent) as the partners to supply the support, and the potential users will be 0.3 billion+, for such a huge number how can we say no important about Koolcard. As a global influential platform, the data keep fresh is also important too. Hope you can understand the situation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Homeschaplin (talk • contribs) 10:31, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your Magnificent Invitation, HostBot!
I'm great-full and humbled to be invited at this great Teahouse! thank you for thinking about me HotBot PAL Jack30mulenga (talk) 09:15, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Help Move A Page Draft:Aramide to Aramide
Good Day, Jtmorgan can you help me in moving this draft to Aramide.. --Obari2Kay (talk) 16:13, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Enoch-Jude Danquah


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Wikipedia:Enoch-Jude Danquah, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Largoplazo (talk) 20:16, 11 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the heads-up, . Looks like the page was the user talkpage of . HostBot created the page with a Teahouse welcome, but the user subsequently used their talkpage to draft an article and moved it into Wikipedia namespace. It happens! Pinging the relevant editor so that know the page was deleted. J-Mo 21:27, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Thanks J-Mo.

Frr2391 (talk) 11:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC) 

Thanks!
Im always loving learning about wiki and meeting new people! Filmfan655321 (talk) 10:09, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Green Mountain Anarchist Collective
How can I prove the imagages I am using are NOT copy righted. I have teh paper copies in front of me and they plainly state they reject their copy rights and they are free to use ("for any purpose but coperate profit"). Hense they are ideal for The Commons. But again, these exist on printed paper copies and NOT onlibe. -Keith Richards 1871 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keith Richards 1871 (talk • contribs) 04:49, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
 * As I've already told this user, Wikipedia use of images requires that they be available for all uses, including for profit, and it also appears that the Collective rejects other people's copyrights and reuses their material I don't think we can use these images. Meters (talk) 17:32, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

/* Thanks */
Hello! I am here because I received a message from HostBot. I wish to know why. thank you.--Join30 (talk) 12:23, 19 August 2016 (UTC)


 * because you joined Wikipedia recently, and made some edits :) Welcome! J-Mo 22:25, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

thanks for having time to reply --Join30 (talk) 02:52, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

A request
Hi, Host Bot currently leaves messages inviting users to Teahouse. His message contains a button - "Visit Teahouse". This button currently resembles Template:Clickable button 4. Therefore I request you to remove the code from his message and use the template instead. Thanks &mdash;  Varun FEB2003     I am Online    14:18, 29 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Hello . HostBot substitutes this template, which is fully protected. I can't edit it myself, but if you leave your request at Wikipedia_talk:Teahouse, there's probably an admin around who can at least consider it. Why do you prefer we call another template rather than invoking the UI button classes directly? J-Mo 22:36, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello Sir! Thank You for your response I've left a fully-protected edit request instead out there to transclude the button template inside the invite. Unnecessary code on User's talk page only increases it's size and make it difficult to use the text editor whereas transclusion cuts down the code to a much simpler and shorter form.  Varun  FEB2003   I am Online 11:31, 20 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Makes good sense to me! Thanks, J-Mo 18:36, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * But it is being rejected! Can you help me out. Thanks!  Varun FEB2003   I am Offline 11:20, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Architecture enthusiast


A tag has been placed on User talk:Architecture enthusiast requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cahk (talk) 08:02, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Hostbot: Addition of teahouse invitations to a non-user talk page
I have never seen this before, Hostbot added a teahouse template to this non-user talk page. 86.22.8.235 (talk) 06:27, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

NPP & AfC
A dedicated venue for combined discussion about NPP & AfC where a work group is also proposed has been created. See: The future of NPP and AfC --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:50, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you, . I appreciated your message. However, if you want to thank the people who are really behind TWA, you should thank and  ;) Happy Editing! J-Mo 20:47, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Ushen Kowlessar Bhinbahdur


A tag has been placed on User talk:Ushen Kowlessar Bhinbahdur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 01:02, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Hey there am also new to this whole thing though it seems interesting getting notifications from you guys lol. I appreciate thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by DM SUS (talk • contribs) 06:04, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello
Do I get any invitations to the teahouse? - ReZawler 13:37, 28 October 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ReZawler (talk • contribs)

Interview invitation from a Wikipedia researcher in University of Minnesota
Hello Jtmorgan,

I am Bowen Yu, a Ph.D. student from GroupLens Research at the University of Minnesota - Twin Cities. Currently, we are undertaking a study about turnover (editors leaving and joining) in WikiProjects within Wikipedia. We are trying to understand the effects of member turnovers in the WikiProject group, in terms of the group performance and member interaction, with a purpose of learning how to build successful online communities in future. More details about our project can be found on this meta-wiki page.

I notice you are active in activities related to project page and project talk page, so I wonder if I could invite you for an interview if you are interested in our study and willing to share your experience with us. The interview will be about 30 - 45 minutes via phone, Skype or Google Hangout. You will receive a $10 gift card as compensation afterwards.

Please reach me at bowen@cs.umn.edu if you are interested or have any questions.

Thank you, Bowen


 * Hi, thanks for thinking of me. As a professional researcher with the Wikimedia Foundation, who wrote his dissertation on WikiProjects, I am probably not an ideal candidate for your research. Sounds interesting though! I look forward to reading the paper :) Thanks, J-Mo 23:02, 10 November 2016 (UTC)


 * ''P.S. remember to sign your posts on talkpage by typing four tildes ( ~ ) at the end of your message.


 * Wow, I see. Thank you all the same! Bobo.03 (talk) 23:09, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review needs your help
Hi ,

As an AfC reviewer you're probably aware that a new user right has been created for patrolling new pages (you might even have been granted the right already, and admins have it automatically).

Since July there has been a very serious backlog at Special:NewPagesFeed of over 14,000 pages, by far the worst since 2011, and we need an all out drive to get this back down to just a few hundred that can be easily maintained in the future. Unlike AfC, these pages are already in mainspace, and the thought of what might be there is quite scary. There are also many good faith article creators who need a simple, gentle push to the Tea House or their pages converted to Draft rather than being deleted. Although New Page Reviewing can occasionally be somewhat more challenging than AfC, the criteria for obtaining the right are roughly the same. The Page Curation tool is even easier to use than the Helper Script, so it's likely that most AfC reviewers already have more than enough knowledge for the task of New Page Review.

It is hoped that AfC reviewers will apply for this right at WP:PERM and lend a hand. You'll need to have read the page at WP:NPR and the new tutorial.

(Sent to all active AfC reviewers) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Pings
Hi Jonathan. Just a note to say that this won't have triggered a notification, as pings only work when you sign the post. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:39, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you, J-Mo 23:11, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Research:Wikimedia Summer of Research 2011
Hi Jonathan. You were part of the team that provided the above research. Most of the results of that action were extremely valuable and were partly what triggered my volunteer collaboration with the WMF to seek for and develop solutions for correctly patrolling new pages. There has been only minimal progress since our Skype discussion 5 months ago and I am wondering if it would be possible to get the 2011 researach updated. All that would be needed are just some of the graphs and charts updating using the same formulae again. I'm contacting you because you are one of the few employees left from that era and I would assume you would know who to ask, or at least let me know who I can ask. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:19, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, happy to help if I can. What new data would you like to see? Some of the datasets are easier to replicate that others. And some of them are within my capabilities to generate, while others are not. Additionally, while it's true that and I (and of course ) are the only current staff who were directly involved in the summer of research, other former research interns are still wiki-active on a volunteer basis (see ,  , and ), and may be able to help with datasets and/or graphs that they had a hand in developing. And of course folks like , , , and  may also be able and willing to help out, depending on what you need. Anyway, just letting you know you have options. What were you thinking? J-Mo 21:21, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * THanks Jonathan. It's just 8:00 am here, I'll give you a short list later of the graphs I'm interested in. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:03, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
 * These are the items of the research that I would like to get some updates on. I have an upcoming meeting very soon with the devs and this information would be extremely helpful to enable us to focus on certain priorities of the project which you helped provide important feedback on from the discussion you and I had, and thank you very much for that. #1 through #4 are the most important.

It's possible that a similar sample period from 2016 would sufficient to see if the trends have changes significantly or not.
 * m:Research:The_Speed_of_Speedy_Deletions
 * m:Research:Wikimedia_Summer_of_Research_2011/Deletion_notifications_to_new_users
 * m:Research:Patroller_work_load
 * m:Research:Newbie_reverts_and_subsequent_editing_behavior
 * m:Research:New_User_Participation_in_Help_Spaces
 * m:Research:Wikiproject_Participation_%26_Mentorship

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:13, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Hey Kudpung, I saw that you posted a duplicate question on my talkpage, but I figured it would be easier if I just responded here. So, yeah, updating some of these graphs won't be trivial.  For example, I just looked at m:Research:The Speed of Speedy Deletions and I don't see a query or something else I can work from.  I think it would take roughly 5-6 hours of work to replicate each analysis.  Essentially, you're asking for a week's worth of work by one or two researchers.  Still, I think we can do some of it.  If you can be very specific about what you're trying to learn, that'll help us focus our efforts where they'd be most effective.  --EpochFail  (talk &bull; contribs) 15:25, 28 November 2016 (UTC)


 * What I'm working on, is specifically the effects of poor tagging done through New Page Patrol on articles created by new users. I think some recents stats and summaries can underline once more the findings of Summer of Research 2011, which was a very important programe, but which I think the volunteer communities took less notice of than the the people at the WMF who decide on strategies and priorities. We need some recent data to help the community understand that reforms to the way in which new pages are patrolled are needed, and to help your colleagues at the WMF decide that a proper landing page is needed on registration, for new users whose first intention is to write an article.


 * For#1, it's important to demonstrate the annoyance that is felt by good fatih editors when their articles are tagged for deletion either: Because the patroller is not sufficiently knowledgeable about policies, or the creator was not adequately aware of what constitutes an acceptable Wikipedia article. As a consequence, we think we're still losing potential new users, but we need data to support that theory.
 * For#2 we need to know if  still holds true.
 * For#3, I can probably do without it. Patrollers never reported locally to me that they felt they were overloaded. Volunteers just stop anything when they feel they've done enough. We already know that we don't have enough active patrollers today.
 * For#4, I can probably do without. It's more specifically related to reverted edits.


 * If you and Jonathan can come up with data that's easier and quicker to realise than running the same operations done in 2011, I am of course open to any suggestions. Likewise, don't hesistate to ask if I haven't explained clearly what is needed. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:02, 28 November 2016 (UTC)


 * I'll stake my reputation on the continued validity of the findings in #1 and #2. Generally, I would only take the time to replicate a study like that if I had a reason to believe that there had been some systemic change in the interim. For example, if the notification templates had all been swapped out for new ones that had a substantially different tone (more aggressive, or more conciliatory), or if deletion criteria had been dramatically revised. The actions of individual patrollers—some of whom may be more strict or lax in their enforcement than others, or who may take a more or less personalized, hands-on approach—these mostly average out. However, I agree that a registration landing page would be useful. This might be something that the Collaboration team would be interested in working on, after they deploy the the current suite of edit review improvements tools. My intent is not to shut down your line of inquiry, by the way. Is there other, additional evidence that you would consider to be relevant to improving edit/article review—for both reviewers and reviewed? J-Mo 03:09, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * It's certainly reassuring to know you would stake your reputation on it, I would stake mine too on the same findings. However, our community is a very picky bunch of people when it comes to debates, and they are likely to claim 'bad faith' if you forget to dot an i in the RfC statement. If they are not given hard facts, they would laugh me out of town if I used 6 year old data. Still, your comments are fine for me to comment at the WMF meeting. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:57, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * In an interesting parallel, I'm experiencing some of that very pickiness (rigor?) firsthand right now in a spirited debate on the Teahouse talkpage. If I lose that one, I'll likely have more bandwidth to turn my attention to researching new user support options elsewhere. Which might be good news for your project, I suppose. Sigh. Anyway, keep me in the loop here? I'll try to reply promptly. I'm deeply concerned that requiring autoconfirmed status for article creation will have lasting, negative consequences for new editor retention (and by extension, long term community health and content quality). But I'm not opposed to experimentation. I'm also conscious of the mounting backlogs and danger of reviewer burnout, and the inadequacy of current tools. J-Mo 03:11, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * ACTRIAL wouldn't lose a single potential reasonable author of acceptable new articles. The current system of patrolling new pages is losing us more than that already. Unfortunately there are no stats to prove it and no way to create stats for it. The only thing that counts is the years of empirical hands-on experience made by the tiny handful of highly experienced editors and admins who have stuck with searching for solutions all through these past 6 years. THe fact is that about 85 - 90% of all new articles fom new (that is non-autoconfirmed) users get deeted. Don't worry about reviewer burnout - there never was any. Volunteers in any project stop before that happens, and it's the lack of community  and WMF support that has caused most of the competent patrollers to drift away. Weve now given them the support and the inadequacy of the tools is therefore the priority now.  If all else fails, the community might just go ahead and enact their huge consensus for ACTRIAL - it's only a small extension of something the WMF already did 10 years ago. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:45, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected
AfC Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Please join us for our Cascadia Wikimedians annual meeting, Saturday, December 17, 2pm
20:46, 15 December 2016 (UTC) To unsubscribe from future messages from Meetup/Seattle, please remove your name from this list.

Inviter list newcomer
Hi,I have joined the inviter's list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saikirantangirala (talk • contribs) 07:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Can you nominate me as a Administrator of Wikipedia?
Hey Jtmorgan, Thanks for sending me a message to invite me to Teahouse and I have a favor,.......... Can you nominate me as a administrator of Wikipedia, if i edit or create many articles and templates. But not for now because i'm a new user of Wikipedia. Thanks for reading this message --Nothing2004 (talk) 11:18, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
hi i'm mau kahn and i'm sending this message to you because i love your edits and please keep going

Mau kahn (talk) 23:04, 31 January 2017 (UTC) 

Remove me from Hostbot list of users please
Hey JMo,

Sorry but I have not been able to devote as much time to Wiki editing as I'd like. Can you please remove me from the Hostbot list of hosts please? I dont think I'd be able to do justice in replying to the newcomers.

Thanks and cheers, Soni (talk) 08:54, 28 January 2017 (UTC)


 * No problem, . Just made the change! J-Mo 23:03, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

HostBot and Bots
Edits like are a bit pointless. I suggest that you make HostBot skip bot accounts (which can be determined by the presence of the bot flag, templates, or categories), or new accounts otherwise flagged as legit alternate accounts. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 16:22, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:ParthibanP


A tag has been placed on User talk:ParthibanP, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. &mdash; O Fortuna!   Imperatrix mundi.  07:43, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Thomasalexander550


A tag has been placed on User talk:Thomasalexander550 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. &mdash; O Fortuna!   Imperatrix mundi.  15:00, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Seemauniyal2


A tag has been placed on User talk:Seemauniyal2, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. &mdash; O Fortuna   velut luna...  14:46, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Ganeriwals
Wikipedia:Ganeriwals, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Ganeriwals and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Ganeriwals during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  12:05, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Teahouse invitations
Good morning - I've striked myself out of the teahouse invitation list as I feel I am not active enough in the project to warrant it. Many thanks, Osarius - Want a chat? 07:06, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Sounds good, . I'll remove you from the invite rolls for now. Best, J-Mo 15:46, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you, . This means a great deal to me, especially coming from someone like you :) J-Mo 18:44, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
 * You're welcome, and thank you for your kind words! Osarius - Want a chat? 09:11, 27 April 2017 (UTC)