User talk:Jtneill

Note:I'm mostly over at Wikiversity.

Invite to Canberra Meetup #2
--.../Nemo (talk • Contributions) 15:35, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Personal Information
You don't have any personal information on your page such as your name, education and intersts. I found you listed under acedemic psychologists. I would like to know your specialty areas, what articles you are working on/have worked on etc. Thank you. 24.56.242.121 (talk) 15:40, 27 February 2009 (UTC)amyanda2000 (I know I need to sign on, but I'm feeling to lazy to try to remember my password)

Articles for deletion/Adventure
An article which you edited clear back in 2005, is now up for deletion. You are welcome to comment there. Ikip (talk) 07:13, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up - I've voted keep and add some more content to the article. -- Jtneill - Talk 11:37, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * your welcome :) Ikip (talk) 20:46, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Multi-edit vandalism
Hi -- thanks for your efforts at protecting Wikipedia. Let me just mention that when you spot a vandal edit, it's good to be alert to the possibility that it was one of a sequence. Reverting only the most recent edit may actually make it harder for other editors who watch the article to figure out what is going on, as in Cognition. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 20:52, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Green exercise


The article Green exercise has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article with little content, context or supporting references. Probable neologism

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
 * Hi, I've tagged the green exercise page for potential deletion, as it contains very little content, does not appear to be a widespread term and appears to be introducing a term rather than describing a concept. Cheers, Clovis Sangrail (talk) 09:23, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, Me again. I'm still not sure about the article as it seems to be a definition rather than a topic ittself, and it and the wikiversiity pages link back to 1 reference.  I've listed it for discussion on the AFD page to get a few more opinions Articles for deletion/Log/2010 March 30.

AfD nomination of Green exercise
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Green exercise. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Green exercise. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Teamwork
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Teamwork. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Teamwork. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Recent Changes Camp Canberra Aug 11, 2010
I saw your edits on the University of Canberra WP entry, and thought, by chance, you might like to come to this: RecentChangesCamp, Canberra is being held at the University of Canberra, Building 7, Room 7XC37 on 11 August 2010. ABOUT | REGISTRATION | SCHEDULE

Hope we'll see you and friends there. Leighblackall (talk) 00:10, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi Jt yes good to see the real live person! Do you think we should have the photos or avatar pictures as in the liquid threads? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:08, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Tharwa Primary School for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Tharwa Primary School, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tharwa Primary School until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shirt58 (talk) 14:32, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Happy Jtneill's Day!
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, click here. Have a Great Day... Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 05:05, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above is given on behalf of User:La comadreja. -  Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 05:06, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia 10 - Canberra event
This is your invitation to the 10th anniversary event for Wikipedia, on Saturday 15 January 2011; please see http://ten.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canberra for details, and RSVP if at all possible. (You are listed on WikiProject_Canberra.) Will I see you there? Cheers, - Peter Ellis - Talk 06:33, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Adventure Activities Licensing Authority


The article Adventure Activities Licensing Authority has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash; RHaworth 14:26, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Philosophical Research note question
Hi:

I found the description on Philosophical Research to be very fitting to a current project I'm undertaking. However, I've been unable to find any sources outside of the Wikipedia article (e.g. books or articles) that detail this methodology. Would you mind sharing some references about how to undertake "Philosophical Research"?

Thank you and best,

Ani — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.1.208.141 (talk) 00:28, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Wikicite
Hello there, you may be interested in the new discussion on Meta. Your input would be welcome. – SJ + 05:46, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

You're invited to the Canberra WikiMeetup on 20 November 2011
Hi! We're having a Canberra Wikimeetup on 20 November 2011 at Siren Bar in Gunghalin from 2pm to 4pm. It's most just a chance to chat with other local Wikipedians, get a chance to go a different sort of bar (which is reasonably kid friendly, serves real food, and has non-alcholic options), and, if you're interested, learning more about what Wikimedia Australia and local GLAM projects are happening. We'd love to see you and any Wikipedia/Wikimedia/wiki loving friends you have there. --LauraHale (talk) 07:14, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia Takes the Australian War Memorial
Hi. You're invited to Wikipedia Takes the Australian War Memorial on 25 August at the Australian War Memorial. --LauraHale (talk) 00:29, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Canberra meetup invitation: January 2013
Hi there! You are cordially invited to attend a meetup being held on Wednesday 9 January 2013. Yes, that is tomorrow. Sorry about the short notice.

Details an attendee list are at Meetup/Canberra/January 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:44, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in ACT)

Copyright concern
A concern has occurred here regarding an edit you have made Thanks  Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 23:34, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Canberra meetup invitation: February 2013
Hi there! You are cordially invited to attend a meetup being held on Sunday 24 February 2013. Sorry about the short notice.

Details and attendee list are at Meetup/Canberra/February 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 08:10, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in ACT)

Tomorrow's Symposium
Just a quick reminder to everyone who has indicated their interest on-wiki. The Wikimedia in Higher Education symposium at The University of Sydney is on tomorrow. We have a full day of speakers and workshops, and about 45-50 participants. See you there. --99of9 (talk) 02:42, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Jtneill, it it nice to meet with you at the Wikimedia workshop at Sydney Uni on 5th April 2013. As I am amateur in Wikipedia I need to learn many things from you. Keep in touch thanks Ashishlohorung (talk) 07:23, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Village pump (policy)
Because you have edited No consensus, your input is requested in the discussion at Village pump (policy). Cheers! bd2412 T 14:40, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Interpersonal conflict
Hi Jtneill. You redirected Interpersonal conflict, yet the destination page says nothing at all about the subject. What was the idea behind the redirect? Rui &#39;&#39;Gabriel&#39;&#39; Correia (talk) 15:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Sandboxes
Hi Jtneill. Thanks for your help with item above. I see you heve been here for 10 years, so I am sure you must know a few things. I want to work on an article without it being live and have often seen people working in sandboxes. However I don't want it directly in my sandbox, so this is what I did. Could you please take a quick look and let me know if this is okay? Thanks for your help. Rui &#39;&#39;Gabriel&#39;&#39; Correia (talk) 20:18, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, this is sorted out, thanks. Rui &#39;&#39;Gabriel&#39;&#39; Correia (talk) 21:24, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:AndrewBarr2006.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AndrewBarr2006.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:43, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Talkback
Stefan2 (talk) 19:35, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Canberra meetup invitation
Hi, you're invited to the Canberra meetup which will take place at King O'Malley's Irish Pub in Civic on 17 February 2016. Bidgee (talk) 01:41, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Post-purchase rationalization for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Post-purchase rationalization is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Post-purchase rationalization until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 18:47, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Canberra meetup invitation (August 2016)
I'll be in Canberra from the 29-30 August, there is a planned meet-up at King O'Malley's (though I'm open to suggestions) from 6pm on the 29 August. Sorry for the short noticed, only had the trip confirmed this afternoon. Bidgee (talk) 11:17, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Canberra meetup
Hi, there will be a meetup in Canberra on the 20 January 2018 at 7pm, I hope you're able to make it but understand that this is very short notice. Bidgee (talk) 22:04, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

neuromorphic computing
what are your thoughts on the role of neuromorphic computers in the study of psychology/neuroscience? — Preceding unsigned comment added by RJJ4y7 (talk • contribs) 17:08, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:38, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Requesting some article expansion help
Greetings @ Jtneill

Requesting your visit to the article Draft:Irrational beliefs and help expand the same if the topic interests you.

Thanks and warm regards

&#32;Bookku, &#39;Encyclopedias &#61; expanding information &#38; knowledge&#39; (talk) 13:44, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

May 2023
Your edit to Psychological literacy has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 00:09, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)